Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이 블로그의 체크인 이 장소의 다른 글 안녕하세요 조이젤리입니다🤗 이번에는 조개구이 + 바다 가까이에 있는 숙소 리뷰를 준비했습니다 모텔이지만 거부감 없이 머물다가기 좋은 곳이었습니다 내돈내산 솔직후기 보시죠. 서귀포 내 훌륭한 장소에 자리한 하루호텔에서는 에어컨, 무료 wifi가 완비된 객실, 무료 전용 주차장 등을 제공합니다. 하루모텔 글쓴이 추천 깨끗하고 친절한 서비스무료 주차 및 wifi 제공선재도 인근 편리한 위치 장단점 분석. 트립어드바이저 하루모텔, 인천 트립어드바이저에서 인천의 56 기타 숙박시설 중 31위에 랭크되고, 5점만점 평가에서 5점을 받은 하루모텔에 관한 건의 여행자 리뷰.

영흥화력발전소 화력발전소 숙소 영흥도모텔 영흥도숙소 영흥화력발전소모텔 서해바다드라이브코스 선재도가볼만한곳 해루질 서해갯벌체험 펜션같은 모텔 호텔같은 모텔 가족단위로도 많이 방문하는 모텔 추억만들기 1등모텔.. 근데 이번에는 퇴실 1시간 전부터 담배냄새가 올라오더라구요ㅠ 그거 제외하면 별이 5개.. 부산의 번화한 서면 지역에 위치한 하루 호텔 서면은 현대적인 편안함과 뛰어난 위치를 자랑하는 최고의 선택입니다..

트위터 ㄱㄷ

트위터 검색어 랭킹

털두창아카

여행 23개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 여행 카테고리 글. 810점으로 품질과 가성비가 뛰어난 호텔입니다, 5점을 받은 8개의 고객리뷰도 확인하세요. 저녁 9시에 도착하였을때는 예약한 301호. 하루모텔 예약은 광주 여행을 더욱 편안하게 만들어 드립니다, 하루모텔 후기, 사진 및 가격을 확인하고 트립닷컴에서 최저가로 예약하세요.

저는 방이 항상 깔끔해야 한다고 생각하는데 하루모텔을 들어서는순간 너무 깔끔한거에요 장거리로 모텔 방 잡을일이 많은데 잡는 방들이 다 깔끔 할수는 없고 적어도 머리카락 어떤 모텔이든 흠이 있거든요 근데 정말 이모텔은 제 맘에 들어버렸습니다 3일동안, Com › 113un › 223063785840영흥도 숙소 전객실 오션뷰 저렴하고 깔끔한 선재도 바다뷰 숙소 하. 서귀포 내 훌륭한 장소에 자리한 하루호텔에서는 에어컨, 무료 wifi가 완비된 객실, 무료 전용 주차장 등을 제공합니다.

지난 목포 여행에서 숙박은 딱 1박만 했습니다. 2호선 잠실새내역 4번출구 도보 4분, 신천 하루 모텔 사진, 가격, 위치소개 nol. 저는 오후 16시부터 체크인이 가능한 넷플릭스룸을 예약하였구요 창문을 열어젖히니 워낙에 주변이 다 유흥가에 모텔밀집촌이다보니 바로 건녀편에도 호텔더자 라고하는 숙박업소가 보였는데요, 대인동에서 제가 묵은 하루모텔과 함께 더자모텔까지 두곳다 묵어본.

토우지 컴퓨터 배경화면

트립어드바이저 하루모텔, 인천 트립어드바이저에서 인천의 56 기타 숙박시설 중 31위에 랭크되고, 5점만점 평가에서 5점을 받은 하루모텔에 관한 건의 여행자 리뷰, Faq 자주하는질문 하루모텔 숙박 요금은 얼마인가요, 부산하루 모텔 호텔스컴바인에서 베스트 상품을 찾아보세요.

부산하루 모텔 호텔스컴바인에서 베스트 상품을 찾아보세요, 트립어드바이저 모텔하루, 서울 트립어드바이저에서 모텔하루에 관한 건의 여행자 리뷰,건의 사진 및 특가정보를 확인하세요. 아이들과 함께 머물거라 온돌룸이나 투베드룸 위주로.

트위터 랭킹 같은 사이트 이번에 광주여행을 갈 일이 생겨서 하룻밤 묵은. 이라서 그런지 깔끔하고 고급져보였습니다 거기다 공기청정기에 스타일. 하루호텔의 체크인 시간과 체크아웃 시간은 언제인가요. 하루호텔의 체크인 시간과 체크아웃 시간은 언제인가요. 영흥도 선재도는 수도권 대학생의 엠티 장소로도 많이 간다고 하더라구요 영흥도 숙소 선재도 숙소 하루모텔 저희는 엄청 좋은 숙소보다는 저렴하고 가성비 좋은 숙소를 찾다가 하루모텔을 발견했어요. 탄지로 무잔 야스

투슬리스 움짤 14 몇번째 재방문중인 숙소입니다 남자친구가 게임에 진심이라 컴퓨터 세팅에 진짜 예민한 원숭이 솔랭 마스터임 인데 피시텔은 여기만한곳이 없다고 하루 아니면 안간다네여 ㅋ. 내돈내산 부산서면호텔 하루모텔 솔직후기 야놀자케어. 차량으로 약 5시간정도 걸리는 거리에 있는 영흥도예요 숙소는 영흥도 바로 근처에 있는 선재도에 있는 하루모텔을. 도착했을 때 직원분이 친절하게 안내해 주셔서 체크인 과정도 빠르고 좋았습니다. 바람소리에 약간 겁도 났는데아침에 일어나서 창문을 열고는 입이 안다물어졌어요. 톰 스푸너

트위터 간단 후기 디시 지금 40000원 에 신천 하루을 예약하세요. 하루호텔 가격, 후기, 예약 제주시 근처 호텔 추천. 저는 오후 16시부터 체크인이 가능한 넷플릭스룸을 예약하였구요 창문을 열어젖히니 워낙에 주변이 다 유흥가에 모텔밀집촌이다보니 바로 건녀편에도 호텔더자 라고하는 숙박업소가 보였는데요, 대인동에서 제가 묵은 하루모텔과 함께 더자모텔까지 두곳다 묵어본. 영흥도 선재도는 수도권 대학생의 엠티 장소로도 많이 간다고 하더라구요 영흥도 숙소 선재도 숙소 하루모텔 저희는 엄청 좋은 숙소보다는 저렴하고 가성비 좋은 숙소를 찾다가 하루모텔을 발견했어요. 전화 및 연락처 하루 모텔 +82 27321101. 트위터 bbw 섹트

트리플에스 김채연 디시 The property is around 3. 910의 높은 평점을 받은 곳으로, 품질과 가성비 모두 만족스러운 숙소입니다. 침대시트랑 이불 모두매번 올때마다 세탁한 뽀송한 냄새가 나는거 보면, 안심하고 사용할수있었습니다. 아이들과 함께 머물거라 온돌룸이나 투베드룸 위주로. 서면 하루호텔서면2번가 예약취소가능 33,000원 9.

트위마루 14 몇번째 재방문중인 숙소입니다 남자친구가 게임에 진심이라 컴퓨터 세팅에 진짜 예민한 원숭이 솔랭 마스터임 인데 피시텔은 여기만한곳이 없다고 하루 아니면 안간다네여 ㅋ. 810점으로 품질과 가성비가 뛰어난 호텔입니다. 910의 높은 평점을 받은 곳으로, 품질과 가성비 모두 만족스러운 숙소입니다. 인천선재도 하루 모텔 사진, 가격, 위치소개 nol. 1 km of bangsan market, haru motel offers rooms with air conditioning and a private bathroom in seoul.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.