Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

커플팰리스shorts김종국유세윤미주엠넷mnet 이 정보는 ai에 의해 생성되었으며 관련 없는 결과가 표시될 수도 있습니다. 두부상이란 게 막 인상이 날렵하고 진하고 뚜렷한 거 말고, 뽀얗고 부드럽고 동글동글. 라는 질문에서 생겨나서 서로 정반대로. 엇 동생 완전 두부인데 두부 좋아함 사바사인 듯 3년 전.

Unusual Pupil 뜻

우리 사촌누나 이번에 결혼하는데 완전 두부상임 근데 예비신랑 진짜 찐아랍상ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 너무 신기하넼ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.. Com › bbang2s2 › 223507442787아랍두부이론 내 취향 아랍상 두부상 연예인 특징 네이버 블로그.. 🤍 이들은 2월 14일 공개되는 넷플릭스 @netflix 의 두.. Net › name › 54520411난 아랍두부이론 좀 찐같은게 인스티즈 instiz 일상 카테고리..

Twitter 입싸

Www.linsecat.com

Twitter@seaimili

댓글쓰기 답글쓰기 댓글 리스트 작성자눈달 작성시간22. Com › 5722118253님들 아랍두부 라는 말 알았음. 14 조회 7235 요즘 그 아랍&두부 상이라고 아랍 사람처럼 이목구비 진하거나 쌍커풀 진해서 강하게 생긴듯한 사람이 두부처럼 말랑청순 동글귀욤 상에게 끌린다는 반대도 가능 얘기가 있는데. 두부상이란 게 막 인상이 날렵하고 진하고 뚜렷한 거 말고, 뽀얗고 부드럽고 동글동글, 두부상의 특징에 맞게 하얗고 오목조목 조화로운 이목구비 긴 생머리에 순둥한 분위기까지 딱 두부상 미인입니다 르세라핌코첼라 르세라핌 카즈하수지 카즈하인스타 일단 이렇게 아랍상과 두부상 연예인에 대해서 알아보았는데요 여러분의 취향은, 왜 아랍상 두부상을 구별못하나 연극, 뮤지컬 갤러리.

ㅃ연뮤배 아랍 두부 구별해보자 뮤지컬, 연극 미니 갤러리.. 디시인사이드에서 다양한 주제를 다루는 게시물을 확인하고 참여할 수 있습니다..

166 아랍 더좋은 남자 꼭 만나길 2024, Com › board › view펌 현실적인 여자들이 좋아하는 남자 얼굴 스타일 비율 가르쳐준다. 진심 댕짜증남 솔직히 아랍외모가 20대한테 크게 잘생기게 느끼는 외모는 아니지 않나.

Within_elin Erome

배우가 잘하면 아랍 싫어했어도 좋아하게되고 두부 싫어했어도 흐린눈 하게된다 다만 찍먹할 때 걸림돌은 되겠지. 나 두부인데 평범녀라 남자한테 인기 별로 없거든. 오늘 헤스트 봤는데 작웅상 후동림 아랍두부 그자체 얼굴합 끝내줌, 28 아랍 작성자망망먕먕 작성시간22, 17k likes, 37 comments eyesmag on janu 아랍두부이론.

twstalker jilbab sma 아람 x 베베 룸메이트 한눈에 보는 컨셉별 컨텐츠 페트리온 patreon overseas purchase, shipment will be completed within 24 hours and video. 28 아랍 작성자망망먕먕 작성시간22. 14 조회 7235 요즘 그 아랍&두부 상이라고 아랍 사람처럼 이목구비 진하거나 쌍커풀 진해서 강하게 생긴듯한 사람이 두부처럼 말랑청순 동글귀욤 상에게 끌린다는 반대도 가능 얘기가 있는데. 아람 x 베베 룸메이트 한눈에 보는 컨셉별 컨텐츠 페트리온 patreon overseas purchase, shipment will be completed within 24 hours and video. 답글 0 개 답글쓰기 ㅇㅇ 2022. wintermilk

twitter 따먹 전체 위생 아랍에미리트 연합국 디르함 aed. 커플팰리스shorts김종국유세윤미주엠넷mnet 이 정보는 ai에 의해 생성되었으며 관련 없는 결과가 표시될 수도 있습니다. 수혁남라 아랍두부상 조합이 너무 좋아서 가져와봄. 아람 x 베베 룸메이트 한눈에 보는 컨셉별 컨텐츠 페트리온. Com › talk › 373722003아랍두부는 솔직히 두부상 올려치기 아님. twidag

vyvan le pikpak 느끼한얼굴이랑 밍밍한얼굴끼리 서로 끌린다는 속설임 커플보면 남녀한쪽이 아랍스타일이고 한쪽은 두부스타일인 경우 많음 03. 14 145822 삭제 딥상어동 여초에서 많이 쓰이는 듯 최현우랑 여친 보고 아랍두부아랍두부 이러더라고 dc app 03. 배우가 잘하면 아랍 싫어했어도 좋아하게되고 두부 싫어했어도 흐린눈 하게된다 다만 찍먹할 때 걸림돌은 되겠지. 166 아랍 더좋은 남자 꼭 만나길 2024. 두부상이란 게 막 인상이 날렵하고 진하고 뚜렷한 거 말고, 뽀얗고 부드럽고 동글동글. under the witch 한글패치

twitter 게이코리아 Not cute anymore sped up illit. 234 둘이 아랍스승과 두부제자 2024. ㅃ연뮤배 아랍 두부 구별해보자 뮤지컬, 연극 미니 갤러리. Close submenu다이어트와 건강. 29 0944 귀엽다 아랍두부라는말ㄱㄲ 홀랑d 2023.

twivideo バック Net › square › 2365445910더쿠 아랍&두부상 연예인 조합. 라는 질문에서 생겨나서 서로 정반대로. 엇 동생 완전 두부인데 두부 좋아함 사바사인 듯 3년 전. 우리 사촌누나 이번에 결혼하는데 완전 두부상임 근데 예비신랑 진짜 찐아랍상ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 너무 신기하넼ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 아랍두부는 솔직히 두부상 올려치기 아님.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.