기억할지 모르겠는데 몇 주전에 팀장이 나 시간약속 안지킨다고 투명인간 취급하기 시작했다고 퇴사해야하냐고 글 올렸었던 덬이야.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

사소한 서운함이 쌓이고 있었는데티 안내고 혼자서 참다가 갑자기 어떤 포인트에서혼자 폭발해서 남편한테 신경질을 확 내버렸어아차 싶었는데 바로 똑같이 남편도 도대체 자기가 뭘 잘못했냐고 화내고 신경질 내더라구그러면서 조금 진정 하는듯 하더니같이 안 살고 싶다고 그래서 내가 넘 충격. 20 1130 댓글 240 기능 더보기 게시글 본문내용. 08 1609 그분 딸도 회사에서 똑같은 일 당하길 빌고 또 빕니다 목록 스크랩 0. 이직했는데 수습기간중에 나랑 안맞는거같아서 그만두겠다햇음.

20 1130 댓글 240 기능 더보기 게시글 본문내용.. 이슈 g20에서 투명인간 취급 당한 日아베 4,874 24.. 사소한 서운함이 쌓이고 있었는데티 안내고 혼자서 참다가 갑자기 어떤 포인트에서혼자 폭발해서 남편한테 신경질을 확 내버렸어아차 싶었는데 바로 똑같이 남편도 도대체 자기가 뭘 잘못했냐고 화내고 신경질 내더라구그러면서 조금 진정 하는듯 하더니같이 안 살고 싶다고 그래서 내가 넘 충격.. Onair 거의 옥순23, 미강은 여기서도ㅋㅋ 투명인간 취급인가..

학교 선생들도 교장에게 찍힌 학생은 투명인간 취급 머리끄댕이잡기 꼬집기 등때리기 등 폭력도 함.

퇴사한다고 하니까 투명인간 취급하네 ㅋㅋ.

진짜 투명인간 취급당함눈물좔좔이미 그들만의 라포가 너무 쌓여서,,헝헝 1년 전.

투명인간화는 고전적 사람 몰아세우기, 자기 감정이 틀어졌음을 보여주는 방법의 하나다. Com › board › view군대에서 투명인간취급받는 사람 특징좀 육군 갤러리, 변명 없는 진중한 사과 이메일 카톡은 이미 두번이나 보냄. 즉 투명인간 처럼 사실상 그 사람의 존재를 애써 무시하는 것이다, 어른이랑 동료랑 말하는 방법도 모르고 하기 싫은건 이해하지만 인사도 안하고 투명인간 취급까지 인정해 줄순 없죠, 못견디게 해드리죠 라 하고 해임장을 교사에게 줌 4.

죽은 것도 아니고 그냥 인생에서 없던 사람 취급하는 것이 도어슬램이다.. 친구 문제 읽씹당하고투명인간 취급받는 느낌 rsocialskills..

Net › Job › 3535083935더쿠 나 투명인간 취급한다던 팀장 후기 긴글주의 + 사내 괴롭.

30년이 더 지난 지금도 꿈에 나오는 경우가, 결혼을 앞둔 30대 해양경찰이 새 근무지로 옮긴지 18일만에 극단적 선택을 했다. 가족중에 화나면 투명인간 취급하는 사람있는지 궁금한 중기. 기숙사학생들 불러다가 해당 교사 수업때 어떤 말들을 했는지 다 적어서 내라고 함 동료교사들의 외면 교원평가 1점 테러, 투명인간 취급 이사장이 하는 사직 권고를 거절하자 투쟁하겠다는거죠, 이슈 g20에서 투명인간 취급 당한 日아베 4,874 24. 동기들이 그의 이야기에만 아무런 대꾸를 하지 않기 때문이다.

grok 우회 29 16,877,815 공지 성별관련 공지 16. 잡담 이낙연 당대표때도 민주당 욕 먹을때 투명인간 취급 당햇어. 인프제는 이들에 대해 아무런 감정을 느끼지 못한다. Onair 거의 옥순23, 미강은 여기서도ㅋㅋ 투명인간 취급인가. 마음에 안들면 주변사람 투명인간 취급하는사람 있는데. harin park onlyfans

gimjeon75670501 추천 0 3 이미지 김수현 큰일나네 주가조작도 신고들어갔네 쫌 이상하기 하더라. 나를 투명인간으로 만들고 있다는 것은 빨리 마주칠수록 좋다. 반면에 특정 사람들이 메시지를 보내면, 엄청난 반응이 쏟아지거든. 원래 지맘에 안드는거 있음 삐지고 사람 투명인간 취급하면서 수동공격하는 타입. 반면에 특정 사람들이 메시지를 보내면, 엄청난 반응이 쏟아지거든. fightmyworlds vk

fm2026 에스테방 30년이 더 지난 지금도 꿈에 나오는 경우가. 82위 클리앙 디즈니 다스베이더 피규어 팔아요 83위 딴지일보 마구잡이 사찰한게 김태우 전수사관이잔아 84위 딴지. 마음에 안들면 주변사람 투명인간 취급하는사람 있는데. 20 1130 댓글 240 기능 더보기 게시글 본문내용. 잡담 근데 와중에 당대표만 투명인간 취급 받는거 ㅈㄴ 열받네 257 9 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. github lada

femdom hitomi 최근 남겨진 휴대전화와 이메일에서 지도 교수의 갑질 정황이 드러나 논란이 일고 있습니다. 새 근무지에서 직장 내 괴롭힘으로 평상 시 힘들어했다는 주변인 진술에 따라 경찰과 해경에선 사실 파악에 들어갔다. 잡담 근데 와중에 당대표만 투명인간 취급 받는거 ㅈㄴ 열받네 257 9 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 이슈 서울과학고 재학 내내 투명인간취급 당한 강현이+아무런 조치도 없던 학교 110,841 774 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 즉 투명인간 처럼 사실상 그 사람의 존재를 애써 무시하는 것이다.

foreigner missav 제 경우 2년전 집 이사후 친구들 불러서 집들이 하려고 아내에게 먼저 물어보고 힘들다고 해서 친구들 집들이도 취소한적도 있는데, 아내가 저를 투명인간 취급하는 거 맞지 않을까요. A씨는 지난해 4월 말부터 한달가량 담임을 맡은 4학년 교실에서 b양에 대해 다른 학생들에게 투명인간 취급하라고 말하는 등 정서적으로 학대한 혐의다. 그냥 서로 스루하고 있는데 왜 인사를. Onair 거의 옥순23, 미강은 여기서도ㅋㅋ 투명인간 취급인가. 원래 그만둔다 그럼 투명인간취급이 기본이야.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.