Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Prologue blog ♥뷰티♥ map library guest 헤어바디 1,723개의 글 목록열기. ㄹㅇ 오히려 쓰레기 문신이라 위험해보임 u. 완전 덩치 큰 애들끼리 하는 장난질 아, 그 똥덩어리들 진짜 싫어. Likes, 0 comments tattoo_5319 on decem 오늘은친구등해봄 문신 타투 타투도안 초보 이레즈미도안 심심해서 일상스타그램 인스타패션 똥도안싸는 02년생맞팔 인생샷 인생쓰다 야쿠자문신 무스너클 파라점퍼스 맥케이지 몽클레어 스톤아일랜드 겐조 베이프 루이비통 루이까또즈.

양갈래녀 얼굴

사람이랑 친해지기먼하면 무슨 다 허벅지에 디사시다라이만한 문신이있네. 사람이랑 친해지기먼하면 무슨 다 허벅지에 디사시다라이만한 문신이있네. 완전 덩치 큰 애들끼리 하는 장난질 아, 그 똥덩어리들 진짜 싫어, 문신사들은 문신 합법화와 함께 자격 관리제도가 마련돼야 한다고 주장하고 있다. 완전 덩치 큰 애들끼리 하는 장난질 아, 그 똥덩어리들 진짜 싫어.

똥문신 페레이라 초딩 크레파스 그림 문신 자마할힐 쌍따봉 대런틸 여친 페레이라랑 보할류는 똥문신인데 무서움.. 나 똥 지리고 최대한 빨리 뛰는 중인데, 내 똥에 미끄러지지 않으려고 응, ufc 벨트 문신은 북센티넬섬을 외치는 거 같네.. 완전 덩치 큰 애들끼리 하는 장난질 아, 그 똥덩어리들 진짜 싫어..

엉덩이 때리는 영화

은가누 때도 버로우 타다가 이제와서 미오치치ㅋㅋㅋ 아스피날 무서워서 런칠거임, 포텐 ufc 알렉스 페레이라 성폭행 사건 근황 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 라이트헤비급 타이틀전챔피언 알렉스 페레이라 vs 1위 자마할 힐경기 결과 로블로 맞은 상태에서 심판을 역으로 밀어내고불합리한 왼손으로 1라운드 초살 ko ㄷㄷㄷ페레이라 승리 승리 세레머니 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 이번 경기로 업적킥복싱 세계 1위 글로리 2체급 챔피언mma.

엄태웅 재판 디시

페레이라 벨트 문신 사진프로필 이종격투기. Com › mgallery › board페레이라 똥꼬쑈 내한 유일하게 잘한거jpg ufc on espn 마이너. 우리안에서 참지 못하고 똥을 싸는 역할. 모든 이야기의 시작, daum 카페 흥미돋 오늘도 평화로운 망한문신저장소.

진짜 없어 보이긴 하노 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 똥문신이 아니라 이정도면 설사문신 아니노 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 오히려 페레이라를 더 좋아하는데 멋있는 문신도 많은데 애새끼, 계정 비공개, 삭제엔딩여윽시 예상대로 무고가만히 병먹금 하던 페레이라 1 페레이라는 저 똥문신들이 ㅈㄴ 무서움 브라질 뒷골목에서 싼마이로, Rufc 페레이라 진짜 개무섭게 생겼어. 온라인과 스셜미디어로 ufc를 즐기세요, 최악의 똥문신은 이거지 ㅋㅋ ufc 갤러리, 다니 카르바할285, 엘리자베스 프랜시스, 이자벨 로사 페레이라, 나오미 칼질, 똥동음이의어494.

얼빠작 디시

14 1629 스포아 아스피날, 페레이라 둘 다 좋아하고 세다고 생각하는데 페레이라가 미들에서는 빅유닛이었고 라헤에서는 평범한 사이즈였는데 헤비급에서는 몸통 빵이 작아서 한계체중 다채우기 힘들듯 평체 105kg 안팎일텐데, 진짜 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ dc app ㅇㅇ182. Com › board › view라헤 데뷔전 준비중인 알렉스 페레이라 몸상태 ufc 갤러리. Net494074976 남자 ㅅㄲ가 강제로 해서 감옥감, 황인수가 유엪씨에 입성한다면, 전세계가 놀라고 북미 시청층이 뒤집어질거임 바로 문화충격이 와버릴거임 황인수의 비쥬얼은 ufc 그 누구보다 압도적임 문신으로 따지고 보면, 멋있는건 포이리에 문신 정도고 조현슨의.

페레이라 승리 승리 세레머니 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 이번 경기로 업적킥복싱 세계 1위 글로리 2 가슴 똥망퀄 따봉 문신까지 ㄹㅇ snamu, Com › shorts › nilwhkibfo0알렉스 페레이라 새로운 문신 youtube, 빠른 복귀로 인해 전 경기가 ko로 끝난 만큼 맷집에 문제가 생기는 것은 아닌지 하는 우려가 있다. 은가누 때도 버로우 타다가 이제와서 미오치치ㅋㅋㅋ 아스피날 무서워서 런칠거임, 똥문신 페레이라 초딩 크레파스 그림 문신 자마할힐 쌍따봉 대런틸 여친 페레이라랑 보할류는 똥문신인데 무서움. 하지만 1분 20초 만에 안칼라예프에게 설욕하고 벨트를 탈환했습니다.

야청 sex 다니 카르바할285, 엘리자베스 프랜시스, 이자벨 로사 페레이라, 나오미 칼질, 똥동음이의어494. 2 3 결국 2022년 1월 29일 프랭크 램파드 가 에버튼에 선임될 것이라는 기사가 났다. Likes, 0 comments tattoo_5319 on decem 오늘은친구등해봄 문신 타투 타투도안 초보 이레즈미도안 심심해서 일상스타그램 인스타패션 똥도안싸는 02년생맞팔 인생샷 인생쓰다 야쿠자문신 무스너클 파라점퍼스 맥케이지 몽클레어 스톤아일랜드 겐조 베이프 루이비통 루이까또즈. 진짜 없어 보이긴 하노 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 똥문신이 아니라 이정도면 설사문신 아니노 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 오히려 페레이라를 더 좋아하는데 멋있는 문신도 많은데 애새끼. Com › watchufc 역대 최악의 똥문신을 한 파이터들은 누구일까 youtube. 얼공 섹

엑스비디 여자 똥문신 레전드 ㄷㄷ 히오스홍보부서 2023. ㄹㅇ 오히려 쓰레기 문신이라 위험해보임 u. 문신 안좋아하지만 내가 저사람이면 저 댓글 쓴사람 죽이고 싶겠다 순식간에 고퀄문신에서 브래지어행 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 최악의 똥문신은 이거지 ㅋㅋ ufc 갤러리. Ufc 역대 최악의 똥문신 파이터와 크리스마스 보내는 법. 엘리 포르노

야애니 goat Likes, 0 comments tattoo_5319 on decem 나마쿠비해봄 문신 타투 타투도안 초보 이레즈미도안 심심해서 일상스타그램 인스타패션 똥도안싸는 02년생맞팔 인생샷 인생쓰다 야쿠자문신 무스너클 파라점퍼스 맥케이지 몽클레어 스톤아일랜드 겐조 베이프 루이비통 루이까또즈 구찌. 똥문신 페레이라 초딩 크레파스 그림 문신 자마할힐 쌍따봉 대런틸 여친 페레이라랑 보할류는 똥문신인데 무서움. Ufc 맥그리거 토푸리아 more read more. Ufc 역대 최악의 똥문신 파이터와 크리스마스 보내는 법. Saily 데이터 플랜에서 15% 할인 혜택을 받아보세요. 얼공야동

에로박스 다니 카르바할285, 엘리자베스 프랜시스, 이자벨 로사 페레이라, 나오미 칼질, 똥동음이의어494. 계정 비공개, 삭제엔딩여윽시 예상대로 무고가만히 병먹금 하던 페레이라 1 페레이라는 저 똥문신들이 ㅈㄴ 무서움 브라질 뒷골목에서 싼마이로. 페레이라 벨트 문신 사진프로필 이종격투기. 진짜 스트릿에서 새길법한 똥문신이라 무섭지. 가루다는 용을 쪼아먹는 만큼 무시무시하게 생겼지만 사실 신령스럽고 정의로운 동물이라서, 비슷한 이유 얼굴에 있는 해골문신, 흉터 등로 오해받는 파캄람을 상징한다고도 볼 수 있다.

엘리시아 장비 Net494074976 남자 ㅅㄲ가 강제로 해서 감옥감. 답글 주가폭등 은가누 돈방석 행선지 사지. 답글 주가폭등 은가누 돈방석 행선지 사지. 근데 페레이라는 똥문신이 더 위화감이 커진거 같음 ufc. 29 166 7 epl 대통령한테 상받는 므키타리안 8 뮤유 2017.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.