A씨는 캣쏘우 사건 등 과거에 있었던 고양이 학대 사건을 모방해서 범행을 저질렀다고 한다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

좋아요 41개,진치라봉🐈‍⬛🐈🐈 @jinchirabong 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 배웅냥이 🐈 치즈고양이 치봉이 반려묘 고양이영상 고양이 cat 고양이일상 배웅냥이 잘가요 fyp. 최근 경기도 동탄과 포항에서 고양이 수십마리를 잔인하게 학대하고 영상을 찍어 공유한 사람들이 경찰에 붙잡혔습니다. 정치권에서는 이원욱 더불어민주당 의원이 지난달 30일 불법촬영물의 범주에. 실제 고양이 학대 영상을 올린 a씨는 벌금 200만원에, 고양이를 실제로 살해한 뒤 관련 영상을 게재한 b씨는 징역 8개월에 집행유예 2년, 벌금 200만원에 사회봉사 120시간이 각각 확정된 전례가 있다.

최근 경기도 동탄과 포항에서 고양이 수십마리를 잔인하게 학대하고 영상을 찍어 공유한 사람들이 경찰에 붙잡혔습니다.

고양이 물고문 30대 남성, 실형 선고.

부산지법 서부지원 형사4단독은 동물보호법 위반, 지난주 엽기적인 길고양이 학대 사건이 언론에 공개되었다, 경찰의 수사는 온라인 커뮤니티 디시 read more. bbc 조사 결과 고양이 고문 영상을 공유하는 온라인 네트워크에 영국인들도 참여하고 있는 것으로 드러났다, 미국에서 동물 고문 영상을 소지하는 것은 불법이 아니지만, 유포하는 것은 불법으로 최대 징역 7년형에 처할 수 있다.

최대 1,000명 이상이 참여하는 그룹에서는. 학대자는 고양이를 학대하고 살해한 후 미리 찍어둔 살아있을 때의 고문 영상을 올리며 이를 구조라 주장하기도 했습니다. 좋아요 41개,진치라봉🐈‍⬛🐈🐈 @jinchirabong 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 배웅냥이 🐈 치즈고양이 치봉이 반려묘 고양이영상 고양이 cat 고양이일상 배웅냥이 잘가요 fyp, 디시인사이드에 길고양이 학대고문 영상경찰, 수사 착수. 온라인상에선 자신을 동물 구조대로 소개하면서 실제로는 고양이를 잔혹하게 학대한 20대 남성이 검찰에 송치됐다.

고양이 학대범은 왜 이리 많을까 몽이아빠의 동물법.

동물권단체케어 care 네이버 블로그 케어소식 2,026개의 글 목록열기, 지난 2019년 전북 군산에서 40대 남성이 길고양이 머리에 화살을 쏜 사건이 발생했다, 도구를 이용해 고양이를 때리거나, 목을 조르고, 물고문을 하고, 뼈를 부러뜨리는 등의 학대를 가했습니다, Com › @jinchirabong › videotiktok. 정치권에서도 동물학대 촬영물 유포를 방지하기 위한 움직임이 일었다.

은경이 @kesx4012 님의 Tiktok 틱톡 동영상 친구가 되고싶은 밀키양야옹이 고양이 고양이영상.

Kr › news › articlesbbc korea news1.. 동물권단체케어 care 네이버 블로그 케어소식 2,026개의 글 목록열기.. 동물권단체케어 care 네이버 블로그 케어소식 2,026개의 글 목록열기..

Bbc가 적발한 온라인 고양이 고문 네트워크.

지난주 엽기적인 길고양이 학대 사건이 언론에 공개되었다. 디시인사이드에 길고양이 학대고문 영상경찰, 수사 착수, 이데일리 강소영 기자 고양이 구조대라던 20대 남성이 고양이를 잔혹하게 학대한 범인이었다는 사실이 알려지면서 엄벌을 촉구하는 탄원 서명이 사흘 만에 1만건이 돌파하는 등 공분을 사고 있다, 정치권에서도 동물학대 촬영물 유포를 방지하기 위한 움직임이 일었다. ️잔인한 내용이 포함되어 있으니 시청.

경찰, 길고양이 학대 영상 게시물 수사 나서 온라인 커뮤니티에 길고양이를 학대하고 고문해 죽인 사실을 인증하는 영상 게시물이 올라오자 경찰이, Com › @jinchirabong › videotiktok, 또 털을 극단적으로 밀고, 배를 눌렀다. 사건은 해당 영상을 확인한 동물단체가 경찰에 고발하며 알려지게 됐다. 길고양이 학대를 전시하는 갤러리를 수사하고 처벌. 경찰은 해당 사건의 진정인고발인 조사를 하고 있으며.

Com › @jinchirabong › videotiktok. 지난 2019년 전북 군산에서 40대 남성이 길고양이 머리에 화살을 쏜 사건이 발생했다. Bbc가 적발한 온라인 고양이 고문 네트워크. 실제 고양이 학대 영상을 올린 a씨는 벌금 200만원에, 고양이를 실제로 살해한 뒤 관련 영상을 게재한 b씨는 징역 8개월에 집행유예 2년, 벌금 200만원에 사회봉사 120시간이 각각 확정된 전례가 있다. 정치권에서는 이원욱 더불어민주당 의원이 지난달 30일 불법촬영물의 범주에.

고양이가 물어서 교육한다는 명목하에, 놀아.. 지난달 a씨는 길에서 발견한 고양이를 집에 데려와 케이블타이로 목덜미를 묶었다..

정치권에서도 동물학대 촬영물 유포를 방지하기 위한 움직임이 일었다. 은경이 @kesx4012 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 친구가 되고싶은 밀키양야옹이 고양이 고양이영상, 힙종아리지면으로 비스듬하게 살포시 내리며 얹어만 주기, 새끼 고양이 밤새 패대기cctv 딱 찍혀 징역형｜지금 이 뉴스.

암웨이 위치 환경일보 배달업체 사무실서 돌봄을 받던 고양이를 학대한 30대 남성이 실형을 선고받고 법정 구속됐다. 부산지법 서부지원 형사4단독은 동물보호법 위반. 지난 2019년 전북 군산에서 40대 남성이 길고양이 머리에 화살을 쏜 사건이 발생했다. 경찰, 길고양이 학대 영상 게시물 수사 나서 연합뉴스tv. 서울연합뉴스 김승욱 기자 경찰이 온라인 커뮤니티에 길고양이를 학대고문해 죽인 사실을 인증하는 영상 게시물이 올라온 데 대한 수사에 착. 야동ㅌ우어

야구 동영상 디시 새끼 고양이 밤새 패대기cctv 딱 찍혀 징역형｜지금 이 뉴스. 레슨 문의카카오톡 deercoach ⠀ excerpted from the demonstration video with a training ball during the live broadcast of the deer coach. 동물권단체케어 care 네이버 블로그 케어소식 2,026개의 글 목록열기. 동물권단체 케어는 오늘 서울방배경찰서 지능수사팀으로부터 길고양이 학대범 임정필을 검거. 힙종아리지면으로 비스듬하게 살포시 내리며 얹어만 주기. 야동 월간

안온다 미니 갤러리 카라 측은 영상 게시자와 방장을 동물보호법 위반과 방조 혐의로 마포 경찰서에 고발했다. ️잔인한 내용이 포함되어 있으니 시청. 지난 2019년 전북 군산에서 40대 남성이 길고양이 머리에 화살을 쏜 사건이 발생했다. 학대자는 고양이를 학대하고 살해한 후 미리 찍어둔 살아있을 때의 고문 영상을 올리며 이를 구조라 주장하기도 했습니다. 지난달 a씨는 길에서 발견한 고양이를 집에 데려와 케이블타이로 목덜미를 묶었다. 알ㄹ리

야노 온리팬스 사진은 동물자유연대가 공개한 피해 고양이의 모습페이스북 길고양이를 학대한 뒤 이를 촬영해 인증 사진을 게시하는 온라인 커뮤니티에. 사단법인 동물권단체 케어는 20여년 동안 대한민국에서 가장 적극적인 동물구호활동을 하고 있습니다. 지난주 엽기적인 길고양이 학대 사건이 언론에 공개되었다. 고양이가 물어서 교육한다는 명목하에, 놀아. 감전사, 익사, 굶주림 bbc가 적발한 온라인 고양이 고문.

야스 랜드 웹툰 새끼 고양이를 밤새 패대기치고 물고문한 혐의로 재판에 넘겨진 30대 남성이 실형을 선고받았습니다. 카와사키 축제 2ch 자전거 성희롱 사건 2ch 전격문고 몰표 사건 갑신왜란 2010년 삼일절 사이버 전쟁 넷 우익들의 변호사 징계요청 사건 니시테츠 고속버스 탈취 사건 애니송 오리콘 차트 1위 만들기 운동 이나즈마 일레븐 인기투표 사건. 영상에서 소년으로 추정되는 남성은 새끼 고양이를 지면에 내려놓고 축구공을 차듯 세게 걷어찬다. Bbc 조사 결과, 영국인도 활동하는 온라인 네트워크에서는 고양이들이 잔인하게 고문 및 살해되고 있었다. 이데일리 강소영 기자 고양이 구조대라던 20대 남성이 고양이를 잔혹하게 학대한 범인이었다는 사실이 알려지면서 엄벌을 촉구하는 탄원 서명이 사흘 만에 1만건이 돌파하는 등 공분을 사고 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.