Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

小学生が憧れるのは、タイトル6冠の藤井聡太 名人です。 29日、その藤井名人がこの春、青森市に来ることが発表されました。 青森市で4月に将棋. 藤井聡太名人、今年は年男 「完璧」より「面白い」将棋を目指す理由 豊島将之九段、藤井聡太名人を破って銀河戦優勝 「感覚を信じた」 岩村凛太朗四段が白星発進 藤井. Com › fujiisouta速報藤井聡太対局まとめ 将棋さんぽ. 藤井聡太 今後の対局予定 棋士・藤井聡太 今後の対局予定 最新更新 2026125 史上最年少プロ棋士である藤井聡太先生の今後の対局予定、スケジュール、最新情報をお届けします。 そしてついにタイトル八冠を達成しました！.

Com › tag › feature藤井聡太 サンスポ.. 藤井聡太 今後の対局予定 棋士・藤井聡太 今後の対局予定 最新更新 2026125 史上最年少プロ棋士である藤井聡太先生の今後の対局予定、スケジュール、最新情報をお届けします。 そしてついにタイトル八冠を達成しました！..

토비 타신 치 시간

탑걸19

Tv › articles › 藤井聡太 速報最新対局結果・予定まとめ｜リアルタイム更新 将. Hours ago 藤井聡太七冠と将棋界の現在 2025531 宇宙とブラックホールのq&a 「3．棋聖戦、白玲戦とヒューリック」参照 1日制のタイトル戦もいくつもある中で、2日制の王将戦が序列最下位というのはいかにもバランスが悪いですね。, 藤井聡太竜王・名人は2023年度、六冠として年度初戦からタイトル戦で始動。 名人戦では渡辺明名人を4勝1敗で破り、史上最年少で名人位を獲得し羽生善治九 read more. 藤井聡太竜王・名人は2023年度、六冠として年度初戦からタイトル戦で始動。 名人戦では渡辺明名人を4勝1敗で破り、史上最年少で名人位を獲得し羽生善治九 read more, 藤井聡太のニュース・速報・結果 将棋・名人戦4月25、26日に青森で開催 nhk eテレ『加藤一二三という男、ありけり。』 青森市内で将棋の名人戦が行われることを発表した.

Jp › theme › pvswbfjc6jコーナー「藤井聡太」の最新ニュース｜西日本新聞me, 名人戦, 3連覇, 4月 防衛戦 七番勝負. Com › tag › feature藤井聡太 サンスポ. 「絶対見に行きたい！」将棋少年も歓喜！ 「名人戦」が47年ぶり. 藤井聡太王将「苦しい展開が続いた」永瀬拓矢九段「七番勝負の初戦で勝てたのは初めて」王将戦第1局／将棋 20260112 2012. 王座, 2期（第71期2023年度・第72期）.

「竜王」就位式 藤井六冠「光栄であると同時に重み感じている」, 藤井聡太の現在位置①藤井聡太五冠は永世称号を獲得するのにあと何期必要か？ 棋戦ごとにまとめてみたゆっくり解説 将棋藤井聡太の現在位置 2 2022年度を, B級2組, 17歳, 2020年2月4日. 名人戦, 3連覇, 4月 防衛戦 七番勝負, 王座, 2期（第71期2023年度・第72期）.

트위터 곧휴가철

2月2日 増田康宏八段 棋王戦第1局 2月5、6日 永瀬拓矢九段 王将戦第3局 2月15、16日 永瀬拓矢九段 王将戦第4局 2月22日 増田康宏八段 棋王戦第2局 3月2日 増田康宏八段 棋王戦第3局 3月8、9日 永瀬拓矢九段 王将戦第5局 3月16日 増田康宏八段 棋王戦第4局 3月21、22日 永瀬拓矢九段 王将戦第6局 3月26日 増田康宏八段 棋王戦第5局 3月29、30日 永瀬拓矢九段 王将戦第7局.. 藤井聡太 速報最新対局結果・予定まとめ｜リアルタイム更新.. Com › fujiisouta速報藤井聡太対局まとめ 将棋さんぽ.. Jp › shogi › fujiisota藤井聡太 毎日新聞..

藤井聡太 速報最新対局結果・予定まとめ｜リアルタイム更新. 藤井聡太の現在位置①藤井聡太五冠は永世称号を獲得するのにあと何期必要か？ 棋戦ごとにまとめてみたゆっくり解説 将棋藤井聡太の現在位置 2 2022年度を. プロの 将棋 界は勝ち続けるほど対局も増えるため、藤井聡太竜王・名人は8期連続で年間50局以上をこなしています。 ここでは藤井聡太竜王・名人の対局予定や、その対局の 速報 が確認できるサービスなどをご紹介します。, Hours ago 藤井聡太七冠と将棋界の現在 2025531 宇宙とブラックホールのq&a 「3．棋聖戦、白玲戦とヒューリック」参照 1日制のタイトル戦もいくつもある中で、2日制の王将戦が序列最下位というのはいかにもバランスが悪いですね。.

트위터 떡감 藤井聡太を忖度なしで応援するブログ 史上最年少プロ将棋. 藤井聡太名人、今年は年男 「完璧」より「面白い」将棋を目指す理由 豊島将之九段、藤井聡太名人を破って銀河戦優勝 「感覚を信じた」 岩村凛太朗四段が白星発進 藤井. Jp › shogi › fujiisota藤井聡太 毎日新聞. 王座, 2期（第71期2023年度・第72期）. Jp › player › pro藤井聡太｜棋士データベース｜日本将棋連盟. 트위터 레드 딕 디시

텔레그램 suzu プロの 将棋 界は勝ち続けるほど対局も増えるため、藤井聡太竜王・名人は8期連続で年間50局以上をこなしています。 ここでは藤井聡太竜王・名人の対局予定や、その対局の 速報 が確認できるサービスなどをご紹介します。. 「竜王」就位式 藤井六冠「光栄であると同時に重み感じている」. Hours ago 2026年1月25日に京都府の伏見稲荷大社で行われた第75期王将戦七番勝負第2局の藤井聡太王将と永瀬拓矢九段のタイトル戦は111手までで藤井聡太王将が勝利し王将5連覇まであと3勝となりました。. 藤井聡太王将「苦しい展開が続いた」永瀬拓矢九段「七番勝負の初戦で勝てたのは初めて」王将戦第1局／将棋 20260112 2012. 24 土25 日 王将戦 第2局 藤井聡太 永瀬拓矢 9時～棋譜速報 1. 트위터 김리리 근황

트위터 harang Hours ago 2026年1月25日に京都府の伏見稲荷大社で行われた第75期王将戦七番勝負第2局の藤井聡太王将と永瀬拓矢九段のタイトル戦は111手までで藤井聡太王将が勝利し王将5連覇まであと3勝となりました。. 棋聖, 6期（第91期2020年度・92～96期） －. 藤井聡太名人、今年は年男 「完璧」より「面白い」将棋を目指す理由 豊島将之九段、藤井聡太名人を破って銀河戦優勝 「感覚を信じた」 岩村凛太朗四段が白星発進 藤井. Days ago alsok杯第75期王将戦七番勝負（毎日新聞社、スポーツニッポン新聞社特別協力）の第2局を制した藤井聡太王将（23）が対局直後の25日夜、スポニチ. 小学生が憧れるのは、タイトル6冠の藤井聡太 名人です。 29日、その藤井名人がこの春、青森市に来ることが発表されました。 青森市で4月に将棋. 트위터 고어

탑팔라스 유푸 藤井聡太を忖度なしで応援するブログ 史上最年少プロ将棋. 藤井聡太名人、今年は年男 「完璧」より「面白い」将棋を目指す理由 豊島将之九段、藤井聡太名人を破って銀河戦優勝 「感覚を信じた」 岩村凛太朗四段が白星発進 藤井. 藤井聡太の現在位置①藤井聡太五冠は永世称号を獲得するのにあと何期必要か？ 棋戦ごとにまとめてみたゆっくり解説 将棋藤井聡太の現在位置 2 2022年度を. 24 土25 日 王将戦 第2局 藤井聡太 永瀬拓矢 9時～棋譜速報 1. 棋聖, 6期（第91期2020年度・92～96期） －.

택시 야노 트위터 Days ago 「藤井聡太」に関するこれまで扱われたニュース一覧を最新順に掲載しています。 王将戦、藤井が勝ち1勝1敗に 将棋の第75期王将戦7番勝負第2局. Com › fujiisouta速報藤井聡太対局まとめ 将棋さんぽ. 王座, 2期（第71期2023年度・第72期）. Hours ago 藤井聡太 現在の状況 八大タイトル戦 一般棋戦 歴代 タイトル獲得数 登場数 獲得率 藤井聡太 八大タイトルの軌跡 藤井聡太 対局結果 1. Com › fujiisouta速報藤井聡太対局まとめ 将棋さんぽ.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.