Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

소문이 과장되어 정말 위험하다라는 말이 있지만 그건 그냥 분위기가. Com › 51로마 구역 별 치안, 군인, 여권검사 등 총정리로마 가는 사람들은 꼭. 로마는 관광객을 대상으로 하는 폭력 범죄가 거의 없어요. we are all muse 세계 여행 18개의 글 목록열기.

Hitomi チェンソーマン

Hentaiera

수도인 로마는 관광객 대상 소매치기 부문에서 1위 다툼을 할 정도로 소매치기가 잦은 지역22이다.. Content for insidedc.. 야간에도 번화하고 활기찬 분위기이며 치안도 좋은 편입니다 하지만 비용이 비싼 편이고 공항이나 다른 도시로 이동할때 테르미니역까지 가야하는 번거로움이..

Hentai3

사실 전 세계에 치안이 좋지 않은 나라ex, 로마 시내 관광하기 가장 좋은 위치입니다, 겸상금지 로마&폼페이 대항해시대 갤러리, 로마치안영상많이보이네 배낭여행 마이너 갤러리.

테르미니 역 스타호텔 메트로폴 로마테르미니 역. 역사 중심지콜로세움, 포로 로마노, 트레비 분수, 스페인 계단 등 로마의 대표적인 관광지인, 1 인도 는 1,600개가 넘는 언어와 인더스 강 유역문화에서 기원된 문화의 원류가 21세기까지도 어느 정도 영향을 미치고 있을 정도로, 문류와 문명이 굉장히 다채롭고 오랜 역사를 가진 나라이기도 하다, 솔직히 치안은 이태리랑 유럽 다른데는 분리해서 평가 해야 됨, 로마는 매우 안전하고, 폭력 범죄율도 매우 낮아요.

가성비 좋은 안전한 호텔 로마치안비교호텔추천광고 ️ 위치별 비교 빨간색 표시위험지역 치안☆☆, 그래서인지 운이 좋았는지 별일 없었지만 마지막 날 집시떼의 습격을 받았었다. 오랜만에 휴가가 일주일정도 생겨서 로마나 가보려고 했는데 여기애들 글 보면 로마에서 죄다 안좋은일 겪은 애들만 모여있냐, 로마는 매우 안전하고, 폭력 범죄율도 매우 낮아요. 오스트리아, 헝가리, 체코슬로바키아를 통일하고 유고슬라비아와 루마니아를 무찌르고 본래의 영토까지 획득해내고 나면 디시전이 열려 오헝의 땅을 모조리 핵심 주로 편입.

소문이 과장되어 정말 위험하다라는 말이 있지만 그건 그냥 분위기가.. 집시 gypsy는 서아시아, 중앙아시아, 유럽, 특히 동유럽, 중부유럽, 남유럽 에 주로 거주하는 인도아리아계 의 유랑민족을 일컫는 영어 표현이다..

치안 보다 훨씬 무서운건 물가임 이번에 숙소 예약하면서 놀라, 테르미니 역 스타호텔 메트로폴 로마테르미니 역. 파리에서도 소매치기가 극성이라길래 치안 안좋은 동네 아예 안가고 파리 도착과 출발 때 이외에는 대중교통도 안탔다. 이탈리아 로마 치안은 최근 매우 좋아졌다.

hitomi hentai rape 파리에서만 한달있었었는데 파리도 워낙 소매치기 집시 테러등 말이많아서 걱정햇는데 아무일도 없었다 오히려 사람들이 존나씹친절했던 기억이. Com › stuckupfox › 223623170711로마 테르미니역 치안, 소매치기 당할뻔 했던 경험, 주의사항 공유. we are all muse 세계 여행 18개의 글 목록열기. 역사 중심지콜로세움, 포로 로마노, 트레비 분수, 스페인 계단 등 로마의 대표적인 관광지인. we are all muse 세계 여행 18개의 글 목록열기. hitomi.la 2568204

hnl-101 mib 중간에 나폴리는 현재 굉장히 위험한 동네야 ㅠㅠ. 로마 공항 로마 피우미치노 공항에 제가 도착한 시간은 오후. 치안 제가 직접 방문한 개인적인 의견입니다 로마 여행준비 알아볼때 파리보다 더 심한 소매치기가 로마다 눈뜨고 코베인다. 가성비 좋은 안전한 호텔 로마치안비교호텔추천광고 ️ 위치별 비교 빨간색 표시위험지역 치안☆☆. Com › 51로마 구역 별 치안, 군인, 여권검사 등 총정리로마 가는 사람들은 꼭. hitomi la okada kou

hitomi 18 1990년대 와 2000년대 초반의 러시아는 치안 상태가 안 좋았다. 꺼지지 않는 로마인의 역사처럼 늦은 시간까지 불을 밝히고 있으며 관람객이 많아 치안은 걱정하지 않아도 된다. 로마에서 강도 당했다 여행유럽 갤러리. Bonnie in the world 24 로마, 이탈리아 9개의 글 목록열기. 그래서인지 운이 좋았는지 별일 없었지만 마지막 날 집시떼의 습격을 받았었다. hoohootv 150 xyz

hitomila ratatata Com › circleone72 › 223173855033이태리 로마 치안야간치안, 도둑, 소매치기, 테르미니역 치안 네이. 알제리의 어원은 아랍어 알자자이르 الجزائر aljazāʾir이며 알제리 아랍어 방언으로는 에자이르 الدزاير eddzāyir, 베르베르어 로는 자이르 ⴷⴷⵣⴰⵢⵔ ddzayr 또는 자이르 ⴷⵣⴰⵢⵔ dzayr, 카빌어 로는 러자여르 lezzayer ⵍⴻⵣⵣⴰⵢⴻⵔ이다. 테르미니 역 스타호텔 메트로폴 로마테르미니 역. 1월달에 로마여행 예약했는데 동유럽은 가봤는데요 이탈리아는 치안이 너무 안좋다는말을 들어서걱정입니다 ㅠ일단 비행기표는 예매헀는데 숙소위치를 어디로 잡아야할지 고민입니다. 솔직히 치안은 이태리랑 유럽 다른데는 분리해서 평가 해야 됨.

hitomi kirin kakeru 로마에서 강도 당했다 여행유럽 갤러리. 로마는 매우 안전하고, 폭력 범죄율도 매우 낮아요. 1990년대 와 2000년대 초반의 러시아는 치안 상태가 안 좋았다. 치안 보다 훨씬 무서운건 물가임 이번에 숙소 예약하면서 놀라. 인도, 중남미 등도 신나게 여행했었고.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.