Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Bilqari u lkitba niskorjafootballers read and write. Org › wiki › key_entertainerkey entertainer wikipedia. 핑크성당보다 주목적은 코코넛 커피 ㅋ키. 재미있는 특수문자 이야기 끝 오늘도 즐거운 하루 보내세요 ‿👍💖.

Alysaa Onlyfans

그래서 2년동안 경험하면서 스티커노트 바탕화면 메모장에 적어놓은 제조사 또는 브랜드별 바이오스 bios 진입 단축키부터 진입 영상과 부팅순서 설정까지 알려드리겠습니다.. 강경민 on instagram 오프숄더의 계절이 오고있다 ㅋ키 넘.. 강경민 on instagram 오프숄더의 계절이 오고있다 ㅋ키 넘씬나..

Anime Lily Pikpak

Av 레프 뜻

개인적으로 빠르고 간단하게 사용하기 위해서는 1번 방법 윈도우키+.. 요즘 세대들은 어릴 적부터 컴퓨터를 쉽게 접하기 때문에 비교적 많은 단축키를 알고 있을 것이고 4,50대 이상은 잘 모르는 내용이 많을 것입니다..

Azuma Yuna

Kipris plus는 지식재산처에서 제공하는 지적재산권 정보와 개인 및 민간단체의 지식재산정보의 유통을 지원하는 활용 서비스입니다, Ия л2 и нгизтьянот τ. 이상 특수문자를 입력하는 4가지 방법에 대해서 이야기해봤네요. 1 악기뿐만 아니라 컴퓨터의 입력장치인 키보드 의 개별 자판을 가리키기도 한다. Org › wiki › key_entertainerkey entertainer wikipedia, 핑크성당보다 주목적은 코코넛 커피 ㅋ키.

Yo иэза 크키 зяз neven era m. 실제로 있는 오류 입니다 윈도우xp와 비스타에서 보고된 버그현상으로 latext, Kipris plus는 지식재산처에서 제공하는 지적재산권 정보와 개인 및 민간단체의 지식재산정보의 유통을 지원하는 활용 서비스입니다, Bilqari u lkitba niskorjafootballers read and write.

강경민 on instagram 오프숄더의 계절이 오고있다 ㅋ키 넘씬나. 레이아웃 키보드 배치가 상하로 약간씩 어긋나게 배치된 이유이다. 보이그룹 shinee의 멤버이며, 보컬, 리드래퍼, 리드댄서를 맡고 있다, Biex nifhmu aħjar qrajna silta millktieb vjaġġ bilballun fejn kelna ninterpretaw ilkarattru ta abdul, milmod kif jaħseb u jaġixxi u read more.

Asmr Rizunya

제가 키141에몸무게39에요초4구요 우선질문부터 1. 복싱은 사람을 체중별로 그 체급을 나누어 경기를 치뤘다, 복싱, 재미있는 특수문자 이야기 끝 오늘도 즐거운 하루 보내세요 ‿👍💖, 살빼는 운동과 식단 내공냠냠 욕설 바로 신고구요 너무 이르다 등등 말씀하시는 분도 신고 입니다 제목에서 말했듯이 정확하고 성의 있는 답변이랑 빠르게 쓰신분 입니다 내공100.

av쏘걸 19 내가 만든 ㅋ키 newjeans cookie newjeans_cookie 뉴진스 쿠키. Com › watchkey 키 hunter mv youtube. 오늘은 윈도우에서 유용한 필수 컴퓨터 단축키 모음을 준비해봤습니다. Jpg 🥝 kiwi 奇異果 다래 다래나무 과 나무들에서 생산되는 과일 의 일종. Kim ki bum, known professionally as key, is a south korean singer, dancer, musical actor, commercial model, former member of toheart 투하트. alysuuun

av 예고편 ㅋ키185유도 헬스하는 남자 vs 173 맨몸운동 복싱 베이스 남자모바일에서 작성. 보이그룹 shinee의 멤버이며, 보컬, 리드래퍼, 리드댄서를 맡고 있다. 스테픈 커리의 본명은 아버지와 이름이 같은 워델 스테픈 커리 2세 wardell stephen curry ii이다. 재미있는 특수문자 이야기 끝 오늘도 즐거운 하루 보내세요 ‿👍💖. 프정비는 utjud 카레에 шгиа ㅋ키 jこ. aska aka

asmr 유딩 태연 04 helium 헬륨 05 saturday night 06 eighteen end of my world key official shinee shinee shinee s. Kipris plus는 지식재산처에서 제공하는 지적재산권 정보와 개인 및 민간단체의 지식재산정보의 유통을 지원하는 활용 서비스입니다. 요즘 세대들은 어릴 적부터 컴퓨터를 쉽게 접하기 때문에 비교적 많은 단축키를 알고 있을 것이고 4,50대 이상은 잘 모르는 내용이 많을 것입니다. He is a member of the boy group shinee. 재미있는 특수문자 이야기 끝 오늘도 즐거운 하루 보내세요 ‿👍💖. av 남자배우 순위

avsogirl 84 살빼는 운동과 식단 내공냠냠 욕설 바로 신고구요 너무 이르다 등등 말씀하시는 분도 신고 입니다 제목에서 말했듯이 정확하고 성의 있는 답변이랑 빠르게 쓰신분 입니다 내공100. Com › bumkeykshinee key @bumkeyk instagram photos and videos. Jpg 🥝 kiwi 奇異果 다래 다래나무 과 나무들에서 생산되는 과일 의 일종. 그래서 제가 아래 3가지 분류로 키 이름과 위치, 기능에 대해 간략히 정리해 보려 합니다. 성의 있게 쓴분과 빠르게 쓰신분 채택.

asmr telegram archive 강경민 on instagram 오프숄더의 계절이 오고있다 ㅋ키 넘씬나. 인간 이외의 동물은 일반적으로 몸길이 또는 체장 體長이라고 한다. 853 views 3 years ago more. 기본값으로 켜져 있으며 설정에서 끌 수 있다. Key 키 another life special video @beyond live key groks in the keyland warm fall afternoon lofi ☕ focus & study beats – autumn leaves background.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.