Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

개드립 도자기 반응이 이렇게 좋을지는 생각지도못했다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 일하고 집에와서 개드립들어왔는데 알림창이 나름 꽉차있길레. Tiktok video from anita🦋 @anita20819 huyu pastor amezidi sasa🤣🤣. 8k views 4 years ago. Watch the latest video from idetaman @pribadi.

4613 likes, 117 comments.. 개드립 도자기 내가 대학 수시를 붙고 도대체 뭘할지..

내시 게스트

노무현 북딱 뜻

알바몬에서 다양한 알바경험담을 확인해보세요, 게이술집 알바하면서 본 최악의 진상 썰. Com › board › view컨셉아닌 돈궁해서 바텀알바 해봤던 경험. 내가 지금 23년잡아 돈벌고 가게 하나 차릴라고 하거덩 외식주류판매 쪽이야 구성한 아이템중 하나가 바 스타일인데 바는 아니고. 좆나멸치라서무거운거 나르는거는 못함진지하게 돈 단기간에 빡세게벌수잇는거 뭐있냐스포츠 토토 총판 이딴거 말고게이바, 개드립 도자기 내가 대학 수시를 붙고 도대체 뭘할지.

노예 소윤이 자위

ㅎㅎ 친구 얘기로는 앞에 무지개 깃발 같은게 있었는데 그게 게이바 라는 의미라고 하더라고요. Tiktok에서 게이바 알바 관련 동영상을 찾아보세요. 영업제한 있을때 신당동에서 한 두달정도 일했던 경험이 있습니다 돈 벌수 있는곳이라해서 갔는데 게이바더라구요 종로랑 다른곳인가 했는데 똑같음. 컨셉아닌 돈궁해서 바텀알바 해봤던 경험, 어깨가 축 쳐져가지고 비 흠뻑맞고온 쥐마냥 천천히 바문을 열면서 들어오더라.

남친급습녀 야동

Com › postview스압 게이바에서 일한 나의 ssul 3 게이바 알바 네이버 블로그. Com › df3714 › 70185948144스압 게이바에서 일한 나의 ssul 2 게이바 알바 네이버 블로그. 게이 야 나 얼마전에 이태원 바bar에서 알바 시작함. 저는 게이 바에서 일했던 이성애자입니다 ama. 솔직히 됬던거 인정 팁을떠나 기본 룸티가 보장이되서 영업제한이기도 햇지만 2달동한 한 12501300나왔던걸로 기억. 유머 친구들이랑 호기심에 게이바 갔던 썰ssul 27 쿠드랴프카 3394633 모험가 추천흡수기 유게이 고양이 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 3312일 lv.

난 나잉 논란 개드립 도자기 내가 대학 수시를 붙고 도대체 뭘할지. 개드립 도자기 자꾸만 썰3를 쓰자쓰자 생각만하고. Ex 상남자스탈이거나 내가 계집처럼생겨서 뽑혓다거나 뭐. 알바몬 알바 5개 지원햇는데이것도 경쟁력 빡세면 어쩌냐 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ힘 많이안쓰는거는없겠지. 11 143629 ip ip보기클릭 스크랩. 남궁혁 실물 후기

노무현 북딱 뜻 Danielas short video with ♬ sonido original. 게이 야 나 얼마전에 이태원 바 bar에서 알바 시작함 김대리 오 나 이태원 살잖아 게이 ㅇㅇ. 男 娼 ｜ male prostitute, gigolo 다만 지골로의 경우 기둥서방 을 뜻하기도 하므로 해석. Com › free › 303350204단기간 돈 빡세게 버는 알바 뭐잇냐 자유게시판 코인판. Com › df3714 › 70185949203스압 게이바에서 일한 나의 ssul 3 게이바 알바 네이버 블로그. 네즈 코 일러스트

노은솔 바프 디씨에서 읽어보던 바텀알바 썰 이런게 그래서 바텀알바 인터넷으로 어떻게하는지 돈은 얼마나받는지 존나 검색해보고 생각해보니 도저히 똥꾸멍대주는건 못하겠더라 그냥 오ㄹ정도만 하려고했다. 해방촌술집 남산술집 레빗홀은 자유분방한 분위기의 인테리어에 사진을 어떻게 찍어도 스타일리쉬 하게 나오고 예쁘더라고요. 게이바 전용 개진상 우리 사장아가 돈이좀 많아서 처음에 차릴때부터 무려 2층에다가 지하에 주차장까지 마련한 곳을 차렸더라고 그래서 우리 바에는 주차장이 있는데 아마 그때가 새벽 3시 반쯤에 내가 쓰레기 버릴겸 담배한대 빨러. 여기는 게이바지만 다른 호빠하고 크게 다르지는 않다고 했다. فيديو tiktok تيك توك من hewavat @hewavat كريكت كريكت_ميكر ترند تيك_توك_جدة تيكتوك_عرب لايك. 남자 둘레 13cm 디시

노들길 살인사건 친구 디시 Comosqb6vgbe 후원하기 stoon. 우선 글쓰기에 앞서 나는 20대 초중반 신체건장한 이성애자 임을 밝힙니다. 스압 게이바에서 일한 나의 ssul 4 게이바 알바. 나 남자고 술집 알바구하던중 시급이 엄청 높은 있어서 가봤는데 게이바여서 그냥 나왔던 적이 있거든. ㅎㅎ 친구 얘기로는 앞에 무지개 깃발 같은게 있었는데 그게 게이바 라는 의미라고 하더라고요.

냄새 히토미 Watch the latest video from idetaman @pribadi. 유머 시급 4만원짜리 알바 유유게게이이 47 26. 내가 대학 수시를 붙고 도대체 뭘할지 모르고 고민할때 내가 하고싶은. Com › df3714 › 70185947732스압 게이바에서 일한 나의 ssul 게이바 알바 네이버 블로그. Net44770439 1번썰이 궁굼한 사람은 ㄱㄱ 직접 알바한 경험을 토대로 작성했음을 알려드립니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.