프시네 아틀리에 채널은 주로 게임과 관련된 콘텐츠를 다루는 온라인 커뮤니티입니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이틀전에 발매된 아자라시&각설탕의 콜라보 게임게임에 대한 자세한 정보는 덧글시놉시스클릭. 진행중인 한패 관련 소식메이킹 러버즈 1차 번역이 완료되었습니다. 이틀전에 발매된 아자라시&각설탕의 콜라보 게임게임에 대한 자세한 정보는 덧글시놉시스클릭. 번호 제목 작성자 작성일 조회수 추천 패트리온 개설했습니다 24.

이웃집 러브 쥬스 기대하는 사람이 꽤 많을 아틀리에 카구야.

Com › Mgallery › Board아틀리에 정보 사이트 정리 아틀리에 시리즈 마이너 갤러리.

각종 동영상 올라오는 곳 아틀리에 온라인 유튜브 공식채널 S.

예전에 미번게임 업데이트 하고 시간이 좀 지났는데, 복구요청이 생각보다 많이 들와서 새로 다시 올립니다.. Comgustatelierpr 공식 정보 소통창구..

Comgustatelierpr 공식 정보 소통창구, 뉴스 프시네 아틀리에 채널 알림알림 중알림 취소구독구독 중구독 취소 구독자 10539명알림수신 568명 @프시 게임 번역 역식자 작업 공방 선행공개 gpt4o교룡의 무녀 2409302200 글자 잘리던 버그 수정2 프시. 진행중인 한패 관련 소식메이킹 러버즈 1차 번역이 완료되었습니다. 지난주에 발매된 비숍 신작게임에 대한 자세한 정보는 덧글시놉시스클릭. 각종 동영상 올라오는 곳 아틀리에 온라인 유튜브 공식채널 s. 공지 아카라이브 모바일 앱 이용 안내iosandroid.

낼부터 벌써 신작이 내일임지난달에 유독 신작이 적어서 이번에 몰아치는 기분인데, 양이 좀 되니까 정리겸 올려봄물론 번역 예정인 게임 위주로 올림1. 내가 좋아하는 사람이 좋아하는 사람은 여장한 나 였습니다 2, 흥미로울만한 소식이 이것저것 있어서 적어봅니다.

렛츠 다오 슈가스타일 연인이상 부부미만 애프터 스토리 3. 오늘 드디어 메이킹 러버즈 1차 전체 번역본을 받아서 합쳐드린다음, 검수파트로 넘어 갔습니다이걸 번. 공지 아틀리에 채널에 오신 것을 환영합니다. 뉴스 프시네 아틀리에 채널 알림알림 중알림 취소subscribesubscribedunsubscribe 10582 subscribers알림수신 569명 @프시 게임 번역 역식자 작업 공방 선행공개 gpt4o시작하는 세계의 이상론 goodbye world index 2409101900 수정 프시. 자료 만료일 경우 덧글로 요청해주세요 처음오시면 채널 규칙은 필독입니다. 린디 근황

린유 스타킹 8201 공지 패트리온 개설했습니다 프시 2022. 2017년 6월 7일 코에이 테크모 유튜브 채널에서 생중계한 아틀리에 시리즈 20주년 기념 발표회에서, 신비의 연금술사 시리즈 3부작 리디 & 수르의 아틀리에, iosandroid 모바일게임인 아틀리에 온라인의 일부 정보가 선공개되었다. Ahr0chm6ly9raw9zay5hyy9jlzaxmm8xdjnxmukyrdiwmneyrjfmmg4wuzj0mzgxrdbq 이 작품은 기간 제한이 없습니다. 처음오시면 채널 규칙은 반드시 읽어 주세요. 여기에만 올라오는 자료는 명절이나 기념일 등등의 특별한 날 외에는 따로 복구하지 않으니, 터지기 전에 미리미리 챙겨두세요. 리코 남친 디시

리쿠 사주 디시 아이카기2 특정씬 미번역 부분 수정 11131210 3. 프시네 아틀리에 채널은 주로 게임과 관련된 콘텐츠를 다루는 온라인 커뮤니티입니다. 지난달에 발매된 유니슨 시프트의 신작게임에 대한 자세한 정보는 덧글시놉시스클릭. 예전에 미번게임 업데이트 하고 시간이 좀 지났는데, 복구요청이 생각보다 많이 들와서 새로 다시 올립니다. 드디어 한해도 마지막날이 되었군요어제 밖에 돌아다니다가 허리를 뽀각. 류시호 asmr

린지 리 영상 Comchannelucmdhfigkb_tugnvhza2oq0g 아온만 올라오는 곳인데 업뎃을 안 해 아틀리에 공식 트위터 smobile. 혀꼬임이 굉장히 심한게임인데다가, 특유의 갸루 말투, 거기다 번역검수도 거의 안하고 밤새서 퀄이. 2021년 즈음에 번역 입문해서 처음엔 아무것도 모르고 내가 좋아하는 게임을 번역 해보자 하고 시작했다가,어설픈 억지 번역론 펼치다 두드려 맞기도 하고,고생해서 번역한 게임이 많은 분들에게 사랑 받아서 기쁘기도 했고. 이 바닥 최고의 제작사라 불리는 유즈 소프트의 간판작게임에 대한 자세한 정보는 덧글시놉시스클릭. 오토메 세계를 걷는 법기대하는 사람이 어마어마하게 많다못해, 페미세계라는 설정 때문에 이미 여러.

로렌 필립스 한 관계로 오늘은 번역보다 한해 결산글이나 한번 써볼까 싶네요빨리 나아야 할텐데 말이죠많은 분들이 궁금해 할법한 것들, 개인적인 통계 같은. 패트리온 문의 히고싶어서그러는데 어케 해야 하나요 프시 20250131 014412 채널공지글에 있는 디코아이디 복호화해서 친추해주세요 그랑존 20250209 011831. 진행중인 한패 관련 소식메이킹 러버즈 1차 번역이 완료되었습니다. 다음은 프시네 아틀리에 채널에 대한 주요 정보입니다 1. 뭐 언젠가 될 때까지 기다리는 것도 있겠지만 그동안 신세진것도 있고, 큰 돈도 아니길래 구독함ㄳㄳ.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.