Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

함께해 주신 모든 분들, 그리고 사랑해 주신 시청자 여러분께 진심으로 감사. 220611 우주소녀 보나 기적같은아이 직캠 wjsn bona fancam 180428 우주소녀 꿈꾸는 마음으로 보나 직캠 영월. Treasure 트레저 2ndfullalbum more. 이건 저희가 또 의미를 만든거예요 ㅎ.

루루카 얼굴 디시

15k followers, 61 following, 3,230 posts bona 우주소녀 보나 펜페즈💫 @bona, Wjsn, boogie up bona focus the show 190611. Kim ji yun, known professionally as bo na, is a south korean singer, dancer, actress and member of wjsn 우주소녀, also known.

렐라 갤러리

보나, 태어나다 제왕절개 후기 블로그, Yoo bona, korean actress, 유보나, Hánviệt kim tri nghiên, sinh ngày 19 tháng 8 năm 1995, thường được biết đến với nghệ danh bona 보나, là một nữ ca sĩ, diễn viên người hàn quốc, thành viên nhóm nhạc cosmic girls. 뽀야라는 별명이 생기기 전 보나의 최애 별명이다, Born aug, better known by her stage name bona korean 보나, is a south korean singer and actress, Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the.

육아휴직을 마치고 회사로 돌아간 5년차 유부녀 유보나. Find the latest filmography, dramas, movies, news, pictures, videos with yoo bona. 보나는 저격총을 진 채 호텔에 있는 타깃을 향해 총구를 겨눈다. Kang tae oh sits for an interview for moon river, Yoo bona, korean actress, filmography, 유보나.

苞娜 金知妍보나 bona 檔案,包含電視劇,電影,動畫演出資料,相關新聞,討論,連結,分享,得獎記錄,也歡迎大家留言, 苞娜 （韓語： 보나， 羅馬化：bo na，英語： bona，1995年8月19日—），本名 金知妍1 （韓語： 김지연， 羅馬化：kim ji yeon，英語： kim ji yeon）， 韓國 女歌手 、 女演員。, Bona you 국립 창원대학교 새내기 필수 시청. Born aug, better known by her stage name bona korean 보나, is a south korean singer and actress.

팬들이 프라이빗 메시지에서 뽀야라고 부르자 스스로를 뽀야라고 지칭하여 사용하기 시작했다. Hánviệt kim tri nghiên, sinh ngày 19 tháng 8 năm 1995, thường được biết đến với nghệ danh bona 보나, là một nữ ca sĩ, diễn viên người hàn quốc, thành viên nhóm nhạc cosmic girls. 2,881 followers, 500 following, 682 posts 유보나 @hedys_daily on instagram ns홈쇼핑 쇼핑호스트. 苞娜 金知妍보나 bona 檔案,包含電視劇,電影,動畫演出資料,相關新聞,討論,連結,分享,得獎記錄,也歡迎大家留言.

Org › person › 4211534yoobonayoo bona — the movie database tmdb.. Wjsn on j 220714 bona twitter update on @wjsn_cosmic official twitter.. Yoo bona, korean actress, filmography, 유보나..

류진 허벅지 디시

15k followers, 61 following, 3,230 posts bona 우주소녀 보나 펜페즈💫 @bona, Treasure 트레저 2ndfullalbum more, 42,647 likes 2 talking about this. 15k followers, 61 following, 3,230 posts bona 우주소녀 보나 펜페즈💫 @bona. She is the lead dancer, subvocalist, subrapper and visual of the south korean girl group wjsn and is a member of its wonder unit. 681 likes, 1 comments bona.

👂 귀의 기준을 만드는 보나성형외과 bona clinic is only for ear surgery, 人気投票受付中！名前보나 bona・年齢30歳・人気投票数累計50470票・インスタグラムあり・主演ドラマ「鬼宮」「ピラミッドゲーム」・出演ドラマ「ラジオロマンス」「最高の一発～時. Fresh 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상.

루루카 반캠 Days ago if you would like to receive treatment or consultation, make an appointment over the phone in advance for faster treatment procedures. 208k views 2 years ago. 15k followers, 680 following, 60 posts 보나 @bona_manaa on instagram b5nakim@gmail. 복귀 후 첫 미팅은 암살업무, 보나는. Fresh 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상. 류겜 바이러스

린유 애널 Wjsn, boogie up bona focus the show 190611. Wjsn visual & lead dancer bona 우주소녀 보나. Kim ji yun, known professionally as bo na, is a south korean singer, dancer, actress and member of wjsn 우주소녀, also known. 15k followers, 61 following, 3,230 posts bona 우주소녀 보나 펜페즈💫 @bona. 정확한 과거는 밝혀지지 않았으나 성장과정이 평탄하지 않았으며, 때문에 평범한 삶에 대한. 류시호 전생

린지 리 영어로 정확한 과거는 밝혀지지 않았으나 성장과정이 평탄하지 않았으며, 때문에 평범한 삶에 대한. Bona는 라틴어로 축복이라는 뜻이랍니다. 42,647 likes 2 talking about this. 1 she is also part of their subunit wjsn the black. Lévy gorvy announces appointment of bona yoo as sales director in new york dominique lévy and brett gorvy are delighted to welcome bona yoo to lévy gorvy in new york, where she will join as a director on the sales team, starting novem. 리유니갤

리커창 사망 디시 보나는 저격총을 진 채 호텔에 있는 타깃을 향해 총구를 겨눈다. Org › wiki › 苞娜苞娜 维基百科，自由的百科全书. Com › playlistbona 보나 music playlist youtube. Films starring yoo bona yoo bona 유보나, born 1997 is a south korean adult film actress. Yook sung jae, bona, and kim ji hoons the haunted palace premieres with staggering ratings bona suffers attacks from supernatural forces in the haunted palace.

루자미네 섹스 Org › person › 4211534yoobonayoo bona — the movie database tmdb. Kim jiyeon hangul 김지연, better known as bona 보나, was born on aug age 30 in daegu, south korea. 김도훈배우희보나, 남녀신인상 수상 2022 코리아드라마어워즈 kim dohoon, bae woohee, bona wins best new male and female rookie of the year award 2022 korea drama awards in korean. 예능연구소 직캠 wjsn la la love bona, 우주소녀 la. Treasure bona bona track video.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.