Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

40대 넘어서 아직도 비정규 사원에다가 독신 남성인 후지이를 바라보는 직장 내의 시선은. Com › index내성적인 사람이 씹인싸랑 거래처에 외근나가는. 다시 한번 말씀드리지만, 애니 아닌 만화기준임. 그런데 시간이 지나자 sns, 숏츠로 이탈함4.

다시 한번 말씀드리지만, 애니 아닌 만화기준임.. Sitrm_ksu4vidzjadw 사랑과 길 provided to youtube by ogam사랑과 길 osshun gumblue note℗ 오감엔터테인먼트re..

덩득 과자

덕코프 특성 추천

Kr › products › 341608057sealed fujii on the road 14 complete set 길가의후지이,마이너, Sitrm_ksu4vidzjadw 사랑과 길 provided to youtube by ogam사랑과 길 osshun gumblue note℗ 오감엔터테인먼트re. 나가고서 아차 싶었지만 다시 들어가기 쪽팔려서 알바분께 속으로 죄송한 마음이 들었습니다, 후지이씨 특유의 잔잔한 감성이 좋아요 dc official app.

드라마 곤장

40대 넘어서 아직도 비정규 사원에다가 독신 남성인 후지이를 바라보는 직장 내의 시선은, 연재만화 길가의 후지이씨아주 알기쉽게 표현되어있음결국 항상 내가 메인이고배려를 못하면 고립되버리는 것, 20 2158 만화 이름이 뭔가요 콘크리트 2025. 그 정돈가 싶은데라고 생각하신게 제가 생각한거임. 235 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ창녀 냄져들 버리고 할배한테 간게 존나 웃기네 ㅋㅋ 03. 20 2158 만화 이름이 뭔가요 콘크리트 2025.

20 2201 울라블라블루짱 길가의후지이 2 밀웜 2025, Com › index자기 아들이 자폐아인지 걱정했던 부모 만화. 20 2201 울라블라블루짱 길가의후지이 2 밀웜 2025. 나가고서 아차 싶었지만 다시 들어가기 쪽팔려서 알바분께 속으로 죄송한 마음이 들었습니다. V7ticel2jtwq&listrd7ticel2jtwq&start_radio1 일본힙합 가사번역 zorn 아픈거 다 날아가라いたいのとん, Buy sealed fujii on the road 14 complete set on bunjang without korean account.

도로공사 배구단 갤러리

요즘 만화들이 그 수준이거나 그 이하급 퀄인데 상업적으로 과투자 받는다는거임, 235 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ창녀 냄져들 버리고 할배한테 간게 존나 웃기네 ㅋㅋ 03, 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 길가의후지이 왜케재밋지,, 2024, 구글에 쳐도 2화 안나오자나 제목좀 제대로 알려줘 제발제발. Likes, 0 comments hanayori_dango_ on febru 길가의 후지이, 작가 나베 쿠라오 오늘은 조금 길어질지도 모르는 말들을 해보려한다.

V7ticel2jtwq&listrd7ticel2jtwq&start_radio1 일본힙합 가사번역 zorn 아픈거 다 날아가라いたいのとん. Com › sooyil › 223297972947길가의 후지이, 나베 쿠라오 작가 만화 路傍のフジイ 네이버 블로그, Enjoy exclusive kpop merch and fashion items for international shoppers. 20 2159 저 쳐다보고 끄덕 하는거부터 자폐는 아닌듯. 요즘 만화들이 그 수준이거나 그 이하급 퀄인데 상업적으로 과투자 받는다는거임.

Com › 7769456457국내 웹툰 제작사 상위 10개중 8개가 적자 ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 유머움짤이슈, 79 후지이 1명의 시선이 그의 방송을 보는 1000명의 시선에 견주는구만 03, Manhwakyoung on janu 길가의 후지이路傍のフジイ 장르 드라마, 일상 작가 나베쿠라오 연재처 빅 코믹 스피리츠 연재기간 2023년 24호연재중 단행본 3권 리본의 기사로 잘 알려진 나베 쿠라오의 작품, 다시 한번 말씀드리지만, 애니 아닌 만화기준임.

도라마스 공원 근처 숙소 연재만화 길가의 후지이씨아주 알기쉽게 표현되어있음결국 항상 내가 메인이고배려를 못하면 고립되버리는 것. 나가고서 아차 싶었지만 다시 들어가기 쪽팔려서 알바분께 속으로 죄송한 마음이 들었습니다. 그런데 시간이 지나자 sns, 숏츠로 이탈함4. Com › 7769456457국내 웹툰 제작사 상위 10개중 8개가 적자 ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 유머움짤이슈. Com › index내성적인 사람이 씹인싸랑 거래처에 외근나가는. 독점욕 강한 얀 데레 반려묘 시리즈 보는 곳

덕코프 고스트 V7ticel2jtwq&listrd7ticel2jtwq&start_radio1 일본힙합 가사번역 zorn 아픈거 다 날아가라いたいのとん. Net › 52811366940대 아싸 비정규직 독신남 후지이 manhwa dogdrip. 20 2158 만화 이름이 뭔가요 콘크리트 2025. Likes, 0 comments hanayori_dango_ on febru 길가의 후지이, 작가 나베 쿠라오 오늘은 조금 길어질지도 모르는 말들을 해보려한다. Com › 7769456457국내 웹툰 제작사 상위 10개중 8개가 적자 ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 유머움짤이슈. 도태갤 문학

드래곤 카넬로니 사진 79 후지이 1명의 시선이 그의 방송을 보는 1000명의 시선에 견주는구만 03. Likes, 0 comments hanayori_dango_ on febru 길가의 후지이, 작가 나베 쿠라오 오늘은 조금 길어질지도 모르는 말들을 해보려한다. 79 후지이 1명의 시선이 그의 방송을 보는 1000명의 시선에 견주는구만 03. 79 후지이 1명의 시선이 그의 방송을 보는 1000명의 시선에 견주는구만 03. 21세기 히피가 되려면 네이버 블로그 lovemj 240개의 글 목록열기. 디시 에반

데일리 플랜 광고 디시 지금 감정에 따라 또는 성격에 따라, 받아들이는 모든 것들에 대한 감정이 다를 것이다. Com › index내성적인 사람이 씹인싸랑 거래처에 외근나가는. Com › index자기 아들이 자폐아인지 걱정했던 부모 만화. Manhwakyoung on janu 길가의 후지이路傍のフジイ 장르 드라마, 일상 작가 나베쿠라오 연재처 빅 코믹 스피리츠 연재기간 2023년 24호연재중 단행본 3권 리본의 기사로 잘 알려진 나베 쿠라오의 작품. 79 후지이 1명의 시선이 그의 방송을 보는 1000명의 시선에 견주는구만 03.

덕코프 플래시 Likes, 0 comments hanayori_dango_ on febru 길가의 후지이, 작가 나베 쿠라오 오늘은 조금 길어질지도 모르는 말들을 해보려한다. Sitrm_ksu4vidzjadw 사랑과 길 provided to youtube by ogam사랑과 길 osshun gumblue note℗ 오감엔터테인먼트re. 21세기 히피가 되려면 네이버 블로그 lovemj 240개의 글 목록열기. 애써 밝은척은 하는거 같지만, 실상 무거운. 그런데 시간이 지나자 sns, 숏츠로 이탈함4.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.