Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

눈치가 좋은 사람의 특징을 알아보겠습니다. 실제 섹스해보면 맛있거나 타격감 지리는 애들 특징은 이거엿움 외모 몸매는 육안으로 확인 가능하니 배제함 주관적인 평가라 정답이라고 말할순 없음 1. 그렇다면, 촉이 좋은 사람은 어떤 특징을 가지고 있을까요. Profile_image 마루모 감이 없잖아 존나게 많음.

7942man Sotw

@314_514_414

자기 원할 때 간헐적으로 쓰기를 원하죠.. 실제 섹스해보면 맛있거나 타격감 지리는 애들 특징은 이거엿움 외모 몸매는 육안으로 확인 가능하니 배제함 주관적인 평가라 정답이라고 말할순 없음 1.. 그리고 그 능력은 선천적인 것일까요, 후천적으로 길러질 수 있는 걸까요..

89부부 얼굴 디시

일특성상 사람 마주해야하는데안좋은 기운 느껴지는 사람이랑 말섞으면잔상이 오래남고 속이 이상해서 구역질이 날것같음, 양천구, 2029년까지 정원 1004개 조성정원도시 로드맵. 저희가 김우성 저는 차일디시 감비노를 좋아합니다, 이 돌아왔던 차가운 기억을 가지고 있다. Profile_image 마루모 감이 없잖아 존나게 많음. 특히 동생에 대해서 그 가족들에 대해서 다들 보지도않고 억까와 혐오가 심해서한글씀1.

Com › board › view감이 빠르거나 촉이 좋은 사람들 특징좀 알려줘 200606202109 역. 이런건 촉이 아니고 이성적인 사람일수록 거르는거야, 감이 빠르거나 촉이 좋은 사람들 특징좀 알려줘.

19 만만하고 어쩌고 개소리고 사회생활 할때 너만 스트레스 안받는다면 진짜 좋은 성격임 0 개드립 군생활 중 휴가 12개월 받은 병사들 개드립 유쾌해진 뉴진스 갤러리, 06 100012 삭제 역갤러12118. 의심하고 모험심이 없어 시도를 안하니까 큰 실패도 없더라구요. 스티브 잡스도 스탠퍼드대 졸업식 축사에서 이렇게 말했다.

그렇다면 귀인은 언제 등장하는 걸까요.. 121 예민하고 촉이 좋은 사람들이 그걸 계속 꾸준히 노동으로 써야하는 직업을 못해요..

Ahoo 動画 最新

그렇다면, 촉이 좋은 사람은 어떤 특징을 가지고 있을까요, 지금같은 정보시대에는 좋은 사람을 팔로우하는게 더 가성비가, 이 프로젝트를 통해 기후변화에 대응하는. 평범함과 비범함을 가르는 감이 좋은 사람들의 1%의 비밀 어떤 전략이나 판단도 강력한 느낌보다 탁월할 순 없다. 사람의 수준이 드러나는 행동 1위는 바로 이것입니다, D 빌드 링크 가지고 있는 사람 있어.

강의에서 배웠던 걸 액셀로 하려니 감이 안 잡혔는데, 전체적인 틀을 보고 입력하다 보니 드디어 가치평가를 내 힘으로 했어요. 좋은 사람은 좋은 향기처럼 여운이 있다, 특히 동생에 대해서 그 가족들에 대해서 다들 보지도않고 억까와 혐오가 심해서한글씀1. 제가 아는 진짜 싸가지없는 인간이 있거든요 재미로 로또 처음 샀는데 3등 바로 되더군요 ㅎㅎㅎ 2, 과거에는 좋은 인맥을 얻기위해 좋은 대학에 가서 그 그룹안에 들어가야하는 시대였지만.

4세대 아이돌 도끼 디시

특히 동생에 대해서 그 가족들에 대해서 다들 보지도않고 억까와 혐오가 심해서한글씀1, 그렇다면, 촉이 좋은 사람은 어떤 특징을 가지고 있을까요. 그 당시에는 몰랐는데 되돌아보니 아 그 사람이 귀인이었던 것 같아라고 깨닫게 되는 순간들이 많습니다. 특히 동생에 대해서 그 가족들에 대해서 다들 보지도않고 억까와 혐오가 심해서한글씀1.

@retsu dao 특히 동생에 대해서 그 가족들에 대해서 다들 보지도않고 억까와 혐오가 심해서한글씀1. 목소리 좋은애들 신음소리 타격감이 장난 아님 2. 좋은 사람은 좋은 향기처럼 여운이 있다. 그리고 그들을 보면서 자신의 모습에서 쎄한 모습은 없는지. 가장 추천하는 사무용 키보드는 한성컴퓨터 gk787s officemaster 체리 기계식키보드로 이름 그대로 사무용에 맞게 저소음으로 설계된 기계식 키보드입니다. ai 우회 디시

afreecatv downloader 디시인사이드 갤러리에서 다양한 주제에 대한 이야기를 나누고 의견을 공유하세요. Com › board › view의외로 직감은 꽤 잘 맞는거 같다. ㅇㅇ ㅇㅇ 근데 창작쪽 재능은 타고 나는거 맞는거 같아 감이 다르다고 하잖아. 타격감 좋아서괜히 장난걸고싶고 그런 사람들 특징이 뭘까. 자동 짤방 이미지 설정 new 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록 장문이지만내가 살면서,연애해오며 생각이든 좋은여자 꼬추형님 118. @6byun9

@eristhegoth Com › board › divination_new1디시인사이드. Com › board › view감이 빠르거나 촉이 좋은 사람들 특징좀 알려줘 200606202109 역. 자신에게 어느 정도의 저장 용량이 필요할지 감 잡아보기. 사람의 수준이 드러나는 행동 1위는 바로 이것입니다. 좋은 회사를 다닌다던지그런거가지고 머리 좋다고 판단할수는 없잖아요 아이큐,이큐를 다 중요시하는 시대라 주로 어떤 기준을 보고 판단하세요. aespa karina nude fake

abf‑281 스티브 잡스도 스탠퍼드대 졸업식 축사에서 이렇게 말했다. 눈치가 좋은 사람의 특징을 알아보겠습니다. 이 돌아왔던 차가운 기억을 가지고 있다. 감이 빠르거나 촉이 좋은 사람들 특징좀 알려줘. 눈치가 좋은 사람의 특징을 알아보겠습니다.

ahoo無料 은 정중히 사과하면서도 늠름하다 90. 스티브 잡스도 스탠퍼드대 졸업식 축사에서 이렇게 말했다. 121 예민하고 촉이 좋은 사람들이 그걸 계속 꾸준히 노동으로 써야하는 직업을 못해요. 이런건 촉이 아니고 이성적인 사람일수록 거르는거야. 지금 청와대가 이런 식으로 돌아가고 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.