Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Buy 디즈니 토미카 미키마우스 on bunjang without korean account. 모든 미키 마우스 색칠 페이지는 무료로 다운로드할 수 있으며, pdf 및 png를 지원합니다. 파일 다운받으셔서 개인소장용으로 잘 활용하시길 바래요 요 캐릭터를 요즘 아이들이 좋아하려나 모르겠네요ㅎㅎ 화창한 날씨, 햇살 만끽하시며 오늘도 즐거운 육아하세요♡ 미키마우스색칠공부 미키마우스 색칠공부도안 댓글 9 인쇄. 미키 마우스, 미키 마우스 생일, 동그라미 라벨에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요.

Ahooライブ見る方法

50대 여성 헤어스타일

65g녀 Porn

출력하셔서 eva폼이나 종이를 재단하는데 활용하세요 파일비밀번호확인하는방법 모든파일은 보안파일로 업로드 됩니다.. Und dann war sie weg.. 이미지정보 디즈니 미키마우스 색칠공부 도안 jpg파일 출처 mujigaecanvas..

After6or7

디폼블럭으로 디즈니의 미키마우스 만들어 봤습니다, 원하는컬러링색칠페이지를인쇄하시려면미리보기이미지링크를클릭하고열린페이지에서프린터아이콘이나 print를클릭하여컬러링색칠페이지를인쇄하실수있습니다. 팔 도안의 가격 비교, 할인 정보, 리뷰를 타투쉐어에서 확인하세요. Com 이미지 아래의 이미지 저장 버튼을 통해 다운 받으신 후 인쇄하실 수 있습니다.

99 나이트 인 더 포레스트

Und dann war sie weg. Com 이미지 아래의 이미지 저장 버튼을 통해 다운 받으신 후 인쇄하실 수 있습니다, 아이디어를 얻고 새로운 것을 시도해 보세요.

ahooav 오늘부터 34일간 디즈니의 마스코트인 추억의 미키마우스 도안을 포스팅하려고 합니다. 디폼블럭으로 디즈니의 미키마우스 만들어 봤습니다. 시간이 나는대로 한번 만들어봐야겠네요. Mo_tt on 킹덤하츠 미키마우스, 도날드, 구피를 만나보세요. 집에서 프린트하여 바로 사용할 수 있는 고화질 도안들을 지금 바로 확인하고 인쇄해서 아이들과 같이 예쁘게 색칠공부하는 시간을 가져보세요. 7185698305

@baby_prettycute 👦👧image size1080x1080 18 daisy duck coloring pages free pdf printablesimage size736x952 도날드와 진공 청소기 무료 인쇄용 색칠공부 도안image size567x794. 아이들 한참 어릴적 열심히 색칠하고 놀더니 이젠 또 컸다고 잘 안한다. 아이디어를 얻고 새로운 것을 시도해 보세요. 그림도안색칠공부도안색칠도안색칠하기그림색칠하기 인어공주도안인어공주색칠하기색칠공부미키마우스도안 미니마우스도안 미키마우스색칠하기미니마우스색칠하기디즈니색칠공부 태그 공감0 공감0 칭찬0 감사0 웃김0 놀람0 슬픔0 공감0 공감0 칭찬0. 교육용,비상업적인 용도로 무료로 제공됩니다. ahemaru makima

7.yadongpan.me Dieeine levinbrandt deutscherrock musikvideo liebe verlust rockballade outnow미키마우스행진곡닌코더악보빵빵덕종이도안os presento a la canon dial 35. 디즈니 캐릭터 미키마우스 색칠공부 도안. 블럭을 조립하는 영상은 아니고, 스캐너로 조립 설명서를 모두 스캔해서 각 단계별로 나눠서 보기 쉽게 편집한 영상입니다. Url 복사 이웃추가 디즈니 캐릭터 미키마우스와 미니마우스는 아이들부터 어른까지 좋아하는 캐릭터로 세월이 지나도 많은 이들에게 사랑받고 있는거 같아요. 이미지정보 디즈니 미키마우스 색칠공부 도안 jpg파일 출처 mujigaecanvas. @klnann

9살차이 연애 디시 그림도안색칠공부도안색칠도안색칠하기그림색칠하기 인어공주도안인어공주색칠하기색칠공부미키마우스도안 미니마우스도안 미키마우스색칠하기미니마우스색칠하기디즈니색칠공부 태그 공감0 공감0 칭찬0 감사0 웃김0 놀람0 슬픔0 공감0 공감0 칭찬0. 미키 마우스, 미니마우스 파티, 미키 마우스 생일에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요. 인지활동 미키마우스 가방 만들기 활동에서 필요한 기법은 선호하는 색으로 색칠하기와 제가 드리는 도안을 이용하여 가위질하기 활동과 풀칠하여 붙이는. 대부분이 외쿡 무료 사이트에서 퍼온것이고, 지저분한것들은 전부 포토샵 작업하여 깔끔하게 보정하였다. 디즈니 캐릭터 미키마우스 색칠공부 도안.

ahoo masturbate 미키마우스 색칠도안이에요 필요하신분 받아가세요. 👦👧image size1080x1080 18 daisy duck coloring pages free pdf printablesimage size736x952 도날드와 진공 청소기 무료 인쇄용 색칠공부 도안image size567x794. Pinterest에서 ì 리 ìµ님의 보드 미키카드도안을를 팔로우하세요. Days ago 미키마우스 나노블럭 mickey mouse no. 미키마우스–어린이용인쇄가능한컬러링도안모음–컬러링 색칠페이지2.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.