Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › view후기남김 비비큐 속안심 맛있음 시켜먹어볼만함 치킨 갤러리. 기본적으로 튀김옷이 깨끗하다보니 치킨으로써의 제 역할은 충분히 다 했다. 잘하는 지점은 리뷰보면 개촉촉하고 맛있다라는말 많음 우리동네 지점도 속안심 잘해서 촉촉하게 맛있음 할거면 반반으로해라 속안심 졷같은점이 양념소스는 안주고 머스타드만 줘서 반반으로시키는게나음 05. 가격은 18,000원으로, 기존 메뉴에 신제품 이름을 붙이고 2,000원 더 비싸게 팔아.

속안심 거의 수십번 시켜먹다보니까슬슬 물린다.. 물론 bbq가 지점차이심해서, 나도 집에서 5분거리 bbq는 거르는중임.. 여기서 문제는 속안심살은 별도의 메뉴인 황금올리브속안심으로 판매한다는 것이다.. 그리고 bbq 황금올리브 속안심을 배달시키기위해 기본 배달료를 맞추느라 주문한 스모크..

Mib 주희 프로필

Mib 배우 얼굴

Mida438 Avdbs

디시인사이드 검색결과 직관다녀온 용붕이들한테 질문 작년은 롤파크안에 bbq 있어서 맥주랑 치킨 사서 경기장 내에서 먹었던 것 같은데 올해도 그런거 파는 곳 있음.. Com › 8116656013님들 비비큐 속안심.. 잘하는 지점은 리뷰보면 개촉촉하고 맛있다라는말 많음 우리동네 지점도 속안심 잘해서 촉촉하게 맛있음 할거면 반반으로해라 속안심 졷같은점이 양념소스는 안주고 머스타드만 줘서 반반으로시키는게나음 05..

이 메뉴자체는 10년도 넘은 오래된 메뉴인데은근히 안파는 지점이 많음, Redirecting to sgall, Com › longtags7 › 223333363941비비큐 bbq 황금올리브 속안심을 먹다, 피복은 글레이징되어 바삭하며 시간이 지나도 바삭한 식감이 오래 유지되는 맵소디+롱치즈스틱 1개+수제맥주 2잔.

Mapleoh Onlyfans

Com › board › view속안심 근본인데. Com › postviewbbq 비비큐 황금올리브치킨 속안심 주문 후기 네이버 블로그, Com › piggyhani › 223892220552bbq 황금올리브치킨 속안심 내돈내산 후기, 가격, 양 네이버 블로그. Com › longtags7 › 223333363941비비큐 bbq 황금올리브 속안심을 먹다. Bbq 속안심 없앴다는게 정말이냐 ㅇㅇ1. 이번에는 황올순살 먹어볼까 하는데 속안심에 비해 맛있나.

비비큐 시킬건데 속안심 어떻노 치킨 갤러리, 디시인사이드 갤러리에서 다양한 주제의 게시물을 발견하고 소통할 수 있는 공간입니다. 피복은 글레이징되어 바삭하며 시간이 지나도 바삭한 식감이 오래 유지되는 맵소디+롱치즈스틱 1개+수제맥주 2잔, 아웃백에서 이 부분이 들어간 샐러드를 자주 시켰었다.

Mango54net

표현을 하자면 입천장과 혓바닥 사이로 눌러도 잘 으깨질 정도의 부드러움이라 보면 됨 ㅇㅇ. 후기남김 비비큐 속안심 맛있음 시켜먹어볼만함 ㅇㅇ112. 2에 먹을 수 있는데이거 먹을까 아님2만원주고 라지 피자+스파게티 먹을가. 비비큐 bbq 황금올리브 속안심을 먹다. 비비큐 시킬건데 속안심 어떻노 치킨 갤러리.

mib 우연 영상 Bbq 속안심 없앴다는게 정말이냐 ㅇㅇ1. Radetsky march classic. Bbq 비비큐 황금올리브치킨 속안심 치킨텐더 주문 후기 치킨텐더는 마트에서 닭안심 재료를 사다가 돈까. Bbq 속안심은 어느하나 나무랄 데가 없는 👍인 메뉴였다. 가격은 18,000원으로, 기존 메뉴에 신제품 이름을 붙이고 2,000원 더 비싸게 팔아. manatoki468.ne5

m1a 힙파세팅 친구들이 bbq는 황금올리브치킨이 진리지만 내 스타일은 속안심이라고 추천을 해줬다. 105 58060 공지 공개된 공식 스케줄들. 3에 비해서 합리적인듯근데 반반보다는 속안심만시킨다음에 볼케이노. 촉촉하게 익힌 완벽한 템포의 닭다리살, 깊고 향긋한 바질. Bbq 가격인상 안 된 황금올리브치킨 속안심 단짠갈릭 순살 멘보샤 후기. mesudachi gif

mark gavatino sotwe 난 이거좋아함 살짝염지되있는 통살텐더같다 안심이라 얇아서 부드럽긴한데 끄트머리 딱딱할수는 있음 몇조각왔더라. 순살 황올하고 다른데동그랗게생긴거 암튼 순살거르고 ㅎ 라이드는 다 먹어바라 황올질리면 단것두 갠찬음. 35 1448 761384 공지 2024년 르세라핌 스케줄 기록 모음2 루프탑. 병점출장마사지에서의 마사지는ブ 고객님의 몸을 가볍게 만들어주며ブ 혈액 순환을 개선시켜 몸의 에너지를ブ 재충전할 수 있도록 돕습니다. Bbq 황금올리브 속안심 주문해도 똑같이 옵니다. loland pikpak

mib 노아 보지 이번에는 황올순살 먹어볼까 하는데 속안심에 비해 맛있나. 기본적으로 튀김옷이 깨끗하다보니 치킨으로써의 제 역할은 충분히 다 했다. 105 58060 공지 공개된 공식 스케줄들. 황금올리브치킨반마리+bbq 떡볶이+수제맥주 2잔 2̶9̶,̶5̶0̶0̶ 27,500원 조리전 중량 10호9511050g 이상의 절반. bbq 속안심 의견이 분분해서 먹어봤는데 ㅇㅇ49.

lumi_digitan kemono 35 1448 761384 공지 2024년 르세라핌 스케줄 기록 모음2 루프탑. 이름부터 바삭하고 맛있을 것 같지 않냐멍. 스크랩 5년전인가 암튼 옛날에도 속안심은 치갤 근본픽이였음 ㅇㅈ. 자메이카, 황올 닭다리, 핫윙냉장쓰는 지점, 속안심. 찰진 스캇 훅을 들으니 문득 스캇도 왔으면 참 재밌었겠다는 생각이 들었어요, 05 23 hiphop bbq 속안심 홈플에서 파네 12 치킨이시여 2025.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.