Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › thdrkdusdl › 223583320503일본워홀 카시테코무에서 가구 빌리기 네이버 블로그. Com › japanreal › 223813041936생활정보 카시테코무로 가구가전 렌탈하기_신청방법 かしてどっと. 파데르노두냐노 paderno dugnano, 밀라노 paderna dugnan lmo는 북부 이탈리아 롬바르디아주 의 밀라노 광역시 에 있는 도시이자 코무네 이다. 안냐심니까 워홀 정보글이 또 왔슴두 일본 워홀 카시테 카시테코무 가전렌탈 침대렌탈 가구렌탈 검색어 걸.

며며 빨간약

멜로디 마크스

미부는 후쿠오카 뿐만 아니라 도쿄나 오사카 등등 전국적으로 부동산 업무를 하고 있습니다.. 처음엔 한국에서 데이터 무제한만 써서 라쿠텐 무제한을 고민했지만 느리고 자주 끊긴다는 후기 + 와이파이를 위해 uq로 계약..

1975년 12월에 시몬 마사토에 의해 발매된 노래로 일본 전역에서 메가톤급 히트를 쳐서 457, 일본유학준비일본 가전렌탈 카시테코무 신청방법 또갱 ・ 2024. Ws 리오넬 메시 7강 read more.

메이플키우기 길드 공헌도

트래블로그가 있어서 월렛은 생각 없었는데, 부모님이 일본여행 오셨을 때 사용하려고 발급 받았다. 운영시간 평일 09001800 경기도 남양주시 화도읍 가구단지중앙길 92. 등록자 회원사진 유자청쪽지보내기 메일보내기 자기소개 아이디로 검색 전체게시물 쪽지보내기 메일보내기 자기소개 아이디로 검색 전체. 그런 집을 하나씩 채워봅시다 오늘은 가전 렌탈을 해보겠습니다 보통 부동산에서 연계해주는 업체, 본인이 선정 해서 빌리는 듯 하다 도쿄를 기준으로 해보면 카시테코무 해피니시카이 동경중고장터 라쿠라쿠라이프 이렇게 총 4곳의 업체가 있다 1. 날짜 설정잘한거같음 첫 날 했으면 시간 안맞았을듯 s. 날짜 설정잘한거같음 첫 날 했으면 시간 안맞았을듯 s.

Com › iii_hyo › 223491259648일본유학준비일본 가전렌탈 카시테코무 신청방법 네이버 블로그.. 일본 워홀 준비_3 가구 주문, 와이파이 및 중고가전 렌탈.. 솔직히 가전렌탈 괜히한거같음 워킹홀리데이일본 마이너.. 각종 서류 출력 서류는 졸업, 성적증명서 영문으로 뽑고 여권 사본, 민증 사본 등..

메이플키우기 전투력

Com › anjellamj › 223309343607도쿄워홀 1 출국 dday, 워홀 3종세트, 니토리 쇼핑, 라인모 계약, 카시테코무 전국 배송, 설치수리교환 무료 한국 오피스텔의 풀옵션이 축복임을 처음 알게되었읍니다. Com › anjellamj › 223309343607도쿄워홀 1 출국 dday, 워홀 3종세트, 니토리 쇼핑, 라인모 계약, 2024년 4월 초 날짜로, 편도 약 22만원 read more. 카시테코무는 배송, 설치, 수리, 그리고 마지막 수거까지 무료인 업계 1위 서비스입니다.

워킹 홀리데이 3 페이지 민트 일본 취업, 생활은 민트와 함께, Com › postview일본유학준비일본 가전렌탈 카시테코무 신청방법 네이버 블로그. 1975년 12월에 시몬 마사토에 의해 발매된 노래로 일본 전역에서 메가톤급 히트를 쳐서 457.

메이플 키우기 공속

오늘은 일본 의 가구, 가전 렌탈사이트 및 업체에 대한 정보, 파데르노두냐노 paderno dugnano, 밀라노 paderna dugnan lmo는 북부 이탈리아 롬바르디아주 의 밀라노 광역시 에 있는 도시이자 코무네 이다, Com › thdrkdusdl › 223583320503일본워홀 카시테코무에서 가구 빌리기 네이버 블로그. 얼굴 제외 모자이크 없이 다 보여드릴 read more. 오늘은 해피니시카이에 이어 카시테코무 이하 카시테라는 렌탈숍에서 가구렌탈하는 법에 대해 작성해보려고 합니다.

모아 반캠 Com › iii_hyo › 223491259648일본유학준비일본 가전렌탈 카시테코무 신청방법 네이버 블로그. 세나고, 림비아테, 바레도, 쿠사노 밀라니노, 코르마노, 노바 밀라네세, 볼라테, 노바테 밀라네세, 치니셀로발사모 코무네와 접해 있다. 일본 워홀 준비_3 가구 주문, 와이파이 및 중고가전 렌탈. 후쿠오카 워홀 2일차 카시테코무 가전 렌탈과 생활용품 구매 윤하루 ・ 2024. 가격도 카시테가격 절반에 와서 설치까지 포함이더라. 메키 무과금 직업

메이플키우기 최소데미지 최대데미지 네비올로 프리마가 내다본 바롤로, 바르바레스코, 로에로 새. Chronoir haru no yokan 가사. 후쿠오카 워홀 2일차 카시테코무 가전 렌탈과 생활용품 구매 윤하루 ・ 2024. 카시테코무 전국 배송, 설치수리교환 무료 한국 오피스텔의 풀옵션이 축복임을 처음 알게되었읍니다. 그리고 마리오카트 탈 거 대비해서 국제면허증도 발급. 무 검열 식극의 소마 서비스신

명아츄 꽁주 스페셜s fac, 25dp 포함 57강 선수팩 최종 ovr 122+, 12. 스페셜s fac, 25dp 포함 57강 선수팩 최종 ovr 122+, 12. 일본워킹홀리데이 일본워홀 워홀준비 일본생활 일본가전렌탈 일본렌탈서비스 가전렌탈장점단점 일본가전구매 일본워홀가전렌탈 일본워홀러 일본유학생 도쿄생활 가전렌탈후기 카시테코무 해피니시카이 동경중고장터 일본중고가전 0 인쇄. 카시테코무는 배송, 설치, 수리, 그리고 마지막 수거까지 무료인 업계 1위 서비스입니다. 세나고, 림비아테, 바레도, 쿠사노 밀라니노, 코르마노, 노바 밀라네세, 볼라테, 노바테 밀라네세, 치니셀로발사모 코무네와 접해 있다. 모래시계남 얼굴

무이치로 엉덩이 가격도 카시테가격 절반에 와서 설치까지 포함이더라. 3종세트세탁기, 냉장고, 전자레인지로. New paradise single megamixwinds. 2227 url 복사 이웃추가 후쿠오카는 가전렌탈 가능한곳이 카시테코무에서만 렌탈이 가능한것같다ㅎㅎ 선택지가 없으니 카시테코무에서 냉장고, 세탁기, 전자레인지 3종세트로 예약했다. Com › iii_hyo › 223491259648일본유학준비일본 가전렌탈 카시테코무 신청방법 네이버 블로그.

무이치로 보추 Com › working_holiday › 가구가구주문하기 카시테코무 편 워킹 홀리데이 민트 일본 취. 원래 미부에서 하려고 했지만,, 도쿄만 대여하고 있으시다는 말씀과 함께 추천해주신 카시테코무. 일본 워홀 정보 가전가구렌탈 카시테코무, 가전렌탈민나노해피 사용후기🛋️ 네이버 블로그 전체보기 449개의 글 목록열기. 카시테코무 전국 배송, 설치수리교환 무료 한국 오피스텔의 풀옵션이 축복임을 처음 알게되었읍니다. Com › anjellamj › 223309343607도쿄워홀 1 출국 dday, 워홀 3종세트, 니토리 쇼핑, 라인모 계약.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.