Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

7월 10일에 지급되며, 6월 10일은 6월 만근이기에 정상지급. 67점, 채용인원 13명 군사정보 69. 46만원가량을 받으셨어야 하니 20만원가량을 반납하시게 될겁니다. 많은 성인들이 주의력결핍 과잉행동장애adhd를 진단받지 못한 채 생활하고 있는 것으로 추정된다.

Es 101 도리

Ehentai Nipplefuck

12월 전역자 군적금 관련 질문입니다.. 뱃살 존나 달고와서 런닝머신이나 이두운동만 처하고앉아서 폰보는데 패고싶노 ㅋㅋ 타중대라서 말도 못하고.. 축구화 구매비나 이발비, 효도휴가비도 지원받지 못한다.. 병장 기준으로 기존 125만 원에서 150만 원으로 25만 원 인상되었으며, 다른 계급도 비례하여 올랐습니다..

Donottrythisath Twitter

7월 10일에 지급되며, 6월 10일은 6월 만근이기에 정상지급. 2025년, 군 복무에 대한 처우가 한층 개선되면서 병사부터 장군까지 군인의 월급 체계가 다시 주목받고 있습니다, tipaboutroka 님의 블로그 입니다, 전문적인 사회복지서비스를 통해 남양주 북부권역의 든든한 복지 read more.

이번 제도들의 변화는 군인 봉급 인상부터 예비군 훈련비 지급, 여군 예비역 대상 확대. 내가 군생활중 겪은 일이엿음 ㅋㅋ 그런말있잖아 국국병원 여군들 떡 ㅈㄴ친다고 그거 팩트인듯. 이번 글에서는 2025년 기준 군인 월급, 장병내일준비적금, 예비군 훈련비 등 최신 정보를 상세하게 안내해드리겠습니다, 안녕하십니까 오는 8월 10일 전역을 예정중인 현역 병장입니다.

Eatha 화보

Eemiilyemiiikaa

많은 성인들이 주의력결핍 과잉행동장애adhd를 진단받지 못한 채 생활하고 있는 것으로 추정된다. 제가 24년 7월입대인데 26년 1월까지 군적금 든다하면 전역할때쯤 얼마로 나가나요, 3비 병사분들 있으신가요 공군 갤러리.

erome 지인능욕 병 일용품비는 세면도구세수 비누, 샴푸, 바디워시 등와 같은 소모품을 개인이 직접 구매할 수 있도록 매월 11,550원이 지급되는 지원금입니다. 이미지 군생활하면서 일용품비 두번 너프처먹네. 본인은 18년11월군번이고 작년여름에 전역했음 안그래도 입대한것도 쟛같을텐데 다들 개빡세게 구르는것보단 달달하게. Com김호랑 병장의 군대에 관한 모든 꿀팁. 2025년 군인 월급 지급일과 사용처 안내 2025년은 군인 월급 지급에 있어 중요한 전환점이 될 것입니다. erome 팬티

erome korean teacher 북부희망케어센터는 2007년 개소 이래 지금까지 사례관리, 서비스제공, 지역조직화 등 다양하고. 인상 계획은 국방부의 20242028 국방중기계획에 따라 추진되고 있습니다. 안녕하십니까 기말고사 시험을 대신하여 안녕하십니까 기말고사 시험을 대신하여 징병제 국가들에 대해서 리서치 페이퍼를 작성하고 있는데 궁금한 것들도 있고 자료를 찾는것이 쉽지않아 현재 나라를 지키고 계시는 군인분들이나 군대를 다녀오신 분들께 도움을 받고자 하여 지식인에 질문을. 아 참고로 병일용품비 같은 기본 수당도 일할계산해야해서 이것들도 위와 같은 공식으로 계산해서 반납하셔야 합니다. 2025년 군인 월급 지급일과 사용처 안내 2025년은 군인 월급 지급에 있어 중요한 전환점이 될 것입니다. dmm 순위

dotori305 onlyfans 병장 기준으로 기존 125만 원에서 150만 원으로 25만 원 인상되었으며, 다른 계급도 비례하여 올랐습니다. 특히 병장의 경우 월급이 약 205만 원으로 인상되어 많은 관심을 받고 있습니다. 병장 기준으로 기존 125만 원에서 150만 원으로 25만 원 인상되었으며, 다른 계급도 비례하여 올랐습니다. 내년부터 병사들은 생일날 특식으로 케이크를 받지 못하게 된다. 이 시 기는 유럽의 부르지아가 자유주의적 자본주의 경제를 만개시키면서 유럽과 세계를 정복한 격동의 시대. dolittle 시청하세요 온라인

di겜 영상 점수는 어찌저찌돼는데 제가진짜 머리가 않좋습니다 가서 일적응 못할수도있나요. 고잔묘 묘정의 청의동자비 91p 용품 장만에 천만 원이 들었다. 이때에는 기본급+병일용품비단, 전역일 당일까지 일할계산+전역여비를 합한 금액이 입금됩니다. 다음으로 일용품 구입1만5000원, 통신비1만4000원, 자기계발비1만3000원 순이었다. 안녕하십니까 기말고사 시험을 대신하여 안녕하십니까 기말고사 시험을 대신하여 징병제 국가들에 대해서 리서치 페이퍼를 작성하고 있는데 궁금한 것들도 있고 자료를 찾는것이 쉽지않아 현재 나라를 지키고 계시는 군인분들이나 군대를 다녀오신 분들께 도움을 받고자 하여 지식인에 질문을.

erome sns 2023년 현재 군인 급여는 얼마인가요. 성인의 경우 증상이 비교적 미묘하게 나타나기. 2023년 현재 군인 급여는 얼마인가요. 군 복무 중에도 자산 형성과 전역 후 사회복귀에 도움이 될 수 있도록 설계된 제도입니다. 이 시 기는 유럽의 부르지아가 자유주의적 자본주의 경제를 만개시키면서 유럽과 세계를 정복한 격동의 시대.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.