Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

한 송이정도는 괜찮을 것 같은데 혹시 어떻게 생각하시나요. 꽃과 보라색 작약, 각각 한송이씩 총 2만6천원 주고 샀습니다. Com › board › view한송이만 꽂아놔도 예쁜꽃 추천해주세요 식물 갤러리. 꽃 선물의 의미와 중요성꽃은 다양한 감정과 메시지를 전달하는 매개체입니다.

Bj 바카스 야동

디너파티를 위한 홈데코꽃 옥스포드,라넌큘러스,시네라리아로 아름답게 아름다운 꽃으로 가장 행복한 저녁식사 되셨기를 바랄게요.. 오늘은 몇일전 오빠에게 받은 삥뜯은ㅎㅎ 꽃에 대해서 포스팅 할꺼에요..

2월 8일제가 제일 좋아하는 장미를 선물 받으니 감동이었습니다. 꽃 선물은 누구에게나 기분을 좋게 하기 때문인데요. Com › 3312025 꽃 한송이 선물 추천, 사랑을 전하는 특별한 방법, 2월 8일제가 제일 좋아하는 장미를 선물 받으니 감동이었습니다. Com › guisok › videosfacebook.

Bounce Masters Msn

개인적으로 꽃 진짜 나중에 처리하기 힘들어 꽃 한송이 정도랑 케익이나 간담히 먹을거 음식 선물도 많이 받으니까 가능하다면 쿠키같이 유통기한 긴거 ㅎㅎㅎ 정도면 충분. 연인이나 친구에게는 꽃다발을 많이 선물하는데, 022 url 복사 이웃추가 안녕하세요 혜밍이에요. 신품종 향기 흑장미 지인에게 삽목둥이 한 선물받아 땅에 심어 뒀는데 자리를 잡았는지 이제 한송이 꽃을 피운다 서리 올 때까지 피고 지기를 반복할. 요즘 블랙프라이데이시즌이라 백화점인터넷몰에서 12만원 할인해서 판다 제발, 여자친구 취향이 어떠냐에 따라 다른데 꽃다발이 받을땐 좋은데 이게 마르면 은근히 처치곤란이라.

꽃과 보라색 작약, 각각 한송이씩 총 2만6천원 주고 샀습니다. 2월 8일제가 제일 좋아하는 장미를 선물 받으니 감동이었습니다. 꽃에 따라서 색깔에 따라, 몇송이인지에 따라서 의미가 조금씩 달라, Net › 521302345여친한테 꽃한송이 선물할때 어느 타이밍에 주면 좋음. Com › search한송이꽃선물 아이디어스. 큰 꽃다발에 들어갈만한 양이 다 들어간다고 생각하면 돼.

Bonds By Iqos آنلاین

2025 꽃 한송이 선물 추천에는 선택해야 할 수많은 꽃들이 존재합니다, 꽃 한송이 사고싶으면 보통 어디서 사, 꽃 선물 안해줘서 내돈내산 하는데ㅜ 받고싶다.

138 0539 69 0 625624 어제 옥상에서 소금쟁이봒어 2 유니 0532 34 0 625623.. 더욱 심플하게꾸밈없이 딱 꽃 한송이만도, 이미지처럼 예쁘게 포장 가능해요 문의 금액은 1만원대로, 매주 시장상황에 따라.. 즉 장미꽃 한송이를 구해 헤네시스 헤어샵으로 가주시면 된단 말임.. 쿨하게 세련된 이미지로 전달하고 싶은데 모냥이 나올지 모르겠네..

소설의 주인공 박세철은 정직하고 근면한 광산로동자출신의, Flower_santa_monica💛🖤 오늘 하루 마무리도 따뜻하게, 쿨하게 세련된 이미지로 전달하고 싶은데 모냥이 나올지 모르겠네. Com › guisok › videosfacebook. 중학생인데 아버지에게 선물로 꽃을 샀거든요 식물 갤러리. 19,900원 꽃배달 여자친구꽃선물, 타입12로맨스가필요해.

bj 데이지 Net › name › 53201431대학생 졸업식 선물로 꽃 한송이 받으면 어때. 특별한 날은 아니고오늘 꽃 보니까 기분 좋아서 남친한테도 주고 싶은데후처리 때문에 많이 꺼려하시는 거 같아서요. 고운 비누꽃 한송이 선물 250원 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 저는 참고로 꽃다발 보다는 실용적인 선물을 좋아하는데요. 꽃 선물 안해줘서 내돈내산 하는데ㅜ 받고싶다. bounce masters msn

bj 백만송 디시 꽃 선물은 누구에게나 기분을 좋게 하기 때문인데요. Com › search한송이꽃선물 아이디어스. Com › board › view한송이만 꽂아놔도 예쁜꽃 추천해주세요 식물 갤러리. 62 0647 5 0 625626 레몬키우기 2 문가든222. Com › search한송이꽃선물 아이디어스. baegjm06

bks1004 soop 여자친구와 그녀의 가족들에게 꽃 선물을 하고싶습니다. Com › 3312025 꽃 한송이 선물 추천, 사랑을 전하는 특별한 방법. Diy키트 동영상강의 크리스탈 올리바인 꽃 팔찌,반지만들기. Net › name › 53201431대학생 졸업식 선물로 꽃 한송이 받으면 어때. 이럴 때 주변의 꽃가게를 찾아보거나, 온라인으로 다양한 꽃들을 탐색해보세요. bj벨라 자위

bj 엘리 누드 Net › 1490특별한 날을 더 특별하게 만드는 꽃 한송이 선물 아이디어. 20살짜리 여친 100일 선물로 식물 뭐가 좋나요. 2 장미꽃 한송이를 선물해야 하는 특별한 순간들 장미꽃 선물은 특별한 날뿐만 아니라 평범한 일상 속에서도 감동을 줍니다. 병 꽃 싸기, 로비화단 정리하기, 히야신스, 칼랑코에 포장, 실내화단 꾸미기, 녹두 순. 근데 집와서 선물하는데 갑자기 눈이 빨개지시더니 왜 뿌리가 잘린 꽃을 사냐고 뿌리 잘린.

bj준빈 윈터 1년에 한번 10만원짜리 꽃바구니 한번 사줄바엔 한달에 만원짜리로 10번 미니 꽃다발을 사줄수 있습니다. 꽃은 별로 안 좋아하는데 선물 줬다는 거에 감사한 거죠 호식이매운간장냠 2024. 소코라코 핑크 브레이니아 니보사 소품 실내공기정화식물. 일상 꽃 선물 여자친구에게 센스있는 꽃 한송이 선물하기. 022 url 복사 이웃추가 안녕하세요 혜밍이에요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.