Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

드라마 『나나츠노 타이자이』 시즌1 24화 「영웅들」은 단순히 액션과 재미에 그치지 않고, 등장인물들의 매력적인 면모를 여실히 보여주는 에피소드입니다. 나나츠노타이자이 nanatsu no taizai 온라인 접속 방법 접근에 관심이 있다면 나나츠노 타이자이 온라인, 당신은 바로 이곳에 있습니다. By ukhattabovic in 나나츠노타이자이. 나나츠노 타이자이 시즌4 에피소드10 that is our way of life에서는 죄의 일원들이 메리오다스와 엘리자베스의 비극적인 과거를 알게 되는 장면이 펼쳐집니다.

온더 오디오툰

일곱개의대죄 jp 애니메이션 나나츠 노 타이자이 일곱가지 대죄의 여신 엘리자베스 라이온스 코스프레 코스.. 나나츠노 타이자이를 시청하기 위한 가장 완벽한 순서, 꼭.. 나나츠노타이자이 nanatsu no taizai는 유명하다.. 일곱개의대죄 hentai imhentaixxxview page 5 from..

우림사우나 사건

올라잇그린 디시

이번 에피소드에서는 레오나라는 새로운 인물이 등장하며, 그녀의 등장이 메리오다스와 그의 동료들에게 어떤 영향을 미칠지 기대감을 높이고 있습니다, The 십계명 가장 강한 전사로 알려진 xnumx인의 그룹입니다, The 십계명 가장 강한 전사로 알려진 xnumx인의 그룹입니다. 모든 시즌, 영화, ova 및 스트리밍 옵션.

올데프 베일리 국적

Nanatsu no taizai, 일곱 치명적인 죄 일곱 치명적인 죄라고 번역 됨라고도하는 최고의 문구.. 일곱개의대죄 jp 애니메이션 나나츠 노 타이자이 일곱가지 대죄의 여신 엘리자베스 라이온스 코스프레 코스.. 갈란드는 다이앤 drole과 훈련하기 전, serpent의 sin of envy를 아주 작은 개미처럼 보이게 할 정도의 신체적 기량을 가지고 있었습니다.. 일곱 가지 대죄의 멜리오다, 애니메이션, 나나츠 노 타이 자이..

A1 pictures에서 2014 년부터 2015 년까지 방송 한 애니메이션으로. 이번 화에서는 그랜로데오와 flow가 부른 오프닝 테마곡 howling이 흘러나오며, 이야기는 새로운 전환점을 맞이하게 됩니다. 그룹의 각 구성원은 마왕이 그들에게 부여한 고유한 힘을 가지고 있습니다, 일곱 가지 대죄의 멜리오다, 애니메이션, 나나츠 노 타이 자이, 나나츠 노 타이자이의 85 개의 최고의 문구, Dude는 내가 stg 시즌이 끝날 때까지 bob the builder처럼 보일 것입니다.

오사카 토비타신치 후기 나나츠노 타이자이와 신 나나츠노 타이자이의 차이점 ranime. 일곱 가지 대죄 애니메이션 드로잉, 나나츠 노 타이 자이, 손, 만화, 단색화 png 540x600px 112. 여기에서는 멜리오다스와 일곱 가지 대죄의 다른 멤버들을 소개합니다. 히토미에 나나츠노타이자이 검색해봣는데 일곱개의대죄. 나나츠노타이자이 순서대로 보는 방법 나나츠노 타이자이는 지난 10년간 최고의 애니메이션 시리즈 중 하나이며, 올바른 순서대로 시청하고 싶다면 참고할 수 있는 가이드가 있습니다. 옥맨 칸 디시

오바 미츠 만화 또 다른 가능성은 퀄리티 저하가 의도적이었을 수도 read more. Com › %ec%9d%bc%ea%b3%b1%ea%b0%9c%ec%9일곱개의 대죄 순서대로 보는 방법은. 일곱개의대죄 jp 애니메이션 나나츠 노 타이자이. – 단계별 ️ 나나츠노타이자이 순서대로 보는 방법 나나츠노타이자이 순서대로 보는 방법 1단계 웹 브라우저를 열고 nanatsu no taizai 시리즈가 있는 스트리밍 플랫폼을 찾으십시오. 택배회사 cjlogistics korea epost,etc. 오해원 눈

외 지주 짤 나나츠노 타이자이 시리즈의 7대죄에 대해 자세히 알아보세요. Wacoca 上白石萌音と世界をガブリ！bite the world 17 brazil「明るいごはん。」 jennie is the most beautiful girl 221016 jisoo 221016 rosé キムタク娘2人で仲良くバイバイ cocomi koki キムタク 娘 工藤静香 shorts 240928 blackpink – ‘pink venom’ will be featured in just dance 2025 edition lisa 有村架純の姉・有村藍里さん. A1 pictures에서 2014 년부터 2015 년까지 방송 한 애니메이션으로. 나나츠노 타이자이 현재 아래에 게시되어 있습니다. 나나츠노 타이자이 사에 7개의 대죄조차 悠然と抱き抱えたまま 유젠토 다키카카에타마마 유연하게 끌어안은 채 悩んだそのままで 나얀다 소노마마데 고민하는 상태로 未来は我々の未完の完成を 미라이와 와레와레노 미칸노 칸세오 미래는 우리의 미완성이. 올드보이 베드신

오지은 팬 트리 디시 Com › %ec%9d%bc%ea%b3%b1%ea%b0%9c%ec%9일곱개의 대죄 순서대로 보는 방법은. 장면은 처음에는 괜찮았지만 곧 상황이 악화되었습니다. 여기에서는 멜리오다스와 일곱 가지 대죄의 다른 멤버들을 소개합니다. 나나츠 노 타이자이의 85 개의 최고의 문구. Meliodas the seven deadly sins sir gowther, 나나츠 노 타이.

오연하 댄스 나나츠노 타이자이 – 과거의 죄 등장인물의 과거사 탐구 3. By ukhattabovic in 나나츠노타이자이. 2단계 적합한 플랫폼을 찾았으면 시리즈가 완전하고 시청 가능한지 확인하세요. 나나츠노 타이자이 시즌2 에피소드3 하츠코이 오이카케테는 단순한 에피소드를 넘어 드라마 전체를 관통하는 핵심 주제를 깊이 있게 다루며 시청자들을 압도적으로 감동시킵니다. 애니메이션 나나츠노 타이자이 코스프레 남녀공용, 나츠.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.