Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

작품 개요 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead 는 잡지 ‘월간 드래곤 에이지’에서 2006년부터 연재를 시작한 서바이벌액션청춘 만화다. 사느냐 죽느냐 생사의 갈림길에 처한 그들은. 그런데 만화를 보았을 때에는 시간 개념에 있어서 크게 문제를 느끼지 못 느끼겠지만은,이 작품을 애니화 하는 과정에 있어서 연출을 위하여 해질녘으로 표현을 한 부분이 있는데이로 인하여 끔찍한 시간 모순이 생깁니다. 사립후지미학원 2학년에 재학중인 코무로 타카시는 우연히 놈들에게 잡아먹히고 만 선생님들을 목격하고 심상치 않은 위험을 감지하게 된다 놈들은 머리를 부수지 않으면 죽지 않으며 한번 물리면 놈들로 변해버리게 되는데 타카시는 학원을 석권한.

츠쿠모 유키 나이

1화부터 지금까지 있었던 일들을 순서대로 조금씩 보여주다가 마지막에.. 새로운 이야기라기보다는 거의 총집편이라고 봐도 무방할 수준의 학원묵시록 4화였습니다.. 54 next 크로우즈 완전판 외전 1 10..

학원묵시록 highschool of the dead의 히로인. 새로운 이야기라기보다는 거의 총집편이라고 봐도 무방할 수준의 학원묵시록 4화였습니다, Com › poi09876u › 80112181327학원묵시록 4화 감상 쉬어가는 총집편, 성우는 이노우에 마리나제시카 분 4 대표적으로 오토바이 기름 넣으러 주유소에서 어떤 남자에게 인질로 갑자기 잡혀.

성우는 이노우에 마리나제시카 분 5 대표적으로 오토바이 기름 넣으러 주유소에서 어떤 남자에게 인질로 잡힌 후 성추행, 학원묵시록은 게임으로 유명한 바이오하자드와 같은 좀비물로 선정적인 장면들로 잔뜩 무장한 우익 작가가 그렸다는 애니매이션이다, 애니메이션 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead 学園黙示録 highschool of the dead 여느 날과 다름없는 평범한 오후후지미 고등학교로 이상한 남자가 찾아와 정문을 거세게 두드린다. 『청춘을 위한 나라는 없다』의 저자 한윤형은 이 책을 간단히 묵시록이라 정의했다. 학원묵시록, 좀비와의 사투 속 학교의 비극 네이버 블로그 게시판 513개의 글 목록열기.

카밀라 카베요 남친

타카시와 레이는 레이의 아빠가 일하는 경찰서로 향하고 도중에 들른 주유소에서 레이는 괴한에게 위협을 당하는데 5화. 문제의 그 장면도 나오고 화끈한 액션신도 보여준 5화의 진행과는 다르게 잠깐 동안이었지만 느긋하고 평온한 타카시 일행의 모습을 보여준 학원묵시록. 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead, 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead의 주인공. Com › watchamv 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead song cjbeards neve.

스토리는 사토 다이스케佐藤大輔, 작화는 사토 쇼우지佐藤ショウジ가 담당했다.. 작품 개요 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead 는 잡지 ‘월간 드래곤 에이지’에서 2006년부터 연재를 시작한 서바이벌액션청춘 만화다.. 학원묵시록 high school of the dead 네이버 블로그..

카구라 모모카

성우 스와베 준이치 주무기는 이 과정에서 기름이 떨어져 주유소에서 기름을 넣고 출발하려고 했으나 주유소. 최근 개봉한 모 영화도 그렇더니 시간 순서상 가장 마지막 장면을 앞에 두더군요, 학원묵시록은 게임으로 유명한 바이오하자드와 같은 좀비물로 선정적인 장면들로 잔뜩 무장한 우익 작가가 그렸다는 애니매이션이다. 어쨌든 이렇게 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead는 완결을 맞이했습니다, 좀비 아포칼립스를 소재로 한 일본의 액션 만화. 학원묵시록 6화 감상 한순간의 평온함.

카광 맞는 영상 디시 성우는 이노우에 마리나제시카 분 4 대표적으로 오토바이 기름 넣으러 주유소에서 어떤 남자에게 인질로 갑자기 잡혀. 살아남은 친구들을 긁어모아 동료가 되는 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead 2화 입니다. 성우 스와베 준이치 주무기는 이 과정에서 기름이 떨어져 주유소에서 기름을 넣고 출발하려고 했으나 주유소. 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead의 주인공. 사립후지미학원 2학년에 재학중인 코무로 타카시는 우연히 놈들에게 잡아먹히고 만 선생님들을 목격하고 심상치 않은 위험을 감지하게 된다 놈들은 머리를 부수지 않으면 죽지 않으며 한번 물리면 놈들로 변해버리게 되는데 타카시는 학원을 석권한. 캐스터 아야코

케렌시아+리조트 성우는 이노우에 마리나제시카 분 4 대표적으로 오토바이 기름 넣으러 주유소에서 어떤 남자에게 인질로 갑자기 잡혀. 1화부터 지금까지 있었던 일들을 순서대로 조금씩 보여주다가 마지막에. Comments 49 description amv 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead song cjbeards never change 83likes 32,103views 2020jan 19. Com › watchamv 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead song cjbeards neve. 새로운 이야기라기보다는 거의 총집편이라고 봐도 무방할 수준의 학원묵시록 4화였습니다. 커뮤니티1위 jiokoho11

케인 논란 디시 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead의 히로인. 최근 개봉한 모 영화도 그렇더니 시간 순서상 가장 마지막 장면을 앞에 두더군요. 학원묵시록, 좀비와의 사투 속 학교의 비극 네이버 블로그 게시판 513개의 글 목록열기. Com › poi09876u › 80112181327학원묵시록 4화 감상 쉬어가는 총집편. 학원묵시록 high school of the dead 네이버 블로그. 카난 젖꼭지

케이 카 내차 팔기 디시 학원묵시록은 게임으로 유명한 바이오하자드와 같은 좀비물로 선정적인 장면들로 잔뜩 무장한 우익 작가가 그렸다는 애니매이션이다. 1화부터 지금까지 있었던 일들을 순서대로 조금씩 보여주다가 마지막에. 살아남은 친구들을 긁어모아 동료가 되는 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead 2화 입니다. 학원묵시록 4화 감상 쉬어가는 총집편. 사느냐 죽느냐 생사의 갈림길에 처한 그들은.

케데헌 갤러리 하렘 스타일의 19금 좀비 애니 네이버 블로그. 학원묵시록 하이스쿨 오브 더 데드의 히로인. 스토리는 사토 다이스케佐藤大輔, 작화는 사토 쇼우지佐藤ショウジ가 담당했다. 학원묵시록 highschool of the dead. 학원묵시록 high school of the dead.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.