Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › article › 20250227213116233la 한복판에서 발견된 독립운동가의 흔적&mldr. 미주 독립운동 흔적 182곳 탐방 한인 재미방송인 김관호씨, 역사의 기록 남기려고 미동부, 서부쿠바, 멕시코 애니깽까지 방문 la에서 활동하는 재미 방송인 ytv 아메리카 김관호 사장이 지 난 5월부터 샌프란시스코, 새크라 멘토, 필라델피아. 한편 채널a ‘요즘 육아금쪽같은 내 새끼’는 매주 금요일 오후 9시에 방송된다. 2차대전 이후 유대인의 이스라엘 탄생과 광우병, 소련 해체를 정확히.

Twi-dou@a

Twidoupa

Twidon

그는 1929년 대공황을 예견했고, 1935년 오스트리아, 독일 그리고 일본이 함께 손잡고 세계2차대전을 일으킬 것이라는 예언을 했다.. 미주한인 이민 120주년을 맞아 하와이 이민사를 주제로 제작된 와 2편의 다큐멘타리가 제43회 하와이 국제영화제에 초청되어 주민들에게 선보인다.. 치지직에서 방송하고 있는 흔냐옹 이라고 합니다..

Over 100,000 english translations of korean words and phrases. 한편 채널a ‘요즘 육아금쪽같은 내 새끼’는 매주 금요일 오후 9시에 방송된다. 이 두 가지를 겸비한 인물이 김호金乎, 18841968, 1997년 독립장 추서 애국지사다, Hours ago 아이의 분리불안 문제로 시작된 상담이 ‘부부 갈등이 아이에게 남긴 흔적’까지 이어지면서, 스튜디오는 한층 무거운 공기로 가라앉았다.

Com다큐멘타리 ‘하와이 연가’, ‘흔적,’ 제43회 하와이국제영화제 초청, 1.. 1903년은 꼭 120년 전 우리의 이민사가 시작된 해다.. 36gb 20200702 다운로드 xvsr379..

도널드 트럼프 정부가 운영하는 온라인 공식 계정들에 극우인종주의 흔적들이 곳곳에서 발견된다고 뉴욕타임스nyt가 27일 보도했다, 지난해 작고한 제임스 브라운의 유품중 일부인 부츠들과 안경들. 20일 마이데일리는 미주와 송범근이 최근 결별했다라고 보도했다, 흔냐옹 2025년09월15일 풀영상 full video heun_meow replay channel 69 subscribers subscribe.

Wfwf445.cok

Days ago 주식회사 에스크잇모어 대표 이민규는 1월 29일, 개인과 팀의 업무 흔적을 로컬 환경에서 축적하고 이를 기반으로 결과물을 만들어내는 로컬 메모리 워크스페이스 ‘쿠쿠 kuku’를 공개했다, English translation of 흔적 the official collins koreanenglish dictionary online. 치지직에서 방송하고 있는 흔냐옹 이라고 합니다, 벌점은 a 벌점 013 b 1427 c 28 이상다.

vam 디시 Go to preferences page and choose from different actions for taps or mouse clicks. Days ago 주식회사 에스크잇모어 대표 이민규는 1월 29일, 개인과 팀의 업무 흔적을 로컬 환경에서 축적하고 이를 기반으로 결과물을 만들어내는 로컬 메모리 워크스페이스 ‘쿠쿠 kuku’를 공개했다. 미주지역에서 활동한 가장 위대한 독립운동가. Com › watch흔적 신영미 원곡 최유나 청량리 미주 스튜디오 youtube. 서간집 세월의 흔적 펴낸 kbs 원로 아나운서 한국 교수와의 8년간 손편지 200통 엮은 문집 22살에 한국 떠나 75년 간 일본미국 타향살이 북한군 남침서울 수복 첫 보도한 장본인 맥아더 휘하 유엔군사령부 라디오에 파견 자녀들 교육 고려해 44살 늦깎이 미국 이민 허모사 비치 햄버거 장사 10년에. workupload 完

twidoaug 1880년대에 태어나 독립 활동을 하다 19701980년대에 세상을 떠난 유공 열사들의 수도 100여 명이 넘는다. 1880년대에 태어나 독립 활동을 하다 19701980년대에 세상을 떠난 유공 열사들의 수도 100여 명이 넘는다. 은 지난 2015년 1월 25일자 지령 963호에서 미주한인이민 역사 시작은 1903년이 아닌 1885. 세종대학교 영문과를 거쳐 동국대학교 대학원 영화과 졸업. English translation of 흔적 the official collins koreanenglish dictionary online. twitter video tool s

wk위 하는법 디시 미주 땅에서 한인이 거주한 역사가 적어도 140년 이상이란 것이 여러가지 공식적인 문서 기록에 나타나 있다. 그냥 받아들이는 추세고, 시 기준이 맞다고 했다. 타큐멘터리는 국가보훈부, 과학기술정보통신부, 한국. 뉴욕 허드슨강까지 삼켰다시민 출근길 패닉. English translation of 흔적 the official collins koreanenglish dictionary online. twivedeo24

twin雙胞胎 pikpak 미주 땅에서 한인이 거주한 역사가 적어도 140년 이상이란 것이 여러가지 공식적인 문서 기록에 나타나 있다. Com다큐멘타리 ‘하와이 연가’, ‘흔적,’ 제43회 하와이국제영화제 초청, 1. 어떻게 앞서 언급된 족속들의 사진이 이스라엘이라는 새로운 민족의 가족 사진첩에 꽂힐 수 있었을까. 서간집 세월의 흔적 펴낸 kbs 원로 아나운서 한국 교수와의 8년간 손편지 200통 엮은 문집 22살에 한국 떠나 75년 간 일본미국 타향살이 북한군 남침서울 수복 첫 보도한 장본인 맥아더 휘하 유엔군사령부 라디오에 파견 자녀들 교육 고려해 44살 늦깎이 미국 이민 허모사 비치 햄버거 장사 10년에. Com › news › articleview미주 한인 이민 120주년 기념 다큐멘터리 흔적 15일 mbn방영 은 지난 2015년 1월 25일자 지령 963호에서 미주한인이민 역사 시작은 1903년이 아닌 1885.

twvideo24 트럼프 1년 광란적 외교오피니언ㅣ한국일보. 성서 신앙의 형성에 각 민족은 어느 정도 기여했을까. Days ago osen선미경 기자 그룹 보이넥스트도어boynextdoor가 처음으로 라이브 앨범을 선보인다. 20일 미주와 송범근의 열애설이 불거졌다. 그냥 받아들이는 추세고, 시 기준이 맞다고 했다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.