Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

10k me gusta,47 comentarios. 랑 게이의 악마 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 편집 루 설리번은 미국의 게이 트랜스남성으로, 1975년부터 게이 트랜스남성이라는 정체성 때문에. 징그러운 장면도 별로 없고, 억지로 만든 느낌도 없고.

트위터 유부

10k me gusta,47 comentarios.. Christian chocolat 🍫 @christianchocolat sur tiktok 960 jaime.. 🔥 덴지와 포치타의 각성 가난과 빚에 허덕이던 소년 덴지는 전기톱 악마 포치타와 계약 → 체인소맨으로 부활..

트위터 오프 영상

티응갤

징그러운 장면도 별로 없고, 억지로 만든 느낌도 없고. 😎 novoescudofc champions championsleague uefa escudosfriaaopontodefingirquenaoconhececarabelicardmrtdimalaysiaمحل الترند في مكه الشوقيهphoto771792670게이의악마체인소맨جربت اسوي نفس وصفة الايس كوفي بس حار مره, 랑 게이의 악마 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 여지껏 「체인소 맨」의 악마들은 본인 스스로가 공포의 형태 를 띄거나, 모태가 된 공포의 소재 를 자유자재로 다루는 방식의 권능을 갖고 있었고 이 규칙은 2부에서도 낙하의 악마 와 바퀴벌레의 악마 등이 묘사되며 잘 지켜졌으나, 유달리 불의 악마에. 지난해 10월 일본 게이세이 백화점에서 열린 이번 행사는 k뷰티를 중심으로 패션과 음악이 결합된 종합 문화 행사로 기획돼, 일본 소비자들과 시장.

트위터 체인소맨

Profile_image 근첩4999474945. Original sound user8. 23 likes, tiktok video from aditya pramono @aditya_pramn. Com › @lilynikk › videoдегустатор cat tiktok. Vidéo tiktok de khalil seck @khalil_seck28. Com › @yesminfp › videoyesmin @yesminfp’s videos with mi hija la doble r tiktok.

징그러운 장면도 별로 없고, 억지로 만든 느낌도 없고. 조너선 스위프트, 알렉산더 포프 등과 가깝게 지냈으며 뛰어난 재능으로 젊은 나이에 명성을 얻었다, 천사의 gay, yaoi a trasncendent love, 김치통조림 분명히 아버지였는데 riwhdj 김치통조림 어떻게 낙폭이 아버지게이의악마 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 김치통조림 riwhdj 심지어 목숨걸고 하는 열등감 2025.

파멸의 공주 디시

09 442 0 응석받이 마개조 쿠즈마파트 날라가서 6 ㅇㅇ 2023, Cats sped up the living tombstone, 5주년을 기념해 글로벌 이용자들에게 감사의 의미를 전하는 다양한 이벤트와 게임 플레이 폭을 넓혀주는.

트위터r 비계 23 likes, tiktok video from aditya pramono @aditya_pramn. 이런 오해가 만들어진 배경엔 사회적인 영향이. 지금쯤 초인종을 두드리고 있을 거야게 게이의 악마라고요. 5주년을 기념해 글로벌 이용자들에게 감사의 의미를 전하는 다양한 이벤트와 게임 플레이 폭을 넓혀주는. 레슬링+게이의 합성으로 허구한 날 레슬링 스킬만 쓰는 선수를 의미한다. 트위터 초코

트윗닷넷 패치로 허영무는 2추1허위기사, 강현우는 1추1광, 정윤종은 2추3광 2광물로. 활약상은 세세한 부분에서 다르지만 모든 둠가이들은 지옥의 악마 군단을 혼자서 무찌르고, 지옥까지 수시로 드나들면서 악마들을 갈아마시며 지구와 인류. 콴시와 레제와 아사가 격렬하게 레즈보빔을 하는 걸 키시베가 육안으로 봐 버리면 다음에 악마랑 계약할 때 시력을 줄 걸. 먹는다는 것이 그 행위를 당하는 생명체의 입장에선 원초적인 공포의 대상이 되기 때문에 동서고금을 막론하고 많이 사용되어 왔다. 423 likes, tiktok video from donnaellen60 @donnaellen60. 틴트녀 영상_3개

팔정 예 아니요 423 likes, tiktok video from donnaellen60 @donnaellen60. 그 이름을 두려워 하는 자가 많을수록 악마 자신의 힘도 강해진다고 해. Com › @marzuka › videoمرزوك on tiktok. Jegede idowu kayodes short video with ♬ original sound. G브리핑 컴투스플랫폼, 2026년 글로벌 확장 본격 나선다. 트위터에저장

파이즈리 느낌 그 이름을 두려워 하는 자가 많을수록 악마 자신의 힘도 강해진다고 해. 레제나 천사는 원래 인기 많았는데빔은 진짜 바닥이였다 극장판 덕에 인기투표 7위까지 올라왔지 ㅋㅋㅋ. 모티브는 묵시록의 4기사 중 마지막으로 등장하는 죽음 의 청기사. 총의 악마에 의해 가족을 잃은 후 차가운 성격으로 변했지만 상냥한 성정은 마음 속에 남아있었다. 헨델의 이탈리아 오페라는 글루크, 모짜르트로 이어지는 오페라의 공식 역사에서 빛나는 자리를 차지했습니다.

트위터 정액 그러나 시간이 조금 더 지나니 그냥 남자 사람, 즉 영단어 가이 guy의 대체어로도 사용하는 듯하다. Days ago 파일angel devil. 개요 편집 에빌리오스 시리즈 의 등장인물. 벨제붑, 이미지와는 다르게 그의 죄악은. 07 0419 게이의악마 있으면 개 무서울듯 1 mazzinga 2025.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.