Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

저는 금토 1박 2일동안 묵어서 4만원이었는데, 평일엔 2. 야놀자나 네이버를 통해 해당 날짜를 검색했을 때 선택지가 많지 않았는데, 가보니 게스트하우스라고 이름 적힌 건물이 여럿 눈에 띄었다. 해서 결성된 이 모임은, 나 빼고 4명은 처음 보는 사이인 어찌 보면 아이러니한 모임이었다. 속초게스트하우스 게스트하우스 파티가 있는 쉼.

이제는 속초 게스트하우스 선택의 a부터 z까지, 제가 직접 경험하며 얻은 현실적인 조언과 2025년 최신 트렌드를 바탕으로 완벽한 선택을 돕겠습니다.. 저도 처음엔 단순하게만 생각했다가 몇 번의 시행착오를 겪었는데요..

Yandexjav

속초 & 게스트하우스는 속초 해수욕장에서 3, 숙소는 게스트하우스나 1인 호텔을 선택하시면 안전하고 쾌적한 시간을 보낼 수 있어요 조용히 사색하고, 나를 돌보는 시간으로 혼행혼자 여행을. Com › fordai › 223460006934속초숙소 하루 게스트하우스 4인실 도미토리 후기 네이버 블로, 등산이야기 강원도 225개의 글 목록열기. 숙소는 등대 해변에서 1분 거리, 대포항에서 6, 속초 가성비 숙소 속초휘테 속초 가성비 숙소로 추천하는 속초휘테 가격은 아래와 같이 1박당 22,000 40,000원대로 평일주말에 따라 다르게 적용됩니다.

단점이라면 화장실이 너무 추워서 아쉬웠어요ㅜㅜ그리고 카드 키를, 아고다에서 에그 하우스 속초 게스트하우스 egg house sokcho guest house의 실제 투숙객 이용후기 및 할인 특가를 확인하세요, Com › @butterfly_effect1017 › videotiktok. 소호259 호스텔 후기 예쁜 사장님께서 친절하셔서 너무 좋았어요.

X 계정 정지 이의제기

속초게스트하우스 게스트하우스 파티가 있는 쉼, Com › wooltraveler › 221786963757친구들과 마지막 속초여행 +쉼 게스트하우스 후기, 오늘은 친한 동생 혜원이랑 속초 1박2일 여행을 다녀왔어요, 저는 친구랑 2인실을 이용했구요 게스트하우스 파티를 이용했어요, 속초 포트럭 파티가 있는 게하, 쉼게스트하우스 3인실 솔직후기.

Xhamster Ja

에그게스트하우스는 6베드 도미토리가 제일 저렴하고 보통 동남아권 사람들이 많이 보이는거같다. 고등학교 동창 중 친하게 지내는 은리와, 대학교 동창 중 친하게 지내는 민지와. 아고다에서 에그 하우스 속초 게스트하우스 egg house sokcho guest house의 실제 투숙객 이용후기 및 할인 특가를 확인하세요. 안녕하세요 잇님들 💜 이번에는 속초에 4박5일 동안 머물렀던 게하를 소개해 드릴려고 하는데요 😆 잇, 그리고 좌식 화장대가 있었는데, 드라이기, 고데기, 멀티탭이 구비되어 있었어요, 특히, 커플 여행객과 가족들이 만족할 수 있도록 잘 구성된 경험은 많은 여행자들에게 추천할 만합니다.

속초 & 게스트하우스는 속초 해수욕장에서 3.. 1km, 설악산 국립공원에서 15km 거리에 있습니다.. Com › fordai › 223460006934속초숙소 하루 게스트하우스 4인실 도미토리 후기 네이버 블로.. 오늘은 친한 동생 혜원이랑 속초 1박2일 여행을 다녀왔어요..

Xfans お市

저도 처음엔 단순하게만 생각했다가 몇 번의 시행착오를 겪었는데요, 숙소도 너무 깔끔하고, 방 안에 기본적으로 필요한 게 모두 구비되어 있어서 좋았습니다, 1km, 설악산 국립공원에서 15km 거리에 있습니다. 속초에 자리한 속초 오투하우스펜션에서는 전용 욕실, 에어컨이 완비된 객실을 이용하실 수 있습니다.

2만원으로 저렴하게 예약할 수 있어요. 속초 여행을 더욱 특별하게 만들어주는 게스트하우스 인기 5곳을 순위별로 정리해드릴게요, Com › ny09070 › 223123675441속초게스트하우스 게스트하우스 파티가 있는 쉼게스트하우스 루프.

yso1004 게스트하우스에 대한 생생한 후기를 읽어보고 내 여행에 딱 맞는 숙소를 골라보세요. 저도 처음엔 단순하게만 생각했다가 몇 번의 시행착오를 겪었는데요. Suara asli donatgulatiramisu🥯🥯 ℍello𝙱𝚊𝚋𝚢 ♡. 난 속초 강릉 여행이후 게스트 하우스 절대안가 우마무스메. 엎어지면 코 닿을 거리에 있기 때문에 뚜벅이로 여행하는 분들에겐 안성맞춤이다. yasadonf

yejener erome 강원 속초 게스트하우스 한옥 후기를 확인하고 최저가 예약 가능한 쿠폰 할인까지 만나보세요. 강원 속초 게스트하우스 한옥 베스트 10 여기어때 특가. 쉼게스트하우스는 2층인데, 올라가는 계단에 포토존이 너무 멋졌어요. 저도 처음엔 단순하게만 생각했다가 몇 번의 시행착오를 겪었는데요. 안녕하세요 잇님들 💜 이번에는 속초에 4박5일 동안 머물렀던 게하를 소개해 드릴려고 하는데요 😆 잇. xfan 뚫기

yandex ed Com › @butterfly_effect1017 › videotiktok. 혼자 또는 친구, 연인과 함께라면 따뜻한 교류와 감성 가득한 숙소가 여행의 퀄리티를 확 높여줄 수 있죠. 그리고 좌식 화장대가 있었는데, 드라이기, 고데기, 멀티탭이 구비되어 있었어요. 쉼 게스트하우스는 주차가 정말 편하다. 가장 가까운 공항은 속초 & 게스트하우스에서 20km 떨어진 양양국제공항입니다. xuxiran3 sotwe

yaco tv 아이돌 서 유하 이제는 속초 게스트하우스 선택의 a부터 z까지, 제가 직접 경험하며 얻은 현실적인 조언과 2025년 최신 트렌드를 바탕으로 완벽한 선택을 돕겠습니다. 속초에 자리한 속초 오투하우스펜션에서는 전용 욕실, 에어컨이 완비된 객실을 이용하실 수 있습니다. 속초 소호259 4인실 후기 ⬇⬇⬇ 속초 게스트하우스 소호259, 속초 워케이션 숙소 추천 워케이션 떠나기 좋은 속초 게스트하우스, 소호259 호스텔 영업시간 & 정보 도미토리 2인실 20,000원 blog. 숙소도 너무 깔끔하고, 방 안에 기본적으로 필요한 게 모두 구비되어 있어서 좋았습니다. 좋아요 41개,🦋나비🦋 @butterfly_effect1017 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 🦋나비🦋여행속초게스트하우스캡컷capcut.

xxaxix_ Com › @butterfly_effect1017 › videotiktok. 체크인 1500 체크아웃 1100 속초 여행을 갔다가 시내에 있는 게스트하우스에 묵게 되었다. 에그게스트하우스는 6베드 도미토리가 제일 저렴하고 보통 동남아권 사람들이 많이 보이는거같다. 이번주에 난생 처음으로 여행 가려고 하는데요. 한국 대규모 게스트하우스 바베큐파티 최대 1000여분의 게스트분들과 진행하는 바베큐+소주 무제한 파티와.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.