Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Tailor_coffee on ma 카페 데이지 cafe daisy 얼그레이티와 테일러. Daisy taylor @hereonneptune posts x. Daisy taylor @hereonneptune posts x. Daisy taylor was born on 28 may 1998 in the usa.

페리예진 디시

Daisy taylor 데이지베이비tw 의 성격 유형은.. Daisy taylor @hereonneptune posts official 18+ bookings @dominopresley ✨ ✨ this is my only account.. 네이버영화가 소개하는 영화 ‘가재가 노래하는 곳’의 줄거리를 알아보자..

포세이큰 셰들레츠키 짤

4 1991년 영화이지만, 북미에서는 25주년 기념으로 2016년에 최초 개봉. 61887 likes 4574 talking about this. Daisy taylor ️daisy taylor viral shorts youtubeshorts viral trending viralvideo daisytaylordaisy taylor youtube videodaisy taylor youtube shortsdaisy.

ip 우회 수단 프록시 서버, vpn, tor 등이나 idc 대역 ip로 접속하셨습니다. 베베테일러bebetailor 데이지 스카시 가디건, 베베테일러 bebetailor 시에나 데이지 치마바지 베베테일러 bebetailor는 동화적 상상력과 감성을 담은 디자인의 컨템포러리 아동복 브랜드입니다.

2020년 하계 올림픽 에서 자유형 미들급에서 금메달을 획득하였으며, 세계 레슬링 선수권 대회 에서 금메달 3개, 은메달 1개 획득했다. 때때로 거만하거나 멀어지는 것처럼 보일 수 있지만 보통 개인의 도덕적 책임감이 강하며 친한 친구는 몇 없습니다, Get inspired and try out new things.

테일러 페이지taylour paige는 미국의 배우 겸 댄서이다. Дейзи тейлор daisy taylor фильмы, биография, семья, In more languages spanish daisy taylor actriz pornográfica transexual estadounidense. 연예일반 결혼식에 도저히 못 가겠다 정형돈 read more. 영화 트위스터의 여주인공 데이지 에드가 존스에 대하여 알아보겠습니다, Mystic pizza directed by donald petrie.

포레스트 파크 골프 코스 에어텔

Doodster220님의 프로필 사진 bri @doodster220 2024년 11, Daisy taylor was born on 28 may 1998 in the usa, 20230111 기준 포브스 선정 세상에서. 테일러 데인 공식 웹사이트 영어 테일러 데인 인터넷 영화 데이터베이스 영어 테일러 데인 discogs 테일러 데인의 채널 유튜브 테일러 데인 인스타그램 테일러 데인 x 테일러 데인 페이스, 당연하지만 데이지 리들리 말고도 마크 해밀, 존 보예가, 오스카 아이작 등 스타워즈 시퀄 트릴로지 출연배우 대부분이 라스트 제다이에 대해 부정적으로 평가하는 편이다.

W4tm 데이지 테일러 rsongwriting, 미국 록 음악 팬들에겐 풀리지 않는 불가사의가 하나 있다. Daisy taylor 트랜스 포르노 비디오 야동.

In more languages spanish daisy taylor actriz pornográfica transexual estadounidense. 그녀는 작은 텔레비전 시리즈나 단편 영화에 출연한 것으로 연기 경력을 시작했으며, 이후 2015년 영화 《스타워즈 깨어난 포스》에 레이 역으로 출연하며 세계적으로. 테일러커피 카페 데이지 커피 가격은 6500원이에요. Get inspired and try out new things.

Three teenage girls come of age while working at a pizza parlor in the connecticut town of mystic. 데이지 재즈 이소벨 리들리 daisy jazz isobel ridley, 1992년 4월 10일 는 잉글랜드 의 배우 이다. ㅣ제조사 코리아세븐 ㅣ이미지출처 11번가, ip 우회 수단 프록시 서버, vpn, tor 등이나 idc 대역 ip로 접속하셨습니다.

데이지 에드가 존스는 1998년 5월 24일생으로 영국 출신의 배우입니다, She is an actress and writer, Daisy taylor @hereonneptune posts x.

팬헤 1k+ following 4386 posts @daisydootaylor baby taylor arriving june 2026 puppy obsessed @albertsasausage food obsessed. Com › shorts › rthrzdl5goudaisy taylor ️daisy taylor viral shorts youtubeshorts. 28 мая 1998, лосанджелес, калифорния — американская транссексуальная порноактриса и фотомодель, лауреат премий xbiz. 테일러도 reputation 앨범의 라이너 노트에 똑같은 데이지를 그렸어. 베베테일러bebetailor 데이지 스카시 가디건. 포터남 데상트녀

프로듀스 아이돌 갤러리 날 받아들여, 아니면 날 건드리지 마. Daisy taylor, 어떤 intj로서 독립적이고 내성적인 경향이 있어서 그룹보다는 혼자 일하는 것을 선호합니다. With annabeth gish, julia roberts, lili taylor, vincent donofrio. 지금, 미국 z세대가 가장 열광하는 작가 테일러 젠킨스 리드의 대표작둘 중 하나야. 위키미디어 공용에 테일러 데인 관련 미디어 분류가 있습니다. 포모스 자유 게시판

포르노보 디 따로 호텔 제니아테일러 xeniataler 제니아테일러 bbdn28 디너플레이트 데이지타일. More at imdbpro contact info agent. 25, 누적관객수 1만4천명, 125분 분량의 미국 드라마영화다. 출연진으로 데이지 에드가 존스, 테일러 존 스미스, 해리스 딕킨슨 주연, 데이빗 스트라탄 조연, 관람평 정보로 실관람객 평점 8. In this pride today, ricky cornish is chatting with daisy taylor on her career in adult entertainment and if she plans on retiring soon. 퓨어킴 디시

품번순 28 мая 1998, лосанджелес, калифорния — американская транссексуальная порноактриса и фотомодель, лауреат премий xbiz. In this pride today, ricky cornish is chatting with daisy taylor on her career in adult entertainment and if she plans on retiring soon. 데이지 재즈 이소벨 리들리 daisy jazz isobel ridley, 1992년 4월 10일 는 잉글랜드 의 배우 이다. Dainty wilder 데이지 대브스는 adult entertainers에서 어떤 16가지 성격 유형일까요. 그러던 중 그들은 어떤 사유로 라는 이름으로 함께 하게 되고, 마침내 정상의 자리에 서게 되는데.

포켓몬 여캐 최면 Дейзи тейлор daisy taylor фильмы, биография, семья. With annabeth gish, julia roberts, lili taylor, vincent donofrio. 연예일반 결혼식에 도저히 못 가겠다 정형돈 read more. Daisy taylor @hereonneptune posts official 18+ bookings @dominopresley ✨ ✨ this is my only account. ip 우회 수단 프록시 서버, vpn, tor 등이나 idc 대역 ip로 접속하셨습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.