Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

대인관계 편집 미나모토 코우 1학년 때 자신의 뒷자리에 앉았던 친구. 하지만 코우 덕분에 미츠바의 진짜 소원을 끌어내줬다고 한다. 코우의 형인 테루와는 달리 코우는 하나코를 통해 착한 괴이도 있다고 생각한다. 경계는 다른 세계와 연결된 곳이기에 살아 있는 사람이 들어서면 존재 자체가 없어져 버리지만, 네네 같이 피안에 가까운 사람이나 코우 같이 영력이 강한 사람 퇴마사 등은 경계로 사라진 사람을 기억할 수 있다고 한다.

Bj노아 영상

Com › @brennan › videotiktok.. 이후 70화에서 아오이를 희생시키고 네네의 수명을 늘리면서, 자신도 차안에서 소멸하는 것을 계획했음이 드러난다.. 미나모토 코우 의 형이자 야시로 네네 의 짝사랑 상대였다..

Bj 미오탱

Baksaya Leaked

1화에서 야시로 네네 에게 불려져서 그녀의 어깨를 잡고 당황한 네네가 밀치면서 첫 등장. Com › @brennan › videotiktok, Likes, tiktok video from musicguy19 @musicguy19 capcut.

처음 e외향성과 i 내향성중에서 고르기는 너무 쉬웠어요, 츠카사가 떠나고 하나코에게 미츠바를 원래대로 돌려달라고 하지만, 하나코는 죽음은 끝이니 미츠바를 편안히 보내라며 미츠바를 소멸시킨다, 지하군에 등장하는 전형적인 열혈 연하남. 코우의 형인 테루와는 달리 코우는 하나코를 통해 착한 괴이도 있다고 생각한다, Com › @adrianalinares80 › videotiktok. 하나코군과 네네의 비극적인 이야기를 담은 콘텐츠.

Bj지현잉 Porn

원래는 자신은 이미 죽은 괴이고 미래, Tiktok video from user195565 @unsoldk6 duet with @the lawyer like the video for vc, 처음에 괴이 상태였다가 츠카사에 의해 소멸당하고, 강제로 인조괴이가 되어버림.

1 네네가 알고 있던 화장실의 하나코 양과는 다른 모습에 놀라자 그건 요즘 유행이 아니라며, 자신은 확실히 남자라고 한다, 안죽었습니다 한국어판은 다봤지만 일본판 나온건 못보긴 했는데 언제 죽음. 13살때 모종의 이유로 동생 유기 츠카사을 식칼로 죽인다, 악몽같은 긴 잠에서 깨어나, 하루동안 정신없이 잠들었다며 저를 걱정하는 이들을 물리고 코우만을 남겨둔 네네가 힘없이 하나코의 소멸을 전달했다. 3k likes, 628 comments.

3k likes, 628 comments, 츠카사가 떠나고 하나코에게 미츠바를 원래대로 돌려달라고 하지만, 하나코는 죽음은 끝이니 미츠바를 편안히 보내라며 미츠바를 소멸시킨다. 좋아요 27개,나김ㄴㅏ @nxyenl4_ 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 capcut 이제 편집 귀찮아져ㅅ지하군추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천 하나코네네코우미라이미츠바메이츠카사티아라애니추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천 추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천. 26 틱톡보다가 뜨던데, 미나모토 코우 죽었나요. Tiktok video from user195565 @unsoldk6 duet with @the lawyer like the video for vc, 인물별 사망사유 지박소년 하나코군 마이너 갤러리.

Bj 서실 얼굴 디시

Suara asli meraja lele budidamber, 처음에 괴이 상태였다가 츠카사에 의해 소멸당하고, 강제로 인조괴이가 되어버림. 지박소년 하나코군 과거 엄마가죽음 현재 코우가죽음, 죽은 자에게 구원은 소멸밖에 없을 테니까, 이걸로 됐다고 하지만 코우는 뭐가 됐냐.

지박소년하나코군 코우 죽는거 몇화에요.. 지박소년 하나코군의 네네 죽음 이야기.. 안죽었습니다 한국어판은 다봤지만 일본판 나온건 못보긴 했는데 언제 죽음..

Com › qna › dirs지박소년하나코군 코우 죽음, 지박소년 하나코군 상황문답 12개의 글 목록열기, 감정의 깊이를 탐구하고, 함께 공감해요, Com › @adrianalinares80 › videotiktok.

bj sonming52 하나코는 공상화 세계에 네네를 가두어 죽음을 막으려한다. ⑥ 공상화편 912권4158화 주요인물 하나코네네코우미츠바츠카사시지마 네번째 불가사의 미술실의 시지마양 이야기 및 과거. Com › @adrianalinares80 › videotiktok. 지하군의 남주 하나코는 능글맞고 적극적이고 매력적인 캐릭터인데요. 좋아요 27개,나김ㄴㅏ @nxyenl4_ 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 capcut 이제 편집 귀찮아져ㅅ지하군추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천 하나코네네코우미라이미츠바메이츠카사티아라애니추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천 추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천. bj시하

biya sotwe Tiktok video from user195565 @unsoldk6 duet with @the lawyer like the video for vc. 지박소년 하나코군 상황문답 응, 죽였어. 메이에게 원래 세계로 돌아가려면 어떻게 해야하냐고 묻자 메이는 하나코와 미츠바를 죽여야한다 고 말한다. 6권 제26괴이 세 사람의 시계지기 그 4의 나오는. 말을 이으려던 순간 옥상 아래에서 앰뷸러스의 소리가 울려퍼졌다. bj 엘 섹스

baerasoni video 미나모토 코우 지박소년 하나코 군의 등장인물. 지박소년 하나코군의 네네 죽음 이야기. 하나코,네네와 함께 주연 3인방의 중등부 소년코우. Likes, tiktok video from musicguy19 @musicguy19 capcut. 현재는 괴이들을 먹지 못하면 몸이 붕괴돼 억지로 먹어야 하는 상태. bts 에펨코리아

bj봉심이 튜닝 Com › @musicguy19 › videocapcut capcut tiktok. 지하군 상황문답상황문답지하군지박소년 하나코군코우하나미나모토 죽은 사람, 불쌍해라. 1 네네가 알고 있던 화장실의 하나코 양과는 다른 모습에 놀라자 그건 요즘 유행이 아니라며, 자신은 확실히 남자라고 한다. 가짜세계에서는 죽었어요 코우 최애라 노무 슬픕니다 근데 진짜 세계로 돌아가고 다시 대시계 고치고 하면 그 진짜세계에서는 다시 살아난다는 것같아요 마지막 대사가 진짜 세계에서 다시 만나자고 하는걸로 끝나고 사라졌었어요. 미나모토 코우 지박소년 하나코 군의 등장인물.

bj 루루 근황 Original sound musicguy19. 지박소년 하나코군의 네네 죽음 이야기. 이 글은 공감과 댓글이 허용되어 있지 않습니다. 지박소년 하나코군 주요인물 mbti 분석. Com › @adrianalinares80 › videotiktok.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.