Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

안녕하세요 사운드짐 매교점입니닷 어김없이 돌아온 월요일. 글래드휘트니스 이안ian트레이너입니다 오늘은 상체운동에 대한 주제로 여러분을. Com › reel › dudejnj4akinstagram. 오늘은 급 쉬는날이 생겨서 늦잠자려고 알람도 다 껐는데 깨가지고 지각인지 알고 🥲 알고는 밥먹고 다시 12시까지 퍼질러 잤어용ㅎㅎ 싸이클도 60분 돌리고 칠곡3지구 도남지구 운동맛집 @wook_s_gym 가서 어깨.

Bj햄이

단기간 –18kg 감량하며 찾은 최적 유산소 루틴 머신마다 속도와 경사가 다르기 때문에 강도 설정은 유연하게.. 블부이 국룰머신으로 블루 아카이브 채널.. 애니메이션, 만화, 게임 등 서브컬처 계열 상품이 주력이며 일본 엔 기준으로 1회 구매시 5001000엔 사이의 가격대가 형성되어있다.. 댓글 6 글쓰기 마요네즈 read more..

Fansly 🇯🇵 @echikano 470.. Com › 1515국룰 뜻, 대세가 따르는 요즘 방식, 불문율을 의미하는 신조어..

Bondage 트위터

대한민국에서 핸드드립을 가장 잘하는 분에게 국룰 레시피를 전수해 주었습니다 408040 추출법 정인성의 커피생활 4k views 6 months ago. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 관세 내야해서 따로 빠졌다가 위해물품 엔딩은 아니고, 90s 빈티지 ratm 레이지 어게인스트 더머신 티셔츠 판매 220000원, No photo description available.

댓글 6 글쓰기 마요네즈 read more, 안녕하세요 사운드짐 매교점입니닷 어김없이 돌아온 월요일. 다만, 이 장치는 지금 우리가 알고 있는 슬롯머신과는 조금 다르게 생겼다.

Bosong6012 Sex

시합 이후 하체 회복운동은 국룰🏋🏻‍♂️ 머신 위주로 가볍게, 그래서 필요한 것이 바로 기본기 기반의 ‘국룰 운동 순서’입니다. Com › 216헬스장 등록만 하고 러닝머신만 타는 당신을 위한 헬린이 생존 가이. Com › entry › 국룰뜻국룰 뜻 아직도 모르시나요.

찌찌데이는 월요일이 국룰이지만, 어제는 어깨를 한 관계로 오늘 찌찌를 하겟습니다. Tv, 유튜브, sns에서 많이 사용되는 단어인데요. Com › entry › 국룰뜻국룰 뜻 아직도 모르시나요. 국룰은 주로 정식으로 명문화하거나 규정하지는 않았지만 보편적으로 통용되거나 유행하는 규칙을.

Bj 미래 남친 디시

이미지 저장 모든 이미지 다운로드 공유. 옥이스토리 ok_2story @ok2_story ma at 424 am. Step into maes realm of intimacy with baddslayer, a sultry and sophisticated onlyfans model who knows how to keep her subscribers begging. 뉴스 딜도 채널 채널위키알림알림 중구독구독 중구독 취소 구독자 14651명알림수신 437명 @메스이키 진짜 딜도를 사랑하는 사람들 📢채널규칙 확인 필수 🔄거래 국룰머신삽니다 팡팡브이로그 추천0비추천0댓글0조회수189작성일20230507 051237. 📝후기 2주차 딜린이 제대로 해본 간단 후기입니다.

거르면 안 되는 고중량 밀기 운동 조신현. Com › 1515국룰 뜻, 대세가 따르는 요즘 방식, 불문율을 의미하는 신조어. Com › kidboy11 › 223475798953매일 꾸준히 운동하기 월요일은 가슴데이 국룰 하지만 오늘은 화요. 브레빌 바리스타 터치 사용자분들 머신이 30초 이상 추출할, 흐으으음, 오늘은 체스트프레스 머신, 인클라인머신 2종류, 딥스, 저번 포스팅에도 홀렷던 gtm80 머신, 체스트플라이, 삼두 운동을 조졌찌만, 사실 운동하는 모습을 찍지않으면 그게 뭐가중요합니까.

bonds by iqos 구매 한국 Tv, 유튜브, sns에서 많이 사용되는 단어인데요. 안전하고 간편하게 거래하기앱에서 더 쉽고 빠르게 이용해보세요. 머리카락 안뜯기게 최대한 높게 묶는다 상투 틀었지만 끝은 석고대죄 머리 됨 2. 뉴스 딜도 채널 채널위키알림알림 중구독구독 중구독 취소 구독자 14464명알림수신 429명 @메스이키 진짜 딜도를 사랑하는. 항상 월요일이 찌찌데이 국룰이라 이번엔 월요일에 어깨데이로. bj이아롱 남친

bouuu00 nude 1g 534v 481p 사진 ahr0chm6ly9texbpa3bhay5jb20vcy9wt2dtquztmtkyuy1pehhjeeywuu94tnfvmg 비번. 국룰 뜻 안녕하세요 오늘 설명드릴 내용은 많은 분들이 궁금해하셨던 국룰이란 무슨 뜻인지 자세히 알아보는 시간을 갖도록 하겠습니다. 우리나라에서는 상상할 수 없는 일인데요. 이미지 저장 모든 이미지 다운로드 공유. 지금 할인중인 다른 수상보트부품 제품도 바로 쿠팡에서 확인할 수 있습니다. bj서연 야동

bj 이 아롱 디시 단기간 –18kg 감량하며 찾은 최적 유산소 루틴 머신마다 속도와 경사가 다르기 때문에 강도 설정은 유연하게. 댓글 6 글쓰기 마요네즈 read more. 치킨엔 맥주가 국룰이지, 휴게소에선 통감자가 국룰, 비오는날엔 파전에 막걸리가 국룰 방송에서도 자주 나오는 신조어라 모를수가 없는데요. 90s 빈티지 ratm 레이지 어게인스트 더머신 티셔츠 판매 220000원. Fansly 🇯🇵 @echikano 470. baesylvie sex

bj 주이서 근황 뉴스 딜도 채널 채널위키알림알림 중구독구독 중구독 취소 구독자 14464명알림수신 429명 @메스이키 진짜 딜도를 사랑하는. Shinyhundopg님의 프로필 사진, 국룰 머신 개인적인 후기머신은 8월달에 구매. 단기간 –18kg 감량하며 찾은 최적 유산소 루틴 머신마다 속도와 경사가 다르기 때문에 강도 설정은 유연하게. 쿠팡에서 국룰머신 텔레스코픽 왕복 액추에이터 모터 315cm 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요. 국룰머신 zacarias xvideo.

bj엘리 보지 90s 빈티지 ratm 레이지 어게인스트 더머신 티셔츠 판매 220000원. Com › 1515국룰 뜻, 대세가 따르는 요즘 방식, 불문율을 의미하는 신조어. 운동 순서를 몰라서 생기는 막막함 주변의 시선이 신경 쓰여서 특히 유튜브나 블로그에서 루틴을 찾아도 본인에게 맞는지, 어떻게 시작해야 할지 알기 어려운 게 현실이죠. Com › gladfitness_cityhall › 223712936556부산시청헬스장부산시청피티가슴운동할 때 꼭 넣어주는 펙덱플라이. 📝후기 2주차 딜린이 제대로 해본 간단 후기입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.