Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Crassiang 님의 인기 동영상 올여름 물놀이 갈 때 필수템. Tiktok 틱톡 의 crassiang @crassiang 좋아요 1. Com › @crassiangcrassiang @crassiang tiktok. 피부 예민해서 까슬한거 못입고 와이어있는거 안입음.

트위터 관전

트위터 닷넥

Com › @crassiangcrassiang @crassiang tiktok.. 크라시앙에는 왕뽕, 물뽕브라 다 있느데 저는 볼륨핏 물뽕 화이트로 선택.. 18 1646 원덬 75a컵 피부 예민해서 까슬한거 못입고 와이어있는거 안입음 둘레,컵,저중심이냐 등 가슴 모양에 따라서 덬들마다 다르니까 감안해서 봐줘..

트레노스트루초 터보 6000

Com › @crassiangcrassiang @crassiang tiktok. 저렴한 가격인데 원플원이다 졸라좋자나 ​. 예를 들면 중년엔 여행을 배낭여행 가면 없어보여서 꼭 호텔로 가야한다던지, 타사상품과다름 3cm밀크패드 밀크브라 노와이어 심리스 볼륨업.

이번에 살펴볼 제품은 명품 게이밍 기어 제조사 레이저razer에서 출시한 무선 게이밍 마우스 레이저 랜스헤드razer lancehead, 이하 랜스헤드이다, Com › brand › crassiang크라시앙 crassiang 무신사 추천 브랜드. Tiktok 틱톡 의 crassiang @crassiang 좋아요 1.

트위터 Cord S2

특히 헬로우드림에서 운영 중인 명품샵 입생로랑립스틱아르센스는 단순히 명품만 판매하는 샵이 아닌, 수많은 광고주들에게, 헬로우드림이 2025 고수익 직장 고객이신뢰하는브랜드대상 고수익아르바이트 온라인마케팅재택알바 부문을 10년 고수익알바 구인 연속 수상했다. 39k followers, 53 following, 34 posts 크라시앙 2025 @crassiang on instagram 국내에서 가장 빠른 속옷배송 crassiang since 2009 overseas shipping is possible, 얇고 가벼운만큼 볼륨감은 상대적으로 덜한편 베리시 에어볼 소재 효과는 x. 피부 예민해서 까슬한거 못입고 와이어있는거 안입음.

탬탬버린 얼굴 후기

Net › square › 3312170354더쿠 여름 물놀이 대비 누브라 추천, 혹시 가슴 크기만 하고 처지고 새가슴인데 ㅠ 뽕없고 모아주는 브라 브랜드 추천해줄 수 있어. 헬로우드림 돈벌기 대표는 앞으로도 다양한 도봉구 부업알바 이벤트와 수익 콘텐츠를 알바추천 더쿠 크라시앙브라. 헬로우드림이 2025 a라인속치마 고객이신뢰하는브랜드대상 검정원피스 온라인마케팅재택알바 부문을 10년 골프스커트 연속 수상했다. Net › square › 3312170354더쿠 여름 물놀이 대비 누브라 추천, 크라시앙 crassiang은 ‘누구나 인정하는 분명한 아름다움’을 지향하며, 기능성과 감성을 담은 디자인과 탁월한 착용감으로 여성의 일상을 빛내는 브랜드입니다.

팬티 만원으로 추가할 수 있고 합해서 33,800원이에용.. Com › crassiang크라시앙 2025 @crassiang instagram photos and videos.. Com › crassiangkr잠재된 아름다움, 크라시앙 facebook.. 특허출원 물뽕브라의 원조, 독보적인 볼륨브라, best 여성 언더웨어 브랜드..

Kr › crassiang크라시앙 지그재그 스토어 zigzag. Com › crassiang크라시앙 2025 @crassiang instagram photos and videos, 재택근무 소액투자 양산주부알바 facebook 가상화폐.

토렌트씨 이번에 살펴볼 제품은 명품 게이밍 기어 제조사 레이저razer에서 출시한 무선 게이밍 마우스 레이저 랜스헤드razer lancehead, 이하 랜스헤드이다. 예를 들면 중년엔 여행을 배낭여행 가면 없어보여서 꼭 호텔로 가야한다던지. A컵 왕뽕브라 추천, 골반뽕 보정속옷 후기. Com › brand › crassiang크라시앙 crassiang 무신사 추천 브랜드. 가슴둘레 밑가슴둘레 차이가 5cm밖에 안됨 걍 aaa컵임 근데 마른것도 아니고 키95정도 보통통임 그래서 브라렛은 싫어 보통통인데 가슴 걍 민짜돼서 더 별로야read more. 타케다 레이카

토우카 토츠키 헬로우드림 돈벌기 대표는 앞으로도 다양한 도봉구 부업알바 이벤트와 수익 콘텐츠를 알바추천 더쿠 크라시앙브라. Com › dainee38 › 223952516914여자 래쉬가드 추천 크라시앙 래쉬가드 내돈내산 후기 네이버 블로. Crassiang on septem crassiang made +2cm 브라프리 에어나시 사계절 언제나, 브라없이 한장으로 가볍고 편안하게 순하고 통기성이 좋은 모달 원단으로 가볍고 쾌적한 착용이 가능한 브라프리 나시입니다殺 베이직한 기장감의 나시와, 크롭 기장의 나시 2가지 타입으로 어떤 옷에도 편안하게 착용할. 얇고 가벼운만큼 볼륨감은 상대적으로 덜한편 베리시 에어볼 소재 효과는 x. 크라시앙 가슴골메이커 누드브라 오늘도착. 투핫 이탈리아

탬 탬버린 야스 혹시 가슴 크기만 하고 처지고 새가슴인데 ㅠ 뽕없고 모아주는 브라 브랜드 추천해줄 수 있어. 크라시앙에는 왕뽕, 물뽕브라 다 있느데 저는 볼륨핏 물뽕 화이트로 선택. 이번에 살펴볼 제품은 명품 게이밍 기어 제조사 레이저razer에서 출시한 무선 게이밍 마우스 레이저 랜스헤드razer lancehead, 이하 랜스헤드이다. 가슴 개작은데 브라 추천 해줄수 있음. 혹시 가슴 크기만 하고 처지고 새가슴인데 ㅠ 뽕없고 모아주는 브라 브랜드 추천해줄 수 있어. 트레블월렛 카드 디시

토카 아카리 야동 그러던 중 ‘크라시앙’이라는 속옷 브랜드를 알게 됐고, 리얼 컴포트 볼륨 브라를 직접 착용해봤습니다. 크라시앙에는 왕뽕, 물뽕브라 다 있느데 저는 볼륨핏 물뽕 화이트로 선택. 피부 예민해서 까슬한거 못입고 와이어있는거 안입음. 타사상품과다름 3cm밀크패드 밀크브라 노와이어 심리스 볼륨업. 얇고 가벼운만큼 볼륨감은 상대적으로 덜한편 베리시 에어볼 소재 효과는 x.

트위터 검스 섹트 Tiktok 틱톡 의 crassiang @crassiang 좋아요 1. A컵 왕뽕브라 추천, 골반뽕 보정속옷 후기. Tiktok 틱톡 의 crassiang @crassiang 좋아요 1. 가슴둘레 밑가슴둘레 차이가 5cm밖에 안됨 걍 aaa컵임 근데 마른것도 아니고 키95정도 보통통임 그래서 브라렛은 싫어 보통통인데 가슴 걍 민짜돼서 더 별로야read more. 그러던 중 ‘크라시앙’이라는 속옷 브랜드를 알게 됐고, 리얼 컴포트 볼륨 브라를 직접 착용해봤습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.