Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

6k followers, 2995 following, 824 posts. 22k followers, 2,506 following, 771 posts 남자눈썹문신 두피문신 헤어라인문신 남자헤어라인 홍대눈썹문신 홍대두피문신 smp 잔흔제거 문래화실 @mullae_hwasil on instagram 𝐌𝐔𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐄 𝐇𝐖𝐀𝐒𝐈𝐋 남자눈썹문신 헤어라인문신 두피문신 𝐍𝐨. 100% 만족 4 성북구내게 어울리는 눈썹 모양과 정리 후 그리기까지 눈썹완전정복 원데이 클래스. 남자눈썹문신 두피문신 헤어라인문신 threads.

이 안기둥 면에는 12지신상十二支神像을 돋을새김으로 조각하였다.. 반영구라서 한번 받으면 짧게는 1년 길게는 3년 이상도 남아있는데 왜 타인에게 그 중요한 결정을 맡기시나요.. 1 ⠀ 미대출신 원장의 증명된 2만건 이상의 시술과 수백개의 후기 ⠀ ▫️눈썹▫️헤어라인 ▫ 잔흔제거 ▫️두피.. Com › plan_x_projectseoul microblading 합정눈썹문신 합정속눈썹펌 @plan_x_project..

Eune 디시

Erome 여캠

382 likes, 5 comments mullae_hwasil on novem 구렛나루 길이연장 + 옆머리 숱채움 디자인 짧은 구렛나루로 인하여 항상 옆머리로 구렛나루를 덮고 다녔던 고객님. 20k followers, 1,834 following, 637 posts see instagram photos and videos from 남자눈썹문신 남자눈썹 헤어라인문신 두피문신 smp 잔흔제거 반영구수강 반영구학원 문래화실 @mullae_hwasil. 고객님의 이목구비 및 골격의 장점을 최대한 부각시킬 수 있도록 황금비율의 바버라인 헤어라인 디자인으로의 수정과 눈썹 길이연장 및 각도수정 디자인으로 한번에 인상 탈바꿈 시술 진행해 드렸습니다, Com › plan_x_projectseoul microblading 합정눈썹문신 합정속눈썹펌 @plan_x_project. 119 likes, 2 comments mullae_hwasil on 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑔 👉🏽후기로 증명하는 문래화실, 알 💅🏻뷰티 인플루언서💕 문래동눈썹문신 문래동두피문신 문래동속눈썹 문래동네일 문래동미용실 문래동붙임머리 협업.

전 후 차이가 확실한 문래화실의 성형급 시술. 구렛나루나 헤어라인은 모두 같은 의미를 가지고 있습니다. Mullae hwasil 남자눈썹문신 헤어라인문신 두피문신 no. 1 ⠀ 미대출신 원장의 증명된 2만건 이상의 시술과 수백개의 후기 ⠀ ▫️눈썹▫️헤어라인 ▫ 잔흔제거 ▫️두피, 미대출신 원장의 정교함과 섬세한 디자인 작업, 황금비율로 맞춘 눈썹.

Di 한거

6k followers, 2995 following, 824 posts. 🥇훈남도 존잘이 되어가는 문래화실 단순한 눈썹문신. 329 likes, 7 comments mullae_hwasil on janu 磊남자눈썹문신 퐍퐎. Com › mullae_hwasil › reels남자눈썹문신 두피문신 헤어라인문신 남자헤어라인 홍대눈썹문신 홍대. 남편이 눈썹문신을 하게되어 가까운 곳 위주로 찾게된 눈썹맛집인 플랜엑스 라는 곳인데요.

Ero Me Bocil

리터치부터 여자 눈썹문신 종류 기간 후관리까지 네이버 블로그 뷰티 정보 174개의 글 목록열기.. Likes, 0 comments mullae_hwasil on septem 𝑀𝐸𝑁’𝑆 𝐻𝐴𝐼𝑅𝐿𝐼𝑁𝐸 𝐴𝑁𝐷 𝐸𝑌𝐸𝐵𝑅𝑂𝑊 ️9월 10월 신규예약 진행중 입니다 ️ ️눈썹, 헤어라인 반영구 ️smp 두피문신 ️잔흔제거 _____________________________________⠀ 소개에 소개로..

Duphalac Enema 방법

Likes, 1 comments mullae_hwasil on janu 푀퐸푁푆 퐺푅푂푂푀퐼푁퐺 푤푖푡ℎ 푚푢푙푙푎푒 ℎ푤푎푠푖푙 1월. ⠀ hairline 문래화실의 헤어라인 시술은 머릿결의 방향과 일치하게 시술하며 레이어드 기법으로 더욱 더 밀도있고 자연스러운 잔머리로 보여지도록 연출, Com › heeppeu › 223944339411문래눈썹문신 남자눈썹 당일부터 자연스러운 비결은 네이버 블로그.

⠀ ️성별,성함 ️연락처 ️. 고객님의 이목구비 및 골격의 장점을 최대한 부각시킬 수 있도록 황금비율의 바버라인 헤어라인 디자인으로의 수정과 눈썹 길이연장 및 각도수정 디자인으로 한번에 인상 탈바꿈 시술 진행해 드렸습니다. 미대&경영대 졸업생들의 인체드로잉을 활용한 반영구드로잉 클래스.

문래화실은 남성분들의 눈썹을 균일한 밀도로 똑같은 색감으로 보이게 시술하기보단 강약 조절을 통하여 더욱 더 자연스럽고 실제 눈썹에 가깝게 보이도록 시술해 드리고, 종로남자눈썹문신 비용 알면 혹하게 되죠 네이버 블로그 남자눈썹 41개의 글 목록열기. ✓미대출신 원장의 황금비율에 맞춘 디자인과 정교한 시술 작업.

erome 반응 Likes, 1 comments mullae_hwasil on janu 푀퐸푁푆 퐺푅푂푂푀퐼푁퐺 푤푖푡ℎ 푚푢푙푙푎푒 ℎ푤푎푠푖푙 1월. ⠀ hairline 문래화실의 헤어라인 시술은 머릿결의 방향과 일치하게 시술하며 레이어드 기법으로 더욱 더 밀도있고 자연스러운 잔머리로 보여지도록 연출. 1 ⠀ 🥇미대출신 원장의 증명된 2만건 이상의 시술과 수백개의 후기 ⠀ ️눈썹 ️헤어라인 잔흔제거 ️두피문신𝐒𝐌𝐏🔝@mullae_hwasil_scalp ⠀ ⇩시술 수강문의 ‘카카오채널’⇩ 22. Likes, 2 comments mullae_hwasil on octo 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑔 👉🏽후기로 증명하는 문래화실. 남자 눈썹, 헤어라인 깔끔함의 정석 두피문신 남자헤어라인. di한거 웹툰

deli_bean x 눈썹문신 두피문신 헤어라인문신 남자헤어라인 홍대눈썹문신 홍대두피문신 smp 잔흔제거 문래화실 @mullae_hwasil on instagram mullae. 눈썹문신 두피문신 헤어라인문신 남자헤어라인 홍대눈썹문신 홍대두피문신 smp 잔흔제거 문래화실 @mullae_hwasil on instagram mullae. 블로그 소소한이야기 558개의 글 목록열기. Likes, 1 comments mullae_hwasil on ma 𝑀𝐸𝑁𝑆 𝐺𝑅𝑂𝑂𝑀𝐼𝑁𝐺 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑒 ℎ𝑤𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑙 ⠀ 💈헤어라인+눈썹💈 동시 시술하신 고객님, 선명하고 깔끔한 인상을. ️프로필 상단 링크 카카오채널 문래화실 ⠀ ▫️. e.hant

donottrythisath twitter 눈썹돌을 얹어 봉분 아랫단을 보호하고 있다. Com › mgallery › board눈썹문신 문래화실 여기서 시술 받아본 사람 있음. Likes, 1 comments mullae_hwasil on ap 𝑀𝐸𝑁𝑆 𝐺𝑅𝑂𝑂𝑀𝐼𝑁𝐺 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑒 ℎ𝑤𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑙 ⠀ 💈헤어라인+눈썹 💈동시 시술하신 고객님, 눈썹은. 시술 직후와 평소에도 자연스러움을 추구하셔서 기존 모발과 눈썹에 맞추어 톤연결 맞춤디자인 시술 진행해 드렸습니다. 1,290 likes, 37 comments mullae_hwasil on j 𝑀𝐸𝑁’𝑆 𝐻𝐴𝐼𝑅𝐿𝐼𝑁𝐸 𝐴𝑁𝐷 𝐸𝑌𝐸𝐵𝑅𝑂𝑊 🏆미대출신 원장의 정교함과 섬세한 디자인 작업, 황금비율로 맞춘 눈썹시술로 얼굴의 이미지를 훈남으로 바꿔드립니다. erome 여잼

erome 미시 알 💅🏻뷰티 인플루언서💕 문래동눈썹문신 문래동두피문신 문래동속눈썹 문래동네일 문래동미용실 문래동붙임머리 협업. 알 💅🏻뷰티 인플루언서💕 문래동눈썹문신 문래동두피문신 문래동속눈썹 문래동네일 문래동미용실 문래동붙임머리 협업. 문래화실은 남성분들의 눈썹을 균일한 밀도로. 𝐒𝐈𝐌𝐔𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐒𝐊𝐄𝐓𝐂𝐇➖ 남자눈썹 헤어라인 두피문신. 6,693 followers, 1,599 following, 586 posts 르손수 잔흔을 남기지 않는 수원눈썹 문래화실 @mullae_hwasil on instagram mullae.

dvmm00286 이 사진은 인스타 문래화실에서 퍼 왔습니다. Likes, 0 comments mullae_hwasil on septem 𝑀𝐸𝑁’𝑆 𝐻𝐴𝐼𝑅𝐿𝐼𝑁𝐸 𝐴𝑁𝐷 𝐸𝑌𝐸𝐵𝑅𝑂𝑊 ️9월 10월 신규예약 진행중 입니다 ️ ️눈썹, 헤어라인 반영구 ️smp 두피문신 ️잔흔제거 _____________________________________⠀ 소개에 소개로. 119 likes, 2 comments mullae_hwasil on 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑔 👉🏽후기로 증명하는 문래화실. 기존 또렷하지 않아 보였던 이목구비에서 ️헤어라인+ ️눈썹 시술로 훈남으로 변신하신 고객님. ✓미대출신 원장의 황금비율에 맞춘 디자인과 정교한 시술 작업.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.