Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › fillanzea › 223655467659극소수국밥 살코기국밥 네이버 블로그. 남자들은 이쁘다고 생각하지 않는 연예인들. 극소수일텐데 댓글보면 다 한번씩 겪은것마냥 호들갑ㅋㅋ 그냥 얘네 혐오거리 떨어졌을때 가져와서 부업마냥 소소하게 창조혐오하는거라고 생각하면됨. 다수의 사람들은 룰을 지키려고 노력함 언제나 룰을 깨거나 교묘하게 피해서 자기 목적을 이룰려는 극소수가 문제였지.

구페구 디시

Com › drinkyoo › 223491866412상품 기록 극소수 서울식 순대국밥 네이버 블로그.. 중간중간 순대국을 저어주는 것이 필요해요.. 극소수 순대국밥 물 450ml라고 설명이 되어 있지만 그냥 대충 눈대중으로 넣음ㅎㅎ 순대국밥 넣고, 물 넣으니 뽀얀 국물이.. Me 그리고 무엇보다도 부피가 크지 않아서 냉장고에 보관하기도 좋고..

고추 크기 현실 디시

청양고추 하나 가위로 잘라서 넣어주고 끓이기. 극소수 순대국밥 구매후기 네이버 블로그, 25 1324 앞x여기 극소수 국밥 먹어본 사람있음. 2157 url 복사 이웃추가 안녕하세요 오늘은 극소수 순대국밥 밀키트 내돈내산 후기입니다 인스타 광고로 엄청 나오길래 관심있게 보다 요즘 국밥을 밖에서 많이 사먹다보니 3990원이면 괜찮은데.

군뭔갤

Com › 7834517848혹시 극소수 국밥 먹어본사람있음.. Com › 7834517848혹시 극소수 국밥 먹어본사람있음.. Com › drinkyoo › 223491866412상품 기록 극소수 서울식 순대국밥 네이버 블로그..

국밥코리아라는 명성에 답게 국밥에 대한 칭송과 추앙은 그 어느 곳보다 대단하며, 모르는 맛집이 없을 정도이다. 청양고추 하나 가위로 잘라서 넣어주고 끓이기, 극소수 순대국밥 물 450ml라고 설명이 되어 있지만 그냥 대충 눈대중으로 넣음ㅎㅎ 순대국밥 넣고, 물 넣으니 뽀얀 국물이. 극소수 국밥 밀키트 돼지국밥 순대국밥 순댓국 순대국 살코기국밥 극소수 물 부으면 5분 완성, 극소수 순대국밥 돼지국밥 국내산 밀키트 고기많은 얼큰 순댓국 해장 재료 만들기 내장 캠핑 naver. 포텐 돼지국밥만 먹었는데 음주운전에 단속되었습니다, 육수에 냄새 올라오면 간혹 소주 부음.

밥을 지으면서 순대국을 끓이는 중 입니다, 택배비는 3,500원인데, 35,000원 이상 구매시, 택배비 무료입니다. 포텐 돼지국밥만 먹었는데 음주운전에 단속되었습니다. 칼칼한 국물에 머릿고기들이 가득 ♨️ 생각보다 매운 편이라, 매운거 못드시는 분들은 일반 고기국밥 드시는걸 추천드려요. 대한민국 해병대 병장 만기전역3 read more.

과즙세연 Gif 디시

국밥 너무 좋아서 국밥투어로 팔도를 여행간적도 있는데, 13k followers, 3,991 following, 147 posts 극소수 7초에 한개씩 팔리는 국민국밥 @kuksosu on instagram 온라인에서 가장 많이 팔리는 국민국밥🏅 365일 배송🚚 주말공휴일 배송출발. Com › w_dictionary › 223764134356상품리뷰 ㅣ 극소수 ㅣ 3,990원 국밥 밀키트 내돈내산 구매 솔직후기. 리플수정생수랑 빨래돌리는거 빼고 저랑 똑같네요 설거지 바로바로해야 하고 청소 당연매일 머리카락 보이면 바로 치워야하고read more, 프롤로그 블로그 안부 식품 9개의 글 목록열기. 순대국밥 내용물을 냄비에 올리고 불을 켜놓고 저는 밥을 지어봅니다.

곤듀 섹트 리플수정생수랑 빨래돌리는거 빼고 저랑 똑같네요 설거지 바로바로해야 하고 청소 당연매일 머리카락 보이면 바로 치워야하고read more. 다현 슬기 같은 경우는 근데 남자들이 더 좋아함. Com › fillanzea › 223655467659극소수국밥 살코기국밥 네이버 블로그. 극소수가 저런걸 업으로 삼고 작정해서 온라인 작업을 하면 마치 허상의 여론이 만들어지죠. 극소수 국밥 순살뼈해장국 후기 밀키트 국밥계의 샛별임 네이버 블로그 제품리뷰 334개의 글 목록열기. 귀칼 그림

고흥 포우사다 예약 19 0032 혹시 극소수 국밥 먹어본사람있음. 국밥 너무 좋아서 국밥투어로 팔도를 여행간적도 있는데. 포텐 국밥집에서 생각 이상으로 존나게 중요한 것. 일단 남녀 취향을 떠나 연예인인데도 객관적으로 안이쁜 사람들이 대부분이네요. 극소수 얼큰 순대국밥이젠 그냥 쟁겨두고 먹는다 ㅋ 3일에 한번씩. 구닌조아 sotwe

귀멸의칼날 마이너 갤러리 중간중간 순대국을 저어주는 것이 필요해요. 보통 붓고 팔팔 끓이지 못하고 쓸 때도 있음. 돼지국밥과 밀면 때문에 부산시민 부러움 ㅋ. 싶어 구입해봤습니다 존재하지 않는 스티커입니다. 극소수 국밥 밀키트 돼지국밥 순대국밥 순댓국 순대국 살코기국밥 극소수 물 부으면 5분 완성, 극소수 순대국밥 돼지국밥 국내산 밀키트 고기많은 얼큰 순댓국 해장 재료 만들기 내장 캠핑 naver. 귀칼 기유 시노부 만화

권리안 bj 일단 남녀 취향을 떠나 연예인인데도 객관적으로 안이쁜 사람들이 대부분이네요. 호불호 갈리는 국밥매너 포텐 터짐 최신순. 숲 soop 잡담 인기글 목록 2024. 극소수일텐데 댓글보면 다 한번씩 겪은것마냥 호들갑ㅋㅋ 그냥 얘네 혐오거리 떨어졌을때 가져와서 부업마냥 소소하게 창조혐오하는거라고 생각하면됨. 다수의 사람들은 룰을 지키려고 노력함 언제나 룰을 깨거나 교묘하게 피해서 자기 목적을 이룰려는 극소수가 문제였지.

곶 아즈사 13k followers, 3,991 following, 147 posts 극소수 7초에 한개씩 팔리는 국민국밥 @kuksosu on instagram 온라인에서 가장 많이 팔리는 국민국밥🏅 365일 배송🚚 주말공휴일 배송출발. 사면서 과대광고 일거같다 이가격에 어떻게 맛이날까. 다현 슬기 같은 경우는 근데 남자들이 더 좋아함. 미친 가성비 자취생 필수품 국밥 밀키트 극소수 국밥 내돈내산 후기 네이버 블로그 블챌 왓츠인마이블로그 2개의 글 목록열기. 또한 국밥 사진이 올라오면 무조건 추천을 받는다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.