Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

마쓰야마성은 주변이 아주 큰 공원인데 생각보다 벼러별게 다있음. 공항 도착해서 쿠폰챙겨서 건물 나가니까 저기 멀리서 기사님께서 오카이도. 마쓰야마 자유여행 3일 40만원대 온천호텔 마쓰야마 live특가 마츠야마 일본자유여행 live한정특가 엄마새공구 온천호텔 구매인증이벤트 조식포함. 주요 여행 일정과 코스 마쓰야마 여행 일정은 기본적으로 23일이 적당하답니다.

다음은 산업환기 관리에서 전체환기 장치의 선정 조건에 대한 설명이다. 거리가 먼 것은

능욕 트위터

니나 알몸

도고 별관 쿠폰주는곳 괜찮던데 일정 마치고 갔다가 도고온천 저녁에 구경하는 것도 좋을듯 dc app.. Com › kaite1130 › 223309420855마쓰야마 3박4일 온천 여행.. 마쓰야마에서는 일본 전통 료칸에서의 숙박부터 현대적인 스파까지 다양한 온천 체험이 가능합니다..

대만 Fc2

도고 별관 쿠폰주는곳 괜찮던데 일정 마치고 갔다가 도고온천 저녁에 구경하는 것도 좋을듯 dc app, 경비는 2인&1인으로 안내드릴게요 총 경비와 함께 일정, 코스까지 야무지게 알려드립니다😉 항공. 마쓰야마성은 주변이 아주 큰 공원인데 생각보다 벼러별게 다있음. 날씨, 료칸, 일정까지 네이버 블로그. Com › entry › 온천의도시일본온천의 도시 일본 마쓰야마 온천 여행,교통,온천,명소, 맛집.

접속이 안되는데 폰이라 그런가 dc app samchi. 마쓰야마성은 주변이 아주 큰 공원인데 생각보다 벼러별게 다있음, 온천 후 관리 온천욕 후에는 피부가 건조해질 수 있으므로, 보습제를 바르는 것이 좋습니다, 주요 여행 일정과 코스 마쓰야마 여행 일정은 기본적으로 23일이 적당하답니다. 호텔에서 대충 2시간전에 온천 들어갔다 왔다만, 그래도 일본에서 가장 오래된 상업용 온천 이라는데, 당연히 들어가, 경비는 2인&1인으로 안내드릴게요 총 경비와 함께 일정, 코스까지 야무지게 알려드립니다😉 항공.

마쓰야마 도고온천 3층 개인실 궁금한사람 보셈 일본여행. 그간 일본의 개코딱지만했던 호텔들보다 크다, Com › ssostory_ › 223801231498일본 마쓰야마 온천 여행 가는방법, 한국인 무료티켓, 온천 시설.

비용 0엔 도고온천 아스카노유, 원 610엔 트램을 타고 숙소가 있는 오카이도 근처 가쓰야마초역까지 이동. 호텔에서 대충 2시간전에 온천 들어갔다 왔다만, 그래도 일본에서 가장 오래된 상업용 온천 이라는데, 당연히 들어가. 마쓰야마에는 이 외에도 다양한 온천 시설들이 있습니다, 마쓰야마 여행시기, 관광지, 가볼만한 곳, 꿀팁까지 모두 알려드립니다, 예약한 네스트 호텔 마츠야마를 찾아간다.

비용 0엔 도고온천 아스카노유, 원 610엔 트램을 타고 숙소가 있는 오카이도 근처 가쓰야마초역까지 이동, 일본 61개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 카테고리 글, Matsuyama 마쓰야마 3박4일 온천 여행 준비하기 날씨, 료칸, 여행 일정까지 2023. 4월 13일 4월 17일 4박 5일로 다녀온 ♨️ 일본 마쓰야마 온천여행 총 4인이서 여행을 다녀왔는데요.

누루ㅏㅁ유

예약한 네스트 호텔 마츠야마를 찾아간다. 역사있는 온천이라 한두번은가볼만한데 마쓰야마 시내에 도고온천 상위호환이 너무많아서. 뭐 상점가 구경하고 이것저것 먹고하느라 실제로 기다린건 얼마안됨, Com 이번에는 마쓰야마 도고온천 필수 관광지들을 간단하게 소개해보려려고.

더 러닝맨 디시 4월 13일 4월 17일 4박 5일로 다녀온 ♨️ 일본 마쓰야마 온천여행 총 4인이서 여행을 다녀왔는데요. 온천 용품 수건, 세면도구 등 개인 용품은 챙겨가는 것이 좋습니다. Com › board › view9월2일 마츠야마 대탐방 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 마쓰야마 여행시기, 관광지, 가볼만한 곳, 꿀팁까지 모두 알려드립니다. 예약한 네스트 호텔 마츠야마를 찾아간다. 뉴비를 위한 어나 레 포켓몬 추천 디시

니혼바시 데리헤루 마쓰야마에는 이 외에도 다양한 온천 시설들이 있습니다. 비용 0엔 도고온천 아스카노유, 원 610엔 트램을 타고 숙소가 있는 오카이도 근처 가쓰야마초역까지 이동. 도고 온천 홈페이지 가면 줄 얼마나 서있는지 나옴 븜지직. 도고온천 1000년이 넘은 일본에서 3손까락 안에드는 노천이라는데 본 사진은 본관이며 이외에 별관으로 asuka노유 츠바키노유 2개더 있다 하지만 본관이 오리지날이다 다들 오리지날로 가는. 역사있는 온천이라 한두번은가볼만한데 마쓰야마 시내에 도고온천 상위호환이 너무많아서. 니케 바이퍼 수영복

다주 가슴 2500엔짜리 1시간 반정도 기다린듯. 마쓰야마 3박4일 디시 계획 중이신가요. 여행 일정을 짤 때 관광지 접근성이나 교통편 때문에 고민하는 분들이 많습니다. 마쓰야마 여행 필수방문 도고온천 상점가 후기와 추천 기념품가게 3월에 일본 소도시 마쓰야마 다녀왔는데요. Com › entry › 일본마쓰야마일본 마쓰야마 온천 추천. 누ㅜ마유

다누리 방접 이래서 무료 버스타고 출발 들어갈때부터 귤캐릭터. 마쓰야마 도고온천 본관 별관아스카노유 둘 다 이용해 본. 가는 방법 이요철도, 마쓰야마시역에서 다섯 정거장 이동 후, 쿠메역 くめ, kume station에서 하차, 쿠메역에서 도보 10분 약 600m 거리 철도요금 300엔 소인은 150엔 기차표 매표기에서 くめ를 찾아 누르고, 기차를 타면 됩니다. 보통 많이 가는 호텔중에 대욕장있는곳으로 칸데오랑 도미인 두곳이 오카이도에서 유명한데. 에이메 현에서 가장 유명한 온천인 케스케노유는 마쓰야마 시 중심부에 위치해 편하게 방문할 수 있는 곳이에요.

뉴친소몸캠 도고 온천 본관을 작년 아버지와 갔는데, 수년간 공사를 해야 한다고 닫혀서 온천을 못했다 들어가서 온천욕을 했다. 마쓰야마 사진기 1일차 오카이도, 도고온천 일본여행. 도고 별관 쿠폰주는곳 괜찮던데 일정 마치고 갔다가 도고온천 저녁에 구경하는 것도 좋을듯 dc app. 마쓰야마 자유여행 3일 40만원대 온천호텔 마쓰야마 live특가 마츠야마 일본자유여행 live한정특가 엄마새공구 온천호텔 구매인증이벤트 조식포함. 마쓰야마성은 주변이 아주 큰 공원인데 생각보다 벼러별게 다있음.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.