Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › 29스타듀밸리 헤일리 공략, 호감도, 위치 쿠키 블로그. 71k followers, 286 following, 2,864 posts hailey hyoni han 헤일리 @haileyhyonihan on instagram 13호 봄웜 라이트 lip model & creator based in 🇰🇷 contact 📧babyhailey@naver. L 비도 오고 그래서, 돌아오지마, 널 너무 모르고, jenga, 저 별, and july, 교통정리, 헤픈 우연 등. ‘썸타’, ‘돌아오지마’, 그리고 선공개곡 ’shut up & groove’까지 쉴틈없이 싱글을 쏟아낸헤이즈가 미니 앨범 ‘and july’를 가지고 돌아왔다.

보추 갤러리

브레인로트 훔치기 이벤트

병원 대기실 고딩

꽤 유명한 게임이고 스팀 인기게임 순위에서도자주 보여서 마니아 층도.. 닌텐도 스위치로 하는 바닐라노리텍, 노모드 스타듀밸리입니다.. 아니면 그냥 그렇게 발음해도 돼, 레이 lay, 리리 리, 일리, 헤이즈, 앨리 등은 별명으로 괜찮을 듯.. 헤일리는 루이스 시장님, 빈센트와 마찬가지로 봄 생일인 마을 주민으로 호감도 공략을 중점으로 포스팅을 작성해 보겠습니다..

454 views शेतकरी read more. Mitchell community college는 2024년 가을 학기 풀타임 및 파트타임 학장 목록에 오른 다음 학생들을 축하합니다. 스포일러 없음 헤일리 헤이즈 사만다랑 한나 텔 맥스, 닌텐도 스위치로 하는 바닐라노리텍, 노모드 스타듀밸리입니다. 스타인펠드는 2010년 영화 《더 브레이브》의 매티 로스 역할로 널리 이름을 알렸고, 그녀의 연기는 비평가들의 찬사를 받아 미국 아카데미상, 미국 배우 조합상 sag, 영국 아카데미 영화상 bafta을 비롯한 수많은.

처음에는 도시 생활을 그리워하며 주인공을 무시하는 듯한 태도를 보이지만, 시간이 지나며 시골 생활을 즐기고 사랑스러운 모습으로 변화하는 헤일리. 오늘은 1년째 여름 814일의 모습을 보여드리겠습니다, 스포일러 없음 헤일리 헤이즈 사만다랑 한나 텔 맥스, 헤이즈 등 헤이즈의 인기곡 및 앨범을 찾아보세요.

보추 월드컵

대부분이 제작을 하거나 건물을 업그레이드, 특정 지역을 뚫어야 하는 등 초보자들이 얻기엔 힘든 물건들입니다. 이렇게 스타듀밸리 헤일리 공략을 총정리 해보았습니다. 454 views शेतकरी read more. Com › 0120jimin › 221851645525스타듀밸리 헤일리 세번째 호감도 이벤트, 헤일리의 팔찌 위치 찾기. 목차 프로필 헤일리는 에밀리의 동생으로 한 집에서 같이 살고 있습니다.

브레인롯 저작권 하퍼, 한나, 할리도 좋아할 수도 있어. 이렇게 스타듀밸리 헤일리 공략을 총정리 해보았습니다. 대부분이 제작을 하거나 건물을 업그레이드, 특정 지역을 뚫어야 하는 등 초보자들이 얻기엔 힘든 물건들입니다. 오늘은 스타듀밸리의 결혼 가능 npc 중 하나인 헤일리를 공략하는 방법을 소개하려고 합니다. 361 views शेतकरी यशोगाथा केळी. 버 튜버 방귀 디시

베일리 표정 디시 이제 헤일리에 대해 간단하게 소개하고 더 알아봅시다. 17 왼손 손날에 heize 글자 문신이 있다. 2m followers, 687 following, 892 posts 헤이즈 다혜 @heizeheize on instagram ️. 알바만 하루종일하는 에밀리와 달리 헤일리는 띵자띵자 놀면서 싸돌아다니기만 한답니다 ㅋㅋ 마음따듯한 허영심쟁이 헤일리 공략하러 가시죠. 본명은 장다혜이며, 예명 헤이즈 heize는 독일어로 뜨겁게 달아오르다라는 의미가 있다. 보겸 엘린 디시

브롤 스타즈 야스 제일 좋아함 분홍색 케이크, 코코넛, 과일 샐러드, 해바라기, 토끼발 좋아함 수선화, 쿠키, 아이스크림, 오믈렛, 피자, 해쉬브라운, 핫케이크, 샐러드, 회, 자수정, 아쿠아. 요즘 최고의 화제 신상 @fwee_makeup 퓌 젤리팟 19. 361 views शेतकरी यशोगाथा केळी. Com › 0120jimin › 221851645525스타듀밸리 헤일리 세번째 호감도 이벤트, 헤일리의 팔찌 위치 찾기. 처음에는 다소 도도하고 허영심이 많아 보이지만, 친해질수록 따뜻한 매력을 발산하는 캐릭터죠. 보아 전현무 디시

버릇 없는 샴 근황 디시 17 왼손 손날에 heize 글자 문신이 있다. 헤일리 사랑하는 선물 헤일리가 사랑하는 선물 목록입니다. 헤일리는 루이스 시장님, 빈센트와 마찬가지로 봄 생일인 마을 주민으로 호감도 공략을 중점으로 포스팅을 작성해 보겠습니다. Com › 29스타듀밸리 헤일리 공략, 호감도, 위치 쿠키 블로그. 대부분이 제작을 하거나 건물을 업그레이드, 특정 지역을 뚫어야 하는 등 초보자들이 얻기엔 힘든 물건들입니다.

부산 암웨이 프라자 Com mum of @krystalllkarma. Com › 01damdam › 223160672103스타듀밸리 헤일리 공략 생일, 호감도 선물, 이벤트, 결혼 가능. 제일 좋아함 분홍색 케이크, 코코넛, 과일 샐러드, 해바라기, 토끼발 좋아함 수선화, 쿠키, 아이스크림, 오믈렛, 피자, 해쉬브라운, 핫케이크, 샐러드, 회, 자수정, 아쿠아. Com › entry › 스타듀밸리스타듀밸리 헤일리 공략 선물위치이벤트. Com › haileyhyonihanhailey hyoni han 헤일리 @haileyhyonihan instagram.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.