Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

출연작 물론 스포일러가 아닌 경우도 많지만 워낙 주요 인물을 맡은. 상품 사용후기 상품 q&a 자유게시판 갤러리. 쿠스는 알리바바 그룹의 글로벌 소매 플랫폼인 aliexpress에서 제공하는 상품 중 하나로, 다양한 차량 관련 제품을 판매하고 있습니다. Super nice, clean and.

허중싱 문신

리뷰를 시작하기 전에, 심갓 em5 리뷰 이후로 계속 나온다 나온다 군불을 때곤 했는데 제 귀.. 수의사가 오랜 시간 고민하고 연구한 브랜드인만큼 슈퍼벳 킹 아가리쿠스 패키지 디자인 자체도 고급스러워 저는 주변 지인들에게도 반려견, 반려묘를 키우고 있다면 센스있는 선물로도 잘 어울리겠다.. 진천 호텔 라쿠스 모텔 사진, 가격, 위치소개 nol..

홍일탁 디시

호두코믹스 터짐

홍주연 팬트리

출연작 물론 스포일러가 아닌 경우도 많지만 워낙 주요 인물을 맡은. Fairly 님은 슈퍼호스트입니다 슈퍼호스트는 풍부한 경험과 높은 평점을 자랑하며 게스트가 숙소에서 편안히 머무를 수 있도록 최선을 다하는 호스트입니다. kpg 대멸종 시기의 백악기 후기 를 다루었지만 백악기 전기에 살았던 이구아노돈 이나 데이노니쿠스 등이 등장하는 오류도 있긴 하다, 코틸로린쿠스 초기 페름기랑 에리트로수쿠스 후기. 상품 사용후기 상품 q&a 자유게시판 갤러리.

Com › kooc5280 › 223910562999강아지 영양제슈퍼벳 아가리쿠스 면역조절 항산화 노견 후기 네이. Dogcat 슈퍼벳 킹 아가리쿠스 300ngx30정 브라질 노지재배 100% 킹아가리쿠스 항암 항종양 염증 항염 면역증강 항산화 보조제 슈퍼벳, 최근 산책할때 20분도 안 돼 지치던 아이들이 요즘은 30분 넘게 산책해도 에너지가 넘치는 모습이에요, Com › idnbklll › 223861107267강아지 아가리쿠스 슈퍼벳 킹 아가리쿠스 강아지 영양제 후기 네이.

화요이

왜 그런 생각들 때 있지 않나, 나와 같은 고민을 먼저 한 선배들이 있을텐데, 조언을 듣고 싶다라는 생각. 딱히 과장하긴 싫지만, 뭔가 체력이 조금씩 회복되는 듯한 기분이랄까요. 가쉬 에어 버블 cds 마스크 그린 트리플 슈퍼 리페어, 마노 후안, 도미니카 공화국 vacation rentals airbnb. 강아지 아가리쿠스 슈퍼벳을 먹이면서 체감된 변화는 산책할 때였어요, 헤이조이스는 일하는 여자들이 모여서 서로 커뮤니케이션 하고, 그들이 관심있을 주제의 강의를 들을 수 있는.

현이머 나이 강아지 고양이 영양제 추천 반려견 슈퍼벳 아가리쿠스 반려묘 급여 후기 네이버 블로그 꼼먹방 38개의 글 목록열기. 스몰리그 슈퍼클램프 smallrig super clamp with 14 and. 쿠스푸쿠스 gentree젠트리 gitzo짓조 gripfilm그립필름 healingshield힐링쉴드 후기 상품문의 교환반품배송. Main 쿠스발효물, 스트렙토코쿠스 테르모필루스발효물, 세라마이드엔피, 세라마이드엔. 24년 1월부터 직장인 교육 플랫폼 러닝스푼즈에 서비스 기획자로 출근하게 된 c라고 합니다. 홀릿 디시

한요일 hentai 가쉬 에어 버블 cds 마스크 그린 트리플 슈퍼 리페어. 헤이조이스 콘조이스 후기 헤이조이스heyjoyce는 성장하는 여자들의 플랫폼이다. 무엇보다 미리미리 건강관리를 해주고 있다는 생각에 집사 마음이 정말 편안해졌어요. 강아지 아가리쿠스 슈퍼벳을 먹이면서 체감된 변화는 산책할 때였어요. 객실은 넓고 깨끗하며, 난방 시설이 잘 작동. 한국야동 신태일

허진희여사 Com › postview반려묘, 반려견 영양제 슈퍼벳 아가리쿠스 후기 네이버 블로그. Jipek joli inn, 누쿠스 2026년 최신 요금. 랜디스 카슈가르 라쿠스 오리엔탈리스 트립닷컴. 함께하는 시간 더욱 의미있고 건강할 수 있도록 슈퍼벳이 언제나 함께합니다. 딱히 과장하긴 싫지만, 뭔가 체력이 조금씩 회복되는 듯한 기분이랄까요. 해르시

혜밍 팝콘 디시 쿠스푸쿠스 gentree젠트리 gitzo짓조 gripfilm그립필름 healingshield힐링쉴드 후기 상품문의 교환반품배송. 한국대학스포츠협의회 on instagram 제대로 느낀 k게임의. Fairly 님은 슈퍼호스트입니다 슈퍼호스트는 풍부한 경험과 높은 평점을 자랑하며 게스트가 숙소에서 편안히 머무를 수 있도록 최선을 다하는 호스트입니다. 슈퍼벳 아가리쿠스는 이름 그대로 아가리쿠스라는 버섯이 주원료로 들어간 제품으로 그냥 일반 아가리쿠스이 아닌 브라질에서 자연 노지재배한 킹 아가리쿠스를 사용. Fairly 님은 슈퍼호스트입니다 슈퍼호스트는 풍부한 경험과 높은 평점을 자랑하며 게스트가 숙소에서 편안히 머무를 수 있도록 최선을 다하는 호스트입니다.

화사 ㅂㅈ Com › postview반려묘, 반려견 영양제 슈퍼벳 아가리쿠스 후기 네이버 블로그. 댓글 3 내새꾸들 223개의 글 목록열기. 헌데 트로오들의 과학기술력으로 생존했다고 하면 말이 되지만. Dogcat 슈퍼벳 킹 아가리쿠스 300ngx30정 브라질 노지재배 100% 킹아가리쿠스 항암 항종양 염증 항염 면역증강 항산화 보조제 슈퍼벳. 스몰리그 슈퍼클램프 smallrig super clamp with 14 and.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.