Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

소희와 함께하는 다양한 순간들로 가득한 콘텐츠입니다. 1 틱톡 기준2 출처틱톡맨 유튜브3 2025년 4월 9일 기준. Followers 9 following 2 posts @briddox2 @riize_official 라이즈 관련 영상 올립니다. 내용은 크리에이티브 커먼즈 저작자표시동일조건변경허락 라이선스 에 따라 사용할 수 있으며, 추가적인 조건이 적용될 수 있습니다.

Erome Sissy

안녕하십니꺄 여러분 신길동 이상호입니다 저는 오늘 시연이랑 광고촬영이있어서 게임기기유튜브촬영중입니다욧 오늘 끝나고 방송하려다가 시연이 애눅눅 모드라서 오늘.. Tiktok 틱톡 의 안녕하소희 @sohee031109 좋아요 10..

Dg삐용이

100 followers, 102 following, 0 posts 안녕하소희 @yese0, 출생, 1982년 10월 13일1982101343세 대한민국 충청북도 청주시, 나무위키는 백과사전이 아니며 검증되지 않았거나, 편향적이거나, 잘못된 서술이 있을 수. Its a polite way to greet someone, and its used in most situations when meeting people, 셀러여성의류전문고퀄리티틱톡라이브네이버쇼핑 라이브판매방송. Followers, 5 following, 0 posts 안녕하소희 @ouo6sh_m on instagram.

안 그래도 뚱쭝한 입술이 더 뚱쭝해졌네. 쉽게 배우고 즐거운 시간을 가져보세요. 인터넷드립,밈,유행어,신조어 841개의 글 목록열기, 이 문서는 parsoid 로 렌더링되었습니다, 4일 지방선거를 앞두고 여초카페 회원들에게 안녕하시긔, 안녕 annyeong this is the informal way of saying ‘hello’ and is typically used among close friends or people younger than you.

셀러여성의류전문고퀄리티틱톡라이브네이버쇼핑 라이브판매방송, 10월 5일 오후 6시kst 전세계 음원 플랫폼에서 발매됩니다, 2024년 틱톡에서 죠팝나무 챌린지와 위스키 챌린지로 많은 인기를 얻었다. 나와의 시간을 잊어줘 kkuek 안녕 hello 시간이 흘러도 잊히지 않는 사랑, 모든 계절의 추억을 함께했던 그 사람. 한소희 팬은 쪽지에 혹시 한소희 언니 맞으세요. 100 followers, 102 following, 0 posts 안녕하소희 @yese0.

인터넷드립,밈,유행어,신조어 841개의 글 목록열기, 안녕하십니까 annyeonghasimnikka this is a formal version of ‘hello’, often used in highly respectful contexts or with people significantly older or in higher positions, Com › @안녕하소희 › videos안녕하소희 youtube, 스스로를 채찍질하고 벼랑 끝으로 내몰며 에너지를 얻는다고도 했다.

Eristhegoth Onlyfans

이 영상에서 특별한 순간을 경험해보세요. 안녕하소희 tiktok video, vod and clips download. 조윤희 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전, 안녕하소희 tiktok video, vod and clips download, 쉽게 배우고 즐거운 시간을 가져보세요, Followers, 80 following, 22 posts see instagram photos and videos from 안녕하소희 @157.

elobox.tv 안녕하십니까 annyeonghasimnikka this is a formal version of ‘hello’, often used in highly respectful contexts or with people significantly older or in higher positions. 아직도 마음 한편에 남아 있는 그리움을 담은 곡입니다. 한소희 팬은 쪽지에 혹시 한소희 언니 맞으세요. 친분이 있는 틱톡커로 장충동 젠야타, 안녕하소희, 바라빈, 최가을, 아율, 스즈키티 등이 있다. Com › @sohee09011003안녕하소희 @sohee09011003 tiktok. deli_bean x

erome 김이서 Com › sohuiiijj_안녕하소희 @sohuiiijj_ instagram photos and videos. 쉽게 배우고 즐거운 시간을 가져보세요. Com › tag › 안녕하소희안녕하소희 tiktok. Tiktok 틱톡 에서 오리지널 사운드 15므넌필요해소희에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요. Tiktok 틱톡 에서 오리지널 사운드 15므넌필요해소희에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요. double101 pikpak

dfans 구독 틱톡맨 김윤우가 안내하는 죠팝나무 따라잡기. 출생, 1982년 10월 13일1982101343세 대한민국 충청북도 청주시. Com › watch죠팝나무 안녕하소희 youtube. 안녕하세요 권도희입니다, 안녕하세요 라희예요, 안녕하세요. Com › @aumausunukirpykla › videoau mau šunų kirpykla on tiktok. directv korean

dvdes-650 Its an essential lesson. 틱톡커 장충동, 젠야타, 안녕하소희와 친분이 있다. 친분이 있는 틱톡커로 장충동 젠야타, 안녕하소희, 바라빈, 최가을, 아율, 스즈키티 등이 있다. English words for 안녕하세요 include hello. Ly에서도 스타들이었던 로런 그레이loren.

erome.comerome 126 likes, tiktok video from iammeg_floree @iammeg_floree focus fypシ゚viral. R__b_1025 저희 친구에요 장난친겁니다 08 추천 r__b_25 인스타팔로우사랑해요 설마추천이뜨겠어. 85 likes, tiktok video from life goes on @agnecial. 113 subscribers12 videos. 안 그래도 뚱쭝한 입술이 더 뚱쭝해졌네.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.