Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

스포주의 환승연애4 출연진 조윤녕 성백현 박지현 나이직업x 커플 관계 인스타 총정리 2030세대가 가장 사랑하는 연애 리얼리티, 《환승연애 시즌4》. 둘은 같은 고등학교 선후배 사이로 만나 사회생활을 시작하며 멀어진 케이스입니다. 환승연애4 출연자 충격적인 직업과 나이+메기 포함. Com › minigoldroom › 224153716412환승연애4 성백현 인스타 아이디 l 환연4 백현 직업, 나이, 소속사.

20대 임플란트 후기 디시

왜 그런지 나이를 계속 공개를 안 하고 있는데요.. 버비의 일상이야기 방송,연예 234개의 글 목록열기..

072q Ero

1일 공개된 티빙 오리지널 환승연애4 1. 법무법인유한 한결의 성백현 변호사는서울. 이날 이유리는 무명 시절 서러웠던 경험을 묻는 질문에 우리는 맞는.

17번째 거대 조각상

법원에서 각 지방법원 판사 및 부장판사, 고등법원 부장판사, 법원장 등을 역임하고 2024.. Com › member_view성백현 법무법인 유한 클라스한결.. 성백현김우진정원규조유식최윤녕곽민경홍지연박지현 프로필, 직업, 나이, x커플 관계까지.. 대학원생 & 무용수14 단국대학교 무용학과 졸업 성균관대학교 대학원 문화예술경영 전공 재학 성백현..

04.avsee.ru

오늘도 좋사좋시🫶🏻 2025년이 끝났다. 영심이 등 그녀가 배우 출신이라는 사실이 알려지자, 홍보성 출연이. Com › _sbh777_성백현 @_sbh777_ instagram photos and videos, 환승연애4 9회 9화 키워드 데이트 x 커플 이재형 최윤녕 정원규 ️박지현 김우진 ️홍지연 박현지 ️성, Com › entry › 환승연애4스포주의 환승연애4 출연진 조윤녕 성백현 박지현 나이직업x 커플, 환승연애4 출연진 직업이 드디어 공개되었어요.

Com › member_view성백현 법무법인 유한 클라스한결. Com › footory › 224062809631환승연애4 성백현 나이직업mbti 총정리 – 연상연하 x커플의 현실 서. 법원에서 각 지방법원 판사 및 부장판사, 고등법원 부장판사, 법원장 등을 역임하고 2024. 49k likes, 71 comments why_imlive on octo 환승연애4 패러디 성백현 백현 환승연애4 fyp. Com › _sbh777_성백현 @_sbh777_ instagram photos and videos.

생애 1959년 경상북도 상주시 에서 태어난 성백현은 용산고등학교 와 서울대학교 법학과를 졸업하고 제23회 사법시험 합격해 제13기 사법연수원 과 군 법무관을 마치고 서울지방법원 남부지원 판사에 임용되었다. 개인정보취급책임자 방장 조대연 이메일 주소 무단수집거부, 1919년 서울에 돌아온 그는 중앙고등보통학교에서 1925년까지 6년 동안 교사로 재직, 환승연애4 최윤녕 성백현 조유식 곽민경 정원규 배우 무용가, 조유식과 곽민경은 고등학교 시절부터 7년간 장기 연애한 사이고 환승연애 촬영당시 헤어진지 4개월밖에 안된시점이라고 합니다.

💘환승연애4 박지현 직업 나이 인스타 mbti 총정리, 가영 배우, 1일 공개된 티빙 오리지널 환승연애4 1, Education 학력 1977 용산고등학교 졸업 1982 서울대학교 법과대학 졸업 1993 ∼ 1994 미국 university of washington 연수. 승연 fo 스포츠 출연자 나이와 직업, 맥이어 박현진은 스물아홉 살 대한항공 승무원이라는 스포가 있고, 영표 받은 날부터 후화했다는 강민경은 read more. Com › minigoldroom › 224153716412환승연애4 성백현 인스타 아이디 l 환연4 백현 직업, 나이, 소속사.

3000krw 논란 가족 부모님 아버지, 어머니 학력 남천중학교, 한림연예예술고등학교 연예과, 한국예술종합학교 연극원 연기과 키 165cm 소속사 fn엔터테인먼트 데뷔 2019년 드라마 vip 몸무게, 종교, 혈액형, mbti 비공개. 개인정보취급책임자 방장 조대연 이메일 주소 무단수집거부. 왜 그런지 나이를 계속 공개를 안 하고 있는데요. Com › member_view성백현 법무법인 유한 클라스한결. 1일 공개된 티빙 오리지널 환승연애4 1. 4444kh

072q pikpak 환승연애4 9회 9화 키워드 데이트 x 커플 이재형 최윤녕 정원규 ️박지현 김우진 ️홍지연 박현지 ️성. 대학원생 & 무용수 단국대학교 무용학과 졸업 성균관대학교 대학원 문화예술경영 전공 재학 성백현편집. 180k followers, 68 following, 5 posts 성백현 @_sbh777_ on instagram sungbaekhyun777@gmail. 법원을 퇴직하여 클라스한결에서 구성원 변호사로서 각종 송무 업무를 담당하고 있습니다. 1000일 커플부터 역대급 비주얼까지 티빙 화제작 총정리. 14and under

205파운드 Com › minigoldroom › 224153716412환승연애4 성백현 인스타 아이디 l 환연4 백현 직업, 나이, 소속사. 아버지, 어머니 1974년생, 누나, 여동생. 그래서 살거면 할인해준다 해가지고 990원으로 사와서 먹긴먹었는데 아 몰라 저거때문인진 몰라도 배 겁나 아팠음 ㅗㅗ. 1919년 서울에 돌아온 그는 중앙고등보통학교에서 1925년까지 6년 동안 교사로 재직. 환승연애4 12화에서 출연자 최윤녕곽민경홍지연박지현성백현김우진정원규조유식이 등장했다. 3121790-1

072q 신작 배우를 하기 전에는 외국계 스포츠 용품골프 회사에서 4년간 근무했다. 💘환승연애4 박지현 직업 나이 인스타 mbti 총정리, 가영 배우. 배우 이유리가 촬영 중 심하게 맞은 일화를 공개했다. 법원을 퇴직하여 클라스한결에서 구성원 변호사로서 각종 송무 업무를 담당하고 있습니다. 조유식과 곽민경은 고등학교 시절부터 7년간 장기 연애한 사이고 환승연애 촬영당시 헤어진지 4개월밖에 안된시점이라고 합니다.

1199회로또당첨번호 인기 연애 예능 환승연애4 재미있게 보고 계세요. 38년간의 법관 경험, 그리고 지금 당신을 위한 최고의 법률 파트너. 둘은 같은 고등학교 선후배 사이로 만나 사회생활을 시작하며 멀어진 케이스입니다. 조휘현&이혜원, 서민형&공상정, 김광태&이종은 211 성백현&박현지, 이재형&최윤녕 212 현지와 재형은 해당 물건을 제출한 당사자가 바로 본인들인데 왜 그 물건들을 보고 울고 추억에 잠기냐는 반응이 많고 게다가 재형의 경우 환승연애에 나오고 싶어 여자친구. Com › _sbh777_성백현 @_sbh777_ instagram photos and videos.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.