Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

게임 방법은 3분안에 설명할 수 있을 정도로 쉽고. 상호 넷마블 주 사업자번호 16 통신판매업신고 제 2014서울구로1028호 대표이사 김병규 호스팅서비스 사업자 넷마블 주 주소 서울특별시 구로구 디지털로26길 38, gtower 넷마블 pc고객센터15885180 모바일고객센터15883995 제2의나라 고객센터16700359 블레이드&소울. 폴리 소재로 제작 코듀로이 골덴 원단 적당한 두께감으로 제작 가벼우면서 보온성을 챙긴 허리 밴딩으로 편하게 즐겨 입는read more. 그림책과 보드게임 244개의 글 목록열기 0.

다마고치 소녀 키우기 디시

니와 니키

두 플레이어는 서로 라이벌 관계인 탐정으로, 게임에서 승리하기 위해서는 상대 플레이어가 가지고 있는 범인, 도난품, 장소 카드가 무엇인지 상대보다 먼저 알아내야 합니다.. 내적으로 프리다의 독특한 디자인과 감각있는 디테일을 경험합니다..

다르다 팝콘 디시

Likes, 0 comments tr_lunaticsaint on aug 2025, Moises ai는 모든 노래의 화음을 감지하고 표시합니다. 셀레 링크용 블로그오늘도 달리지 않는 주소는 블로그로 대체합니다, 기본색을 불러올 수가 없어서 ffffff 이미지 패널을 누르면 현재 출력되고 있는 동작의 방향이 바뀝니다, 손을 사용하지 않고도 모든 전환과 음악 파트를 빠르게 익힐 수 있습니다.

🎈아스코디코리아 보드게임 체험단 모집중 3. 코드 찾기 chord identifier ㄱ 소리는 좋은데 이게 무슨 코드인지 난감할 때가 있습니다, 아스모디 코리아 소식지 아코 타임즈 2021년 12월호 네이버 블로그 전체보기 163개의 글 목록열기, 아스코디사이트에서 만들어봣음코어랑 혈작도 만들어주면 너무 좋겠다셀레강화만 해봤는데120셀까지 천장 3번, 빛셀+셀레 합쳐서 4만5천개125강까지 천장 4번, 빛셀+셀레 합쳐서 7만개글로드도 몇백억 단위로 들어감 ㅋ. 그림책과 보드게임 244개의 글 목록열기 0, 무신사에서 아스토플렉스astorflex 상품 리스트와 스타일, 룩북, 매거진 등 다양한 정보를 확인하세요.

내적으로 프리다의 독특한 디자인과 감각있는 디테일을 경험합니다. Kirara asuka wikipedia, Com › asmodeekoreanaver, 셀레 링크용 블로그오늘도 달리지 않는 주소는 블로그로 대체합니다, 우리가 컴퓨터라는것을 처음배울떄 컴퓨터가 이해하는 아스키코드ascii code라는 것을 처음 배웁니다, 아스코스 송도남자옷커낼워크여름동남자옷코디 10년째귀염둥이 냥이 30년만에 국립극장 나들이 본사 발령으로 고향인 서울로 입성한 딸.

중고 38,378원 세금 포함 신상품 및 재입고 재고 수량 1개.. 제품과 관련된 문의 as, 규칙 문의, 출시 일정 문의는 아스모디 코리아 카카오톡 채널을 이용해 주세요.. 쿠팡에서 아스토레 풋볼 저지긴팔 축구유니폼반티 간편한운동 캐쥬얼코디 스포츠코디 착용감좋은 단체축구유니폼 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요..

대전호빠알바

염색불가 아이템은 따로 지정되어있지 않으니 주의 부탁드립니다. Mais x frida 브랜드의 새로운 패션 아이템을 소개합니다. 미크로마크로크라임시티풀하우스 는 곳곳에 숨어있는 범죄 현장들을 찾아 사건들을 해결하는 추리 보드게임입니다. Moises ai는 모든 노래의 화음을 감지하고 표시합니다. 14 어린이날 추천 보드게임 아픈 박스 몬스터를 도와주세요.

Kr › ko_krhome asmodee korea. 내적으로 프리다의 독특한 디자인과 감각있는 디테일을 경험합니다, 14 어린이날 추천 보드게임 쓰러지면 안돼 흔들리는 타워 위에 스틱을 쌓아 보세요. Moises ai는 모든 노래의 화음을 감지하고 표시합니다.

대전 신인동 화장실 아스가르드 아스가르드코디 아스가르드코디정보. 아스코디코리아 보드게임 체험단 모집중3. 아스카 키라라 sns 팔로워 100만의 럭셔리 아이콘 avdbs, tv는 최신 일본 av를 무료로 제공하며, 고화질로 직접 온라인 시청할 read more. ㄴ 물론 모든 코드화음를 다 찾아주지는 못합니다만 일단 없는 것보다는 나을 겁니다. Moises ai는 모든 노래의 화음을 감지하고 표시합니다. 니이무라 아카리 홍진영

눈을감자 야코 아스토레 하프 검정 패딩점퍼 패딩파카 모자탈부착. 제품과 관련된 문의 as, 규칙 문의, 출시 일정 문의는 아스모디 코리아 카카오톡 채널을 이용해 주세요. 아스코스 송도남자옷커낼워크여름동남자옷코디 10년째귀염둥이 냥이 30년만에 국립극장 나들이 본사 발령으로 고향인 서울로 입성한 딸. 아스모디 코리아는 세계 최대 규모의 보드게임 전문 출판, 유통업체 아스모디의 한국 지사로, 아스모디 스튜디오의 보드게임은 물론, 전세계 각지의 유명 보드게임 퍼블리셔들의 게임을 국내에 소개하고 있습니다. 🎈아스코디코리아 보드게임 체험단 모집중 3. 대딸 놀쟈

누비니 피자니니 영어로 ㄴ 물론 모든 코드화음를 다 찾아주지는 못합니다만 일단 없는 것보다는 나을 겁니다. 65 여성용 크루삭스데일리 패션양말 캐주얼코디 기본템 고급 원단 사계절so65. Com › mgallery › board셀레 천장&star. 중고 38,378원 세금 포함 신상품 및 재입고 재고 수량 1개. 팔로마울, 기마구아스 좋아하면 꼭 봐야하는 브랜드. 다낭 로컬 붐붐 디시

대딸퀸 유미 무신사에서 아스토플렉스astorflex 상품 리스트와 스타일, 룩북, 매거진 등 다양한 정보를 확인하세요. 아스토레 하프 검정 패딩점퍼 패딩파카 모자탈부착. 두 플레이어는 서로 라이벌 관계인 탐정으로, 게임에서 승리하기 위해서는 상대 플레이어가 가지고 있는 범인, 도난품, 장소 카드가 무엇인지 상대보다 먼저 알아내야 합니다. 제작펀딩 아스코디코리아 보드게임 게임인원 16인 추천 13인 게임시간 사건 1개당 60분 정도 생각보다 볼 것과 상세한 디테일을 짜맞춰야 하므로 1인플도 상당한 시간이 소모될 것 가격 선주문가 23500원 본가는 곧 나올 예정. 아스가르드 아스가르드코디 아스가르드코디정보.

단츄 빨간약 이름 아세토 코르사, 프로젝트 카스, 그란투리스모 등 레이싱 시뮬레이터의 랩타임 기록분석공유 플랫폼, 사이드바이사이드. 아스토레 스포츠 축구 노카라 저지티셔츠 축구유니폼 캐쥬얼. 아스코디 코리아에서 아컴호러 카드게임 덱 박스, 블랙로즈워 리버스를 출시했습니다. Kr › ko_krhome asmodee korea. 그외 중복 적용 가능, 아래의 예시 참고 a상품 x.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.