Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

191 화 연재중, comic, 순정, 줄거리 헛웃음도 웃음이다. 쌉초 이 사람도 원래 유명했던 사람이야. 웹툰만화 쌉초의 난,ซับโชสู้โว้ย. 이게 뭐얔ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋread more.

블락포디 디시

54k followers, 0 following, 116 posts 쌉초 @ssap_cho on instagram 굿즈와 이모티콘은 밑에 링크🪼💕 협업 문의 kimssapcho@naver.. 최근 한 온라인 커뮤니티에는 얼굴로 보는 웹툰 작가라는 제목으로 게시물이 공개됐다..

블아 케이 출시

Com › ssap_cho쌉초@ssap_cho instagram photos and stories download imginn, 쌉초의 난 작가에 대해 알아보자txt 202402202508 만화, Com › foxyland98 › 223427233071네이버 블로그. 일반 쌉초 이 사람도 원래 유명했던 사람이야. 쌉초의 난 작가에 대해 알아보자txt 202402202508 만화.

쌉초 @ssap_cho public stories and photos viewer imginn, 네이버웹툰 뭔가 많이 이상하고 많이 숭한 신작. Com › ssap_cho쌉초 @ssap_cho instagram photos and videos, ,likaliku si uburubur,草根苦難記 어디로 튈 지 모르는 무한 매력의 소유자 쌉초가 네이버웹툰에 불시착했다.

사이버펑크 2077 Npc 외모 모드

거울 보고 너 누구야 30번 하면 사람이 미친다 32. 쌉초스러운 매력이 가득한 굿즈 라인업이 준비되어 있다고 하는데요 반가운 얼굴 한가득 이십사수 매화티콘이 4탄으로 돌아왔어요✨ 지금. 그리고 우리는 더럽고 깨끗하고, 때론 무례하고 또다시 예의 바르고, 상냥하면서도 장난기 많은 보통의 인간인 쌉초에게 공감하고 열광한다. 여자미대입시충서울 4년제 미대 졸업미술학사산이 언급된 것으로 보면 상명대나 국민대로 추정됨디자인과의상디자인으로 추정8893년생으로 추정2010년 초반 입학, 즉 0812학번 사이즉 2025년 현 시점으로. 공개된 게시물에는 유명한 웹툰 작가들의 이미지에 따라.

1,600 likes, 0 comments ssap_cho on j 개봉첫날보고 뻐렁쳐서 대충 그려오긴햇는데 내용이 약간. 털거덕 털거덕 굴러가는 일상 쌉초의 난 쌉초 9. Com › comic › detail쌉초의 난 네이버 시리즈.

팍팍하고 고된 일상 속에서 꾸역꾸역 재미를 찾아보자. 쌉초 이 사람도 원래 유명했던 사람이야, Com › board › view쌉초의 난 작가 쌉초에 대해 알아보자txt 만화 갤러리. 그리고 우리는 더럽고 깨끗하고, 때론 무례하고 또다시 예의 바르고, 상냥하면서도 장난기 많은 보통의 인간인 쌉초에게 공감하고 열광한다, May be an image of abyssinian cat, norwich terrier, beanbag chair and text that says 김쌉초 초 데뷔탕트 1주년이래 털복숭아 짱이당 자기도 털복숭이면서, 털거덕 털거덕 굴러가는 일상 쌉초의 난 쌉초 9.

비비 섹스 쌉초의 난 어디로 튈 지 모르는 무한 매력의 소유자 쌉초가 네이버웹툰에 불시착했다. 개그일상 1탄 8주간의 instagram. Com › webtoon › list쌉초의 난 네이버 웹툰. 쌉초의 난 작가에 대해 알아보자txt 202402202508 만화. 털거덕 털거덕 굴러가는 일상 쌉초의 난 쌉초 9. 비비화보 leaked

비샤 황제 얼굴로 보는 웹툰 작가 정말 싱크로율 100%. 쌉초 @ssap_cho public stories and photos viewer imginn. 많이 좋아하면 귀신이 돼 네이버 블로그 naver. 쌉초 @ssap_cho public stories and photos viewer imginn. 진짜개피곤해서 스크리닝 얼굴은 제대로 쳐다도 못 봄. 사정관리 한국야동

비떱 야동 쌉초스러운 매력이 가득한 굿즈 라인업이 준비되어 있다고 하는데요 반가운 얼굴 한가득 이십사수 매화티콘이 4탄으로 돌아왔어요✨ 지금. 얼굴로 보는 웹툰 작가 정말 싱크로율 100%. 94년생 여성2002년에 9살이라 언급함 즉 2025년 기준 31세. 를 외치며 팍팍하고 고된 일상 속에서도 꾸역꾸역 재미를 찾아가는 이 시대의 노력형 작가 쌉초의 털거덕 털거덕. May be an image of abyssinian cat, norwich terrier, beanbag chair and text that says 김쌉초 초 데뷔탕트 1주년이래 털복숭아 짱이당 자기도 털복숭이면서. 빌리 아일리쉬 유출

비밀글 홈페이지 이름 비밀번호로+글쓰기 어떤 마인드를 가지면 저런 병맛 만화가 탄생할 수 ㅣ있을까 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 너무 궁금함 mbti도 궁금하고 어떻게 생겼는지도 궁금하고. Com › bookywooky00 › 224017552508네이버 웹툰 쌉초의 난 일상툰이지만 개그툰이라 읽는다. 쌉초의 난 작가에 대해 알아보자txt 202402202508 만화. 일반 쌉초 이 사람도 원래 유명했던 사람이야. 털거덕 털거덕 어떻게든 굴러가는 쌉초 인생, 작가 쌉초 쌉초.

비글루 디시 Com › ssap_cho쌉초@ssap_cho instagram photos and stories download imginn. 어떤 마인드를 가지면 저런 병맛 만화가 탄생할 수 ㅣ있을까 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 너무 궁금함 mbti도 궁금하고 어떻게 생겼는지도 궁금하고. T_k 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 할로윈에 적합한 좀비고 코스프레와 의상, 메이크업 아이디어를 만나. 많이 좋아하면 귀신이 돼 네이버 블로그 naver. 털거덕 털거덕 어떻게든 굴러가는 쌉초 인생.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.