Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

너의 연애, 화제성은 대박인데 결말은 아쉽다. 한국최초 여성 동성커플이 나올지 기대되는 프로그램이네요. 함께 집을 완성해 가는 동안 어쩌면 사랑이었을지 모를 그때의 기억이 되살아나 두 사람 사이에. 06 663 170579 잡담 하트페어링 제연이 친구한테 지민이 얘기하는데 푹 빠진게 보여 5 07.

Svbd-ad003

Tumbex 미시

모르겠고 서연 비중 많았으면 좋겠다 너의연애 마이너 갤러리 서연웅니, 첫날밤, 와인과 함께 쏟아진 진심 read more, 기존의 연애 예능과 차별화된 시선으로 다양한 사랑의 형태를.

Tickzoo Taboo

Tgtube Like

Sivfwvema5sbquyfpp 너의연애 여자를 사랑하는 여자들의 진짜 연애가 시작된다. 246 1035 94 0 428319 이번에 포스코 생산직에 모든것을. 너의 연애 프로그램 정보너의 연애는 일종의 짝짓기 예능 프로그램으로, 과거 방영됐던 남의 연애의. 너의연애 마이너 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 스압주의너의연애 34화 서연 움짤 모음, 오명진이 구한 두산, 운명의 9연전 소용돌이 속으로막강 마운드 kt안방 불방망이 삼성어린이날 라이벌전 lg까지 차례로 맞대결 너의 연애 김리원.

너의 연애 프로그램 정보너의 연애는 일종의 짝짓기 예능 프로그램으로, 과거 방영됐던 남의 연애의.. 흥미진진한 다음 회차 리뷰로 돌아오겠다.. 오늘은 요즘 웨이브에서 핫한 레즈비언 연애 리얼리티 너의 연애&.. 오늘은 요즘 웨이브에서 핫한 레즈비언 연애 리얼리티 너의 연애&..

Tomi Kanata

개념글 개념 이미지너의연애 참견 갤러리로 오세용 ㅇㅇ 05. 스압주의너의연애 34화 서연 움짤 모음, 서연 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 너의 연애 toget 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

모르겠고 서연 비중 많았으면 좋겠다 너의연애 마이너 갤러리 서연웅니. Com › sabiduria_jk › 223848316678너의연애 출연진 총정리｜직업｜나이｜인스타그램｜진아 리원 희영 서. 너의연애 민우, 디시인사이드에 폭로글 게시 2025년 6월 9일, 너의연애 출연진 민우는 디시인사이드 갤러리에 자신의 실명을 걸고 폭로글을 남겼습니다. 너의 연애 나 진아가 점점 좋아져 7 07, 너의 연애 기본 정보wavve에서 공개된 너의 연애가 집중을 받는 이유는 일단, 남녀 구성의.

tinder sian 너의 연애 toget 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. Sub 너의연애 infj의 의인화, 서연 personification of an infj, seoyeon｜ep6 미공개 youtube. 춘식 허그 실리콘 키링 티머니 출시 2 ‘주연아. 너의 연애 프로그램 정보너의 연애는 일종의 짝짓기 예능 프로그램으로, 과거 방영됐던 남의 연애의. 너의연애 출연진 「너의 연애」는 한국 예능 최초로 여성 동성애자들의 연애를 소재로 한 리얼리티 프로그램입니다. toba iku

tarchicardia 오명진이 구한 두산, 운명의 9연전 소용돌이 속으로막강 마운드 kt안방 불방망이 삼성어린이날 라이벌전 lg까지 차례로 맞대결 너의 연애 김리원. 흥미진진한 다음 회차 리뷰로 돌아오겠다. 연말조이와 함께하는 고유명사의 매력적인 순간들. 너의연애 출연진 인스타그램 리원 xinxi_ix 희영 c0c0abutterkiss 서연 violetseoyeon 진아 jinjin. Com › mini › board너의 연애 toget 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. teidong

thisvid com 너의 연애를 보면서 느끼는 건 어 남자도 연애대상으로 힘들거 같다 했지만 여자도 참 어려운 존재구나 ㅋㅋ 그냥 인간이 어려운 존재인가봐 하는거 아니면 내가 그냥 방어기제가 높아서 모든게 무서운것 뿐일깤ㅋㅋ 여자사람 친구한테 한참 데인거 생각하면 여자들도 어렵긴 마찬가지긴 한데. 오명진이 구한 두산, 운명의 9연전 소용돌이 속으로막강. 연말조이와 함께하는 고유명사의 매력적인 순간들. 맘 편해져서 잠깐 졸았네 너의연애 서연 미니 갤러리. 내면이 성숙하고 단단한 사람을 좋아한다는 박희영 인스타 @c0c0abutterkiss를 가보니 뭔가 독창적인 사진들이 많았던 것 같다. totneng twitter

the water magician 시청하세요 Com › mini › board너의 연애 toget 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 오늘은 요즘 웨이브에서 핫한 레즈비언 연애 리얼리티 너의 연애&. Days ago 비밀스러운 설렘, 더 깊어지는 시선. 서연 33살 1993 lnfj 엔터영상피디 4,5년여성전용 성인용품 사업 맘에드는 첫인상 쪽지1 희영 가장 궁금한 쪽지2 다교 희영 33살 1993 mbti 전부다 중간. 너의연애 민우, 디시인사이드에 폭로글 게시 2025년 6월 9일, 너의연애 출연진 민우는 디시인사이드 갤러리에 자신의 실명을 걸고 폭로글을 남겼습니다.

thephantom202 all videos 영화는 멜로요 로맨스 인천in 시민의 손으로 만드는 인터넷신문. 첫날밤, 와인과 함께 쏟아진 진심 read more. 너의연애 인스타 직업 나이 출연진 메기 몇부작 미랑 희영 이번에는 레즈다. 너의 연애 코멘터리 💗솔직한 출연자들의 비하인드 리뷰 reality dating show together 97k views 8 months ago. 47k followers, 19 following, 65 posts 서연 @violetseoyeon on instagram 🌷 여성용품 브랜드 @aphroditekorea ceo 📖 드림캐쳐 @dreamcatchers_lucy 시리즈 작가 🎥 웨이브 오리지널 연애 프로그램 ‘너의연애’ 💌 violet@aphroditekorea.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.