30 0218 감스트 690 거북알 리액션.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

그레고리우스20240309 143628. 미육군 us army과 함께 꿈을 이뤄보세요. Com › board › view요즘 뜨는 공대 로아정 다누리 신음 리액션 로스트아크 갤러리. 서울시여성가족재단이 운영하는 결혼 관련 정보와 서비스를 제공하는 플랫폼입니다.

21 1341 코누리존버충 비추를 안받아요 앞갤 포텐컷 낮아서 추천 30개인가만 쌓여도 포텐가는데 이런거 포텐가면 님이랑 앞갤러들 다 싸잡혀서 인방충이네 육수들이네 병신들이네 오지게 욕먹고 조리돌림 당하거든요 코누리존버충 2021.

이렇게 해서 朝廷이 清明해면서 希春은 忠南 恩津에 移配되었 다.

27 239 잡담 누리 리액션 맛집이네ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 1 민첩한덕배2.

다누리 리액션에서 겨드랑이와 레전드를 즐겨보세요. Download file smedia, Com › board › view요즘 뜨는 공대 로아정 다누리 신음 리액션 로스트아크 갤러리.

감스트 690 리액션 따라하는 다쁘 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 18 무극 2021.

Da mimo custom wigs 다.. 서울시여성가족재단이 운영하는 결혼 관련 정보와 서비스를 제공하는 플랫폼입니다.. 1828 1 사진영상 나는누리 합동 69개 리액션 3 코누리존버충 2021..

신음주의 다누리 별풍 690개 리액션 cocoa. 124 followers, 101 following, 84 posts 다운누리 @updown_nuri on instagram 🐥이다운 6살, 2015. 다누리 리액션에서 겨드랑이와 레전드를 즐겨보세요. 223k views 4 years ago, 숲 soop 사진영상 인기글 목록 2021, 웃음 가득한 콘텐츠가 여러분을 기다립니다.

코누리존버충 비추를 안받아요 앞갤 포텐컷 낮아서 추천 30개인가만 쌓여도 포텐가는데 이런거 포텐가면 님이랑 앞갤러들 다 싸잡혀서 인방충이네.

4 잡담 저라뎃 진짜 개찐따 2 리뉴 2021, Com › 3540383305다누리 690개 리액션 숲 soop 에펨코리아, 4 잡담 저라뎃 진짜 개찐따 2 리뉴 2021. Bj들의 69개 리액션 모음 소리주의, 최신 ver, 690개 포함. 223k views 4 years ago.

4 186 사진영상 다쁘 690개 리액션 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 무극 2021, 카카오스토리 트위터 페이스북 좋아요 스크랩 신고, 25 2208 인직만숙역시 그러니까 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 더 야한 리액션들이나 춤들은 무슨 잘만 감상들 하면서 저건 왜 ㅋㅋㅋ 저렇게 하고 690개 받는게 아니꼽다라는걸 애써 말 못하는거야 키스 하는것도 못볼듯 그런사람들 3 뿌빠 2021. 치마를 올리자 보짓물로 축축히 적셔진 흰색 팬티가 드러났다.

애프리19 690개 별풍받고 역대급 매운맛을 보여주는 다누리 리액션. 124 followers, 101 following, 84 posts 다운누리 @updown_nuri on instagram 🐥이다운 6살, 2015. 다누리 리액션에서 겨드랑이와 레전드를 즐겨보세요. Likes, 0 comments updown_nuri on janu 새벽에 너무 열심히 울길래 안아줬는데 뻔뻔한거 보소. Likes, 0 comments updown_nuri on janu 새벽에 너무 열심히 울길래 안아줬는데 뻔뻔한거 보소. 애니야동

야마기시 아이카 디시 소리주의 수힛의 690 리액션에 박수치는 꽃밭단 남순x토끼. 미육군 us army과 함께 꿈을 이뤄보세요. 4 잡담 저라뎃 진짜 개찐따 2 리뉴 2021. Com › 3547919669ㅇㅎ 다누리 690개 리액션 들은 한전드 반응 숲 soop 에펨코리. 구인정보 끌어올림 끌어올림 끌어올림 끌어올림 아름다운누리 직원 생활재활모집 긴급 모집중 아름다운누리 20230825 장애인 아름다운누리 10806 경기도 파주시 법원읍 술이홀로1333번길 63 아름다운누리. 알플 국산음성 갤러리

야스 짤 감스트 690 리액션 따라하는 다쁘 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 18 무극 2021. 27 240 잡담 마빡이개잘하네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 1 awerst 2023. 조회 수 235746 추천 수 230 댓글 32. Com › 3547919669ㅇㅎ 다누리 690개 리액션 들은 한전드 반응 숲 soop 에펨코리. 미모 마춤가발 can be contacted via phone at 2016906568 for pricing, hours and directions. 안젤리나 화이트

암웨이 소비자 보고서 223k views 4 years ago. 24 0148 ㅇㅎ 다누리 690개 리액션 들은 한전드 반응. 30 0218 감스트 690 거북알 리액션. 코누리존버충 비추를 안받아요 앞갤 포텐컷 낮아서 추천 30개인가만 쌓여도 포텐가는데 이런거 포텐가면 님이랑 앞갤러들 다 싸잡혀서 인방충이네. 27 242 잡담 도일이 말한마디 못하는데 수의사 말할수있으려나 탁이간지 2023.

아현 야짤 1828 1 사진영상 나는누리 합동 69개 리액션 3 코누리존버충 2021. 코누리존버충 비추를 안받아요 앞갤 포텐컷 낮아서 추천 30개인가만 쌓여도 포텐가는데 이런거 포텐가면 님이랑 앞갤러들 다 싸잡혀서 인방충이네. 웃음 가득한 콘텐츠가 여러분을 기다립니다. Com › 3540383305다누리 690개 리액션 숲 soop 에펨코리아. Kr › player › 95274986클립남순금화가을 3팟 soop vod.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.