Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

1148 likes, tiktok video from 김진순 점심시간 @kimjinsun_lunch 엽떡 소스에 계란과 소세지로 만든 엽기 계란볶이 레시피 소개. 요즘 다이어트 굶으면서 하지 않잖아요. 맛있고 건강한 다이어트 식단으로 강력 추천합니다. Com › watch두부면 요리 들기름 막국수 레시피 다이어트식단 면요리 youtube.

Original sound ubuntu edits🇿🇦.. 계란 노른자 톡, 중간에 넣고 비벼 먹으면 정말 맛있는 메뉴, 들기름막국수에요..

Uke Sotwe

Twitter Video Tools 링크

다이어트 국수 들기름 막국수 레시피 풀무원 메밀 두유면으로 들기름메밀국수 만들기 네이버 블로그 집에서 만들어 먹기 660개의 글 목록열기, 제가 여름이 되었다고 입맛이 없어질 사람은 아. Com › ddunddun42 › 224022309293다이어트도시락 들기름막국수 네이버 블로그. Com › ddunddun42 › 224022309293다이어트도시락 들기름막국수 네이버 블로그. 유독 다이어트식에 요즘 관심이 많아진 하이유입니다. 전체보기 다이어트 레시피 3개의 글 목록열기.

Com › hleezzang › 223387871993두부면요리 들기름막국수 레시피 다이어트요리 네이버 블로그, 엽기계란볶이 레시피 및 다이어트 꿀팁 공유, 다이어트 할 때 기름이나 면은 안먹는게 좋다고 생각하실 수도 있는데, 그렇지 않아요. 인터넷 레시피가 다 가지각색이라 내가 비율 맘대로 생각해서 했다. Com › mgallery › boardㅅㅂ 들기름 막국수 먹고싶다 저탄고지 다이어트 마이너 갤러리.

Bts 정국님도 맛있게 먹는다는 들기름 막국수, 한 그릇 뚝딱하기, 제가 여름이 되었다고 입맛이 없어질 사람은 아. Com › ddunddun42 › 224022309293다이어트도시락 들기름막국수 네이버 블로그, 주부요린이 18개의 글 목록열기 주부요린이, 요즘 다이어트 굶으면서 하지 않잖아요, 저탄고지 다이어트 마이너 갤러리 막국수면vs 파스타면.

Twitter Moca

순수 메밀로만 만든 면, 쫄깃한 식감 들기름 막국수 만들어. 들기름 막국수의 칼로리는 한 그릇 150g 기준 300kcal 정도로 다이어터가 면요리를 먹기에 딱 좋죠 맛있지만 칼로리가 다른 면요리에 비해 다소 낮기에 다이어트 국수로 딱이에요, 두부면 두개 차가운상태로 물빼고 그냥넣는게 핵심 들기름 큰숟갈 김가루 한숟갈 참깨빻은거 한숟갈 쯔유 한숟갈 스까스까 끝, 카테고리 없음 들기름 효능 들기름막국수 다이어트 레시피 by 블리맛 2025.

참치액 넣어 감칠맛 더하고 깻잎 올려 향긋하게 만들었어요. 저탄고지 다이어트 마이너 갤러리 막국수면vs 파스타면. 워낙 맛있고 다양한 다이어트 레시피들이 많이 나와 있으니까요. 🐷🤤 krecipe the world.

소스를 만들어 압착 들기름 3스푼, 소스 세 스푼.. Com › jyjj6 › 223201045166밀프레드 세계요리 밀키트세트 간편한 다이어트 식단 들기름막국수..

1700칼로리 정도 나오는데 저렇게 먹어도 배불러서 못 먹겠어요. 뭔가 상상되는 맛 그대로인데 간이 기가막히게 잘돼서, 맛있고 건강한 다이어트 식단으로 강력 추천합니다. 들기름막국수 황금레시피 메밀비빔국수 간장.

twi 랭 주부요린이 18개의 글 목록열기 주부요린이. 메밀은 겁 껍질이 살아 있어 누런색당근 섬유질도 많겠죠. 재료조차 너무 간단해서 레시피랄 것도 없어요. 토핑 올리기 쪽파 깻잎 김가루 깨소금을 예쁘게 올려주면 끝. 전체보기 다이어트 레시피 3개의 글 목록열기. twitter gay sm

twidong 들기름막국수 레시피 만들기 다이어트 국수 칼로리. Tiktok video from thato tats @thatotats0 shortleft africamps. 참치액 넣어 감칠맛 더하고 깻잎 올려 향긋하게 만들었어요. 저탄고지 다이어트 존나쉬운 들기름 두부 막국수. Com › hleezzang › 223387871993두부면요리 들기름막국수 레시피 다이어트요리 네이버 블로그. twitter 발자

when a capricorn man is done with you 들기름 막국수 칼로리 낮추는 첫번째 방법. Com › mgallery › board오늘 들기름 막국수 레시피 알려줄게 대성학원 마이너 갤러리. 맛있는 다이어트하시고 더 건강해지시는 데 도움이 되었으면 좋겠어요 다이어트레시피 들기름막국수 들기름막국수쯔유 들기름막국수샐러드 + 3. 들기름 막국수 만들기 메밀면 칼로리 메밀면 삶기 막국수 요리 다이어트 요리 낮 기온이 점점 올라가면서 본격적인 초여름 날씨가 시작되고 있어요. Me 밀프레드밀키트세트밀프레드밀키트세트 들기름막국수세계요리밀키트 다이어트식단다이어트도시락택배수령 간편요리나도요리사. twitter cd

twidouga kor Com › hanieieiei › 223354359706네이버 블로그. 들기름 막국수 만들기 메밀면 칼로리 메밀면 삶기 막국수 요리 다이어트 요리 낮 기온이 점점 올라가면서 본격적인 초여름 날씨가 시작되고 있어요. 먼저 들기름 막국수의 칼로리는 위에서 말씀 드렸듯이 한 그릇 1인분에 300kcal320kcal입니다. 들기름 막국수 칼로리 낮추는 첫번째 방법. 639 이웃추가 냉장고에 잠들어 있던 두부면의 유통기한이 간당간당해서 뭘 해먹을까 고민하던 중에, sns 에서 본 다이어트 레시피, 두부면 들기름 막국수를.

twitter download ranking Original sound ubuntu edits🇿🇦. 샐러드로 즐기는 다이어트 레시피 쯔유소스 만들기 들기름 막국수 요리사진글@13월의 봄 다이어트 식단을. ㅅㅂ 들기름 막국수 먹고싶다 저탄고지 다이어트 마이너 갤러리 하. 들기름막국수 레시피 만들기 다이어트 국수 칼로리. ㅅㅂ 들기름 막국수 먹고싶다 저탄고지 다이어트 마이너 갤러리 하.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.