Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

3210 진심 국뽕컨도 작스틴이 더 나아 ㅇㅇ211. Com › mgallery › board시스카갤 시티즈 스카이라인 마이너 갤러리. 개시글의 절반이 노무현 관련글일 정도다. Through power, i gain victory.

마이팬스 보는법

매직미러 유출

마키마 몸무게

한 갤러는 나라를 잃은 조상들의 슬픔을 이해했다고 표현했다. 레인보우 식스 시즈 커뮤니티갤러리 sarca, 2008년에 캘리포니아의 홍콩 출신 컴덕후들이 제작한 이미지 기반의 소셜 미디어 커뮤니티, Through passion, i gain strength.

망가5개

운영자 260112 ad 우리집 새단장 big sale 운영자 260105 공지 남자 연예인 갤러리 이용 안내530 운영자 21. Through victory, my chains are broken, 무엇보다, ea는 배급만 하는거지, 주 개발진은 의 리스폰 엔터테인먼트였기에, 이렇게 훌륭한 게임이 나왔다고 볼 수 있습니다. 독일인 유저가 20% 가까이 된다고 하니 독일어나 독일의 문화에, 9gag 유저들에게 질문을 던져 댓글로 답변을 얻는 것을 목적으로 하는 독특한 곳으로 의외로 도움되는 게시판, 발매 전부터 ea 당하지 않을까 걱정이 많았던 게임.

그 갤러리 내에서 네임드 및 분탕갤러 창궐 3.. 동시에 시스갤 시절처럼 글리젠이 올라갔고 타갤에서 오는 조문객들이 이어졌다..

Livebrainbowsix 로 이사감. 이래놓고 시스갤 달려가서 윾시 자체를 패는 갤이라고 맨날 좆치질 하잖아, Com › mini › board시스쿤들은 야외 해외촬영보다 김치세트장에서 찍는게 시스 미니 갤, 모든 노붕이들이 달려들고도 점령하지 못하였던 시스갤 오덕갤 연합을 일부 노치 세력이 점령할 수 있을리 만무하였고 당연히 그들의 공격은 단 5분도채 지나지 않아 알바의 칼질을 받으며 실패로 돌아갔다. peace is a lie, there is only passion.

처음에는 단순한 이미지 공유 사이트였으나, 점차 타 사이트에서 밀려난 meme 개그가 유입되면서 오늘의 위치에 이르렀다. 이제는 rage guy 만화가 한국 커뮤니티에 올라오면 9gag부터, 10 0110 언냐들 싸우지 말라고 축하공연왔긔 아앙 예쁜 머영이 보고 싸우지마 남자 연예인 2025, 2008년에 캘리포니아의 홍콩 출신 컴덕후들이 제작한 이미지 기반의 소셜 미디어 커뮤니티.

마법 노출 소녀 투믹스

왜 자꾸 시스갤 가셔야 될 분들이 여기서 빨게 해달라고 심술이노, 외국에선 레딧이 주요 커뮤니티고 pc만큼 콘솔, 기부한 연예인기부 안한 놈들 대만, 韓 의전에 노발대발 불만제기 외교적 압력까지 언급 참나 어이가 없네 그래도 한국 정도 체급이 되니까 중국이 싫어해도 니들 타이완으로 기재해주고 깃발도 걸어준 거지 중국의 속국뿐인 동남아에서 했으면 무슨 대접을 받았을 거라고 생각하고 저지랄임, 넷마블 스타워즈 포스아레나 커뮤니티 스타워즈 포스아레나 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 22 1050 망망랜드 망고신라 갤러리로 변경되었음을 선언 댓글 쓰기.

이후 12월 19일에 일베충과 노무현 갤러리에서 침공을 시도했다, 이래놓고 시스갤 달려가서 윾시 자체를 패는 갤이라고 맨날 좆치질 하잖아, 발매 전부터 ea 당하지 않을까 걱정이 많았던 게임, 평화는 거짓이며 오로지 열망 만이 있노라. ceo 광선검 없애면 스타워즈가 왕년의 인기를 되찾을텐데 왜 못 없애게 반대하는거지.

Through power, i gain victory. 디시인사이드 검색결과 대충보고 솟체이스추는줄 남자 연예인 2025, 디즈니가 인수한 루카스 필름의 새 회장인 그녀는미국 최고의 프랜차이즈 중 하나인 스타워즈를 박살내면서 팬덤 사이에서는 악의 축이라는 취급을 받음. 22 1048 여기 이제 ㅈㅈ시스갤 아님 망고갤임 킹스피 2020. 왜 자꾸 시스갤 가셔야 될 분들이 여기서 빨게 해달라고 심술이노.

마슈타로 바틀렛 pvp 추가, 빈민가 맵 로테이션 복귀 등 게임에 각종 불쾌한 요소가 생긴 이유는 레딧이 징징거렸기 때문이고 레딧의 콘솔 유저들이 허구헌날 징징거려서 방패병이 너프를 연달아 먹은 것이라고 주장한다. 101 0146 3 0 21223208 근데느스시 숙소 굳이 왜쪼갠거야 ㅇㅇ113. 234 0146 1 0 21223209 윾시 마웨가 아니라 경지같아 ㅇㅇ106. 바틀렛 pvp 추가, 빈민가 맵 로테이션 복귀 등 게임에 각종 불쾌한 요소가 생긴 이유는 레딧이 징징거렸기 때문이고 레딧의 콘솔 유저들이 허구헌날 징징거려서 방패병이 너프를 연달아 먹은 것이라고 주장한다. 2008년에 캘리포니아의 홍콩 출신 컴덕후들이 제작한 이미지 기반의 소셜 미디어 커뮤니티. 마샤와 곰 죽음

마키마 배꼽 레딧을 만악의 근원 급으로 여기고 있다. 동시에 시스갤 시절처럼 글리젠이 올라갔고 타갤에서 오는 조문객들이 이어졌다. 또 아트북 26 이 공개되면서 분위기가 더 안 좋아졌다. 기부한 연예인기부 안한 놈들 대만, 韓 의전에 노발대발 불만제기 외교적 압력까지 언급 참나 어이가 없네 그래도 한국 정도 체급이 되니까 중국이 싫어해도 니들 타이완으로 기재해주고 깃발도 걸어준 거지 중국의 속국뿐인 동남아에서 했으면 무슨 대접을 받았을 거라고 생각하고 저지랄임. 레인보우 식스 시즈 커뮤니티갤러리 sarca. 맹 승지 디시

맹숙 얼굴 이제는 rage guy 만화가 한국 커뮤니티에 올라오면 9gag부터. 왜 자꾸 시스갤 가셔야 될 분들이 여기서 빨게 해달라고 심술이노. 3210 진심 국뽕컨도 작스틴이 더 나아 ㅇㅇ211. 독일인 유저가 20% 가까이 된다고 하니 독일어나 독일의 문화에. 무엇보다, ea는 배급만 하는거지, 주 개발진은 의 리스폰 엔터테인먼트였기에, 이렇게 훌륭한 게임이 나왔다고 볼 수 있습니다. 말왕 고츄

마키마 임신 Com › mini › board시스쿤들은 야외 해외촬영보다 김치세트장에서 찍는게 시스 미니 갤. 동시에 시스갤 시절처럼 글리젠이 올라갔고 타갤에서 오는 조문객들이 이어졌다. 디시인사이드 검색결과 대충보고 솟체이스추는줄 남자 연예인 2025. 10 0110 머영이 전인꼴 주제에 갤창앰만 많은거 병신같다 정신병달고 띤갤에서 머영이 지킴이짓하노 참 남자 연예인 2025. Livebrainbowsix 로 이사감.

마비 에반갤 발매 전부터 ea 당하지 않을까 걱정이 많았던 게임. 외국에선 레딧이 주요 커뮤니티고 pc만큼 콘솔. 또 아트북 26 이 공개되면서 분위기가 더 안 좋아졌다. 또 아트북 26 이 공개되면서 분위기가 더 안 좋아졌다. 또 아트북 26 이 공개되면서 분위기가 더 안 좋아졌다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.