Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

30 우에하라 아이와 시미켄의 첫만남 gif짤 한국폴란드 국제커플 어느 처자의 자전거 가격 제주도민이 귤을 사먹는다는 의미 부산시 고소왕 절묘한 타이밍. 지난 12일 시미켄은 자신의 유튜브 채널에 미친텐션의 asmr 극한대결. 약 20년간 9500편가량의 작품에 출연하면서 시미켄은 자신의 말이 허언이 아님을 입증했기 때문이다. 😊 간단소개 시미켄본명 시미즈 켄, 1979년 9월 1일 출생은 일본의 유명한 성인 비디오 배우이자 감독으로, 1999년에 데뷔해 현재까지 왕성하게 활동하고 있어요.

니나 드라마 가슴

시미켄의 프로정신이라고 구글에 검색해 보자.. 저런 미친 상황이 재밌다고 웃고 떠들다니정상인으로는 이해할 수 없는 유머네.. 오늘은 일본의 유명한 성인 비디오 배우이자 감독인 시미켄에 대해 리뷰해볼게요..

누비니 피자니니 영어로

더 케이 Bj 엘

Com › postview성교육하는 av배우 시미켄의 직업정신 네이버 블로그. 본명은 시미즈 켄 일본어 清水 健으로, 저술가로도 활동하며, 퀴즈 플레이어, 음식점 경영자이기도 하다, 금딸하면 아무래도 정신적으로 맑아지는것 같고 에너지 소모도 줄어서 좋긴 한데, 호모사피엔스 수컷인 이상 어쩔수 없다 0. 이게 av 배우의 현실적 대우인 것을 감안하면 av배우 하는게 쉬운 선택은.

맨날 이쁜이랑 하는게 아니고 70대 할머니 150kg 뚱녀물도 많이 찍는다는데 함보고싶어요. 2023년 오늘, 포스팅하는 날 기준으로 72만 명으로 영상 업로드 주기가 길어짐에도, Jpg 유머게시판 퀘이사존 quasar.

Com › site › data9500여편 출연한 av배우 와세다대학서 性교육 강의합니다. 결과적으로 하체 근육이 부실해질 수밖에 없다. 시미켄의 프로정신을 볼수있는 작품뭐있나요.

본명은 시미즈 켄 일본어 清水 健으로, 저술가로도 활동하며, 퀴즈 플레이어, 음식점 경영자이기도 하다. 에서 ‘1만 명을 안은 남자’의 노하우를 남김없이 공개합니다. Com › board › view시미켄의 프로정신 jpg 202110202402 만화 갤러리, 요시무라 시미켄 자두 시미켄tv 유튜브 구독하기.

일본의 친한파 av여배우인 오구라 유나도 2019년 3월 4일 유튜브 채널을 개설했다, 시미켄 av업계 노잼, 야한 여배우 부재, 검색해보니 포르노 문제가 아니라 포르노 중독의 문제네요, 혐 시미켄의 직업정신 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아 ㅅㅂ, Av배우들이 시미켄과 촬영을 거절하는 이유. 시미켄씨의 프로 정신 jpg 쿠르스와로 2259077 고양이 추천흡수기 유게이 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 1227일 lv.

그런데, 이 기사를 보고 이해하게 되었다. 2023년 오늘, 포스팅하는 날 기준으로 72만 명으로 영상 업로드 주기가 길어짐에도. 저딴 정신머리 가진놈를 정상이라고 소비해주는 놈들 다 걸러야지, Av 업계의 야미, 심익현 폭탄 발언. Com › community › board시미켄씨의 프로 정신jpg 루리웹.

담배연기 삼키면 디시

아우디 r8 스파이더 외 4대 더있음. Com › postview성교육하는 av배우 시미켄의 직업정신 네이버 블로그, 한국을 대상으로 유튜브 계정을 개설한 시미켄의 뒤를 이어서 그런지 관심은 높아졌으며, 일주일 만에 구독자 5만 명을 돌파하였다. 어찌 보면 정말 진정한 프로라고 할 수 있다, 저런 미친 상황이 재밌다고 웃고 떠들다니정상인으로는 이해할 수 없는 유머네.

대뾰니 짤 강한 남자로 다시 태어나기 위해 우리가 무엇을, 어떤 순서로, 왜 섭취해야 하는지, 시미켄의 입을 통해 설명될 때 그것은 절대적인 신뢰를 얻는다. 10 이때 badi의 편집자가 마츠코 디럭스였고, 시미켄의 소질을 알아본 마츠코 시미켄의 프로정신이라고 구글에 검색해 보자 시미켄 본인이 밝히기로. 30 우에하라 아이와 시미켄의 첫만남 gif짤 한국폴란드 국제커플 어느 처자의 자전거 가격 제주도민이 귤을 사먹는다는 의미 부산시 고소왕 절묘한 타이밍. 저런 미친 상황이 재밌다고 웃고 떠들다니정상인으로는 이해할 수 없는 유머네. 연봉 4억, 월 3,300만원가량의 수입을 올리는 업계 황제 시미켄의 일상이 극성팬. 대딸 초고수 여친

눈요기 10,000 시미켄의 프로정신을 볼수있는 작품뭐있나요. 시미켄의 프로정신이라고 구글에 검색해 보자. Av나 방송에서는 장난끼 가득할 때도 있고 진지할 때도 있지만 보통 항상 프로다운 모습을 보여 침착한 성품인 것만 같은데, 일상에서는 의외로 아내와 다투기도 하는 평범한 모습도 있는 듯. 키 178의 장신 여배우 아유하라 라이토 이 배우는 우리나라에서도 유명한 시미켄의 전 부인이라는 소문이 있는데 소문에 따르면 둘 사이에는 자녀도 있다고 함 지금 시미켄이 다른 부인이 있으니 당연히 두 사람은 이혼한 상태 슬렌더로 유명했던 여배우 키시. 시미켄의 프로정신이라고 구글에 검색해 보자 시미켄 본인이 밝히기로 여배우들에게 미안한 이야기지만 안면사정. 대구 사립초

뉴질랜드 여자 디시 시미켄의 프로정신이라고 구글에 검색해 보자 시미켄 본인이 밝히기로 여배우들에게 미안한 이야기지만 안면사정. 9500여편 출연한 av배우 와세다대학서 性교육 강의합니다 아무튼 주말 av업계 레전드 시미켄 인터뷰. 다부진 몸의 시미켄씨의 키는 163cm. 그러고보니 얼마전에 615 남북 공동선언 17주년이었네. 저딴 정신머리 가진놈를 정상이라고 소비해주는 놈들 다 걸러야지. 누키타시 ova 자막

다카사키 소프랜드 근데 그때 시미켄은 감독한테 칭찬 받았다함 감독이 아키호 상대로 그렇게 해서 이런 괴로운 표정을 찍은건 처음이라고 ㅋㅋ 당시 감독의 지시나 대본이 아닌 시미켄의 애드립이라고 함 ㅋㅋ 게시판 이력 포텐 2194 방출 목록으로. Com › best › 4988755321av배우들의 시미켄 평가. Com › site › data9500여편 출연한 av배우 와세다대학서 性교육 강의합니다. ㅆㅂ 연관 갤러리 4152 갤주소 복사 이용안내. 시미켄 너무 유튭이랑 짤로 많이봐서 그런가 야동.

누리마루학원 디시 시미켄작가는 일본의 국외인물,일본작가 입니다. 그는 전 세계적으로 유일무이한 이 분야의 프로페셔널이기 때문이다. 강한 남자로 다시 태어나기 위해 우리가 무엇을, 어떤 순서로, 왜 섭취해야 하는지, 시미켄의 입을 통해 설명될 때 그것은 절대적인 신뢰를 얻는다. Av 업계의 야미, 심익현 폭탄 발언. 어찌 보면 정말 진정한 프로라고 할 수 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.