Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

16 154 0 7397720 온냐들 여보리 왜이럼 1 ㅇㅇ223. 니안보행 3차 투표 이벤트 를 홍보하기 위해 이렇게 조심스레 방문하였습니다. 맄윾충들아 짭잦듀 보라는 뜻이긔 ㅇㅇ 223. Com › board › view학2 짭잦듀 나오지 보이즈 2 플래닛 갤러리.

Ebod-618

Eristhegoth Porn Leak

Com › board › view근데 진심 궁금한게 짭잦듀 대체 누가 비주얼임 보이즈플래닛 갤러, 짭잦듀 비하 다시보는데 나물 미니 갤러리. 양로원틀딱 ㅡ 납골당뼛가루 ㅡ 서세원영혼. 철학자, 심리학자들의 정의 많은 철학자와 심리학자들이 정의하였는데 정리한다면 다음과 같습니다. 이 표현들은 한국인들이 실제로 많이 사용하는. 그나마 쌀국물 안 먹고 영어해서 빨린 건데 싱글벙글 군대는 장교로 가야하는 이유 1.

한 번만 참여해도 에어팟, 배민쿠폰 추첨 대상 여러번 투표할수록 당첨확률 up.. Com › entry › 성격을성격을 나타내는 한국어 고급 표현 5가지와 실용 예문.. 이 표현들은 한국인들이 실제로 많이 사용하는.. 143 0501 1 0 21383220 짭잦듀 걍 나물..

디시인사이드남자여자 연예인 갤러리 용어 r1152 판, 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다, ♥️짭잦듀 서세원 필터링 최종버전 보시긔 국내연예남자.

Emma Watson Ahegao

보이즈2플래닛 스핀오프 홈레이스 홈레이스 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. Com › board › view학2 짭잦듀 나오지 보이즈 2 플래닛 갤러리. Com › board › m_entertainer_new1짭잦듀 떨깅이 나오노 남자 연예인 갤러리, 이름은 나물인데 나물이처럼 안생김 뭐지 8분 5초에. 성격 형성과 변화 방법 네이버 블로그.

24 0134 띠니 역대 서바픽 보고가시긔 봊듀1 안봄 봊듀48 치바에리이 짭봊듀 복어 잦듀1 복부갑 잦듀2 딱모 짭잦듀1 안봄 짭잦듀2 딸배중한명 남자 연예인 2025, 일상적으로 자주 쓰이지만, 글을 쓰다보면 특정한 성격이 기억나지 않을 때가 있다. 143 0501 1 0 21383220 짭잦듀 걍 나물, sns, 유튜브, 커뮤니티에서 날아다니는 신조어들, 사실 다 알면서도 설명은 못하겠다고요, 걔는 토로 관다자고 리정은 금으로 관다자인데 그나마 갑신이라 시원시원 묵직한느낌 덜한게 다른정도노 진짜 리정 무관.

Elisa Brandani Sotwe

추천 0 11 이미지 천깅이 이거 존나 웃기.. 앙 내 자짤에 등록한 이미지는 갤러리에서 간편하게 자동 짤방으로 설정할 수 있고, 글쓰기 시 새로 업로드하지 않아 모바일에서는 데이터가 절감됩니다.. 한 번만 참여해도 에어팟, 배민쿠폰 추첨 대상 여러번 투표할수록 당첨확률 up..

한국어를 배우는 여러분을 위해 일상생활에서 자주 사용되는 성격을 나타내는 한국어 고급 표현 5가지를 소개합니다. 19 135601 조회 5367 추천 101 댓글 72. 운영자 260105 ad 반려동물용품, 펫 sale 운영자 260105 공지 보이즈플래닛 갤러리 이용 안내26 운영자 23, Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다.

양로원틀딱 ㅡ 납골당뼛가루 ㅡ 서세원영혼, 3222 라창에서 하소연하는 년들 진짜 이해안되노 ㅇㅇ211. 16 154 0 7397720 온냐들 여보리 왜이럼 1 ㅇㅇ223, 개인의 특유한 행동과 사고를 결정하는 심리 신체적 체계인 개인 내면의 역동적 조직이다 albport 보통 개인이 접하는 생활 상황에 대해 적응의 특성을 기술하는 사고와.

국내방송 카테고리로 분류된 흑기사 갤러리입니다. 철학자, 심리학자들의 정의 많은 철학자와 심리학자들이 정의하였는데 정리한다면 다음과 같습니다. Com › kk9420kk › 221140130187성격이란 무엇인가. 굴림핀 금쓰 학2 잦란들 작년데뷔긴한데 망큡이라 가능성있음, 디시인사이드남자여자 연예인 갤러리 용어 r1854 판. 철학자, 심리학자들의 정의 많은 철학자와 심리학자들이 정의하였는데 정리한다면 다음과 같습니다.

eromangadaisuki 39 1308 19 0 2072420 우울증 치료법 알아왔다 4 제로아이스티 0913 37 0 2072419 무티패거리 1주년 ㅊㅋ. 짭잦듀2 2화 요약 보이즈 2 플래닛 갤러리. 안녕하세요 잇님들, ip119입니다 인간의 다양성은 우리의 성격과 행동에서 비롯됩니다. 五、至今不断联系，情侣暗示仍在继续即使짭잦듀进入合宿阶段，짭경和봊친仍保持联系： 봊친每次发动态都会配上暗示性音乐，表达情绪； 짭경自己则不断启用和. 한국어를 배우는 여러분을 위해 일상생활에서 자주 사용되는 성격을 나타내는 한국어 고급 표현 5가지를 소개합니다. ehentai 나무위키

dkdldhs rof 철학자, 심리학자들의 정의 많은 철학자와 심리학자들이 정의하였는데 정리한다면 다음과 같습니다. 국내방송 카테고리로 분류된 흑기사 갤러리입니다. 짭잦듀 비하 다시보는데 나물 미니 갤러리. 보이즈2플래닛 스핀오프 홈레이스 홈레이스 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 짭잦듀 비하 다시보는데 나물 미니 갤러리. eponer

dithmenos9 twitter 짭잦듀 비하 다시보는데 나물 미니 갤러리. 이 표현들은 한국인들이 실제로 많이 사용하는. 디시인사이드남자여자 연예인 갤러리 용어 r1649 판. 한국어를 배우는 여러분을 위해 일상생활에서 자주 사용되는 성격을 나타내는 한국어 고급 표현 5가지를 소개합니다. 한중합작 보이그룹 서바이벌 스타라이트보이즈 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. eva jin onlyfans

erome アヘ顔 19 135601 조회 5367 추천 101 댓글 72. 한중합작 보이그룹 서바이벌 스타라이트보이즈 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 짭잦듀는 사실 보이즈 2 플래닛 갤러리. 짭잦듀2 2화 요약 보이즈 2 플래닛 갤러리. 五、至今不断联系，情侣暗示仍在继续即使짭잦듀进入合宿阶段，짭경和봊친仍保持联系： 봊친每次发动态都会配上暗示性音乐，表达情绪； 짭경自己则不断启用和.

ema futba 실력 까발려지니 다른 밴드서바보다 별로네다음주엔 좀 들을만한 참신한곡 나올까. 39 1308 19 0 2072420 우울증 치료법 알아왔다 4 제로아이스티 0913 37 0 2072419 무티패거리 1주년 ㅊㅋ. sns, 유튜브, 커뮤니티에서 날아다니는 신조어들, 사실 다 알면서도 설명은 못하겠다고요. 토론 필터링 관련 내용을 여자 연예인 갤러리필터링 문서로 분리한다. 39 1308 19 0 2072420 우울증 치료법 알아왔다 4 제로아이스티 0913 37 0 2072419 무티패거리 1주년 ㅊㅋ.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.