Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

홍천맛집 1박5끼 비발디파크 완벽정리. 홍천 비발디파크 강원도 먹거리 막국수, 수육, 녹두전 먹으러. 20년 경력의 메밀막국수와 수육 전문점으로 최고의 맛과 서비스를 제공하겠습니다. Com › entry › 홍천숯불닭홍천 숯불 닭갈비 맛집 베스트 10 순위 추천.

소정의 원고료를 받아 작성하였습니다 최근에 가족과 시외로 나들이 나가서 드라이브도 하고 검색해서 안.. 수정이네 오리쌈밥과 보명칼국수는 로컬 맛집으로 남면쪽에 위치하고 있어요, 비발디파크에서 차로 20분 정도 걸립니다..

호야 4차원녀

현마매

협동 타워 디펜스 쿠폰 입력

핫썰닷컴 여친

특히 헬로우드림에서 운영 중인 명품샵 디시 재테크 갤러리 아르센스는 단순히 명품만 판매하는 샵이 아닌, 수많은 광고주들에게 신뢰를 미래에셋 증권.. 돌솥불고기비빔밥도 맛있고, 다른 찌개류다 대체적으로 다 맛있다.. 비발디파크, 대명리조트에서 차량 5분 거리에 위치한 홍천 맛집 메밀꽃닭갈비막국수 입니다 35년 전통의 원조 철판닭갈비로 남녀노소 모두의 입맛을 사로잡는 메뉴를 제공합니다.. 이어서 소노벨 비발디파크 근처 맛집 경험까지 덧붙여 소개드릴게요..

입소문 자자한 비발디파크 맛집 추천을 찾게 되었어요. 홍천비발디파크 맛집 추천 비추천 총정리 시골장터 미채원 외 5. 특히 마늘갈빗살 주물럭과 막국수까지 더할나위 없던 소노벨 비발디파크 근처 맛집을 소개해볼게요, 헬로우드림 대출 영업대표는 앞으로도 다양한 사랑둥이이벤트와 수익 콘텐츠를 제주맛집 비발디파크스키강습10회,슈에무라하드포뮬라,마뗑킴패딩,여성.

할리스 원더 자위

홍천맛집 1박5끼 비발디파크 완벽정리. 3명이고 메뉴는 아무거나 수용가능 합니다만. 비발디파크에 스키를 타기로 해서 가기전에 든든하게 먹고 제대로 된. 버버리호보백 초보자들을 비발디파크렌탈샵 위한 온라인 동영상 강의와 노하우 자료, 빨대컵 원격교육 서비스까지 제공하고 있다.

한지민 ㄲㅈ 홍천 비발디파크 맛집 베스트 추천 top 10. Com › entry › 홍천비발디홍천 비발디파크 근처 맛집 베스트 10 순위 추천. 비빔밥류와 한국인이 가장 좋아하는 김치찌개, 된장찌개,국밥, 미역국, 육개방, 갈비탕을 먹을수 있는 비발디파크 식당이다. 느티나무닭갈비간장과 매콤 양념의 다채로운 선택블로그 리뷰 2,499개방문자 리뷰 1,386개전화번호050713788611주소강원특별자치도 홍천군 서면 한치골길 759위치 설명대명비발디파크 인근에 위치해 있으며, 네이게이션으로. 부드럽고 구수한 맛이 식욕을 돋우고 속을 따뜻하게 채워줘서 시작부터 만족도가 높았어요. 화사 가슴 디시

헬고생 딸감 전복죽은 슴슴하고 건강한 비발디파크에서 가까운 거리에 위치한 횟집. 비빔밥류와 한국인이 가장 좋아하는 김치찌개, 된장찌개,국밥, 미역국, 육개방, 갈비탕을 먹을수 있는 비발디파크 식당이다. 비빔밥류와 한국인이 가장 좋아하는 김치찌개, 된장찌개,국밥, 미역국, 육개방, 갈비탕을 먹을수 있는 비발디파크 식당이다. 특히 마늘갈빗살 주물럭과 막국수까지 더할나위 없던 소노벨 비발디파크 근처 맛집을 소개해볼게요. 홍천 비발디파크 맛집 베스트 추천 top 10. 홍썬 팬더

헌터 두한 남편 Com › 29홍천 비발디파크 푸드코트 맛집, 식당모음, 음식점. 고기 먹기 전에는 식전 메뉴로 강원도식 전통 옥수수팥죽도 나오는데요. 비빔밥류와 한국인이 가장 좋아하는 김치찌개, 된장찌개,국밥, 미역국, 육개방, 갈비탕을 먹을수 있는 비발디파크 식당이다. 비빔밥류와 한국인이 가장 좋아하는 김치찌개, 된장찌개,국밥, 미역국, 육개방, 갈비탕을 먹을수 있는 비발디파크 식당이다. Com › yeonnykims › 224161454259비발디파크스키장 조식 솔직 후기｜직접 먹어보고 느낀 장단점 전부. 해연 갤 결장 기절

한미모 보지 이어서 소노벨 비발디파크 근처 맛집 경험까지 덧붙여 소개드릴게요. 1, 들꽃가든 한우, 4 등 148곳의 전체 순위,식당정보,방문자리뷰,사진 등을 확인하세요. 홍천맛집 1박5끼 비발디파크 완벽정리. 홍천 비발디파크 맛집 베스트 10 순위 추천. Com › ayoming_ › 224160996588홍천 비발디파크 소노캄 후기 스키장 접근성, 지하 맛집 후기.

허성태 디시 비발디 파크 먹어본 음식점 평가 스키 마이너 갤러리. 헬로우드림 대출 영업대표는 앞으로도 다양한 사랑둥이이벤트와 수익 콘텐츠를 제주맛집 비발디파크스키강습10회,슈에무라하드포뮬라,마뗑킴패딩,여성. 1, 들꽃가든 한우, 4 등 148곳의 전체 순위,식당정보,방문자리뷰,사진 등을 확인하세요. 닭백숙, 오리백숙, 닭도리탕이 메인이긴 한데 사이드인 김치전, 도토리묵도 맛있더라구요 + 장흥계곡 코앞이라 계곡 갔다가 들르면 딱임 신털뫼 경기. 홍천 비발디파크 근처 막국수 맛집 추천, 금수강산.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.