US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 14, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 14, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 14, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 14, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 14, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 14, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 14, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 14, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 14, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 14, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 14, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 14, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 14, 2026.
걸그룹 나인뮤지스의 인기멤버 현아24가 일본의 유명 av성인비디오 배우 하네다 아이22와 친분이 드러나 화제다. 우연히 알아낸 그녀의집에 가지만 제작자인 로이리에 봉변당하는 그녀를 구해주지못함에 낙심하던중 대여점을 찾은 그녀와 다시 만나는데. 현아, 日 유명 av배우 하네다 아이와 트친신기하네. Comview117997522 복사하기.
| 웹툰 작가인 ‘은혜’는 새로운 작품을 만들고 있다. | 나인뮤지스 현아가 일본 av스타 하네다 아이와의 친분설에 대해 설명했다. |
|---|---|
| 걸그룹 나인뮤지스의 인기멤버 현아24가 일본의 유명 av성인비디오 배우 하네다 아이22와 친분이 드러나 화제다. | 러시아의 syktyvkar 패션쇼에 참가한 모델이다. |
| 걸그룹 나인뮤지스의 인기멤버 현아24가 일본의 유명 av성인비디오 배우 하네다 아이22와 친분이 드러나 화제다. | Com › category › 현아현주다비. |
| 현아 무대보고 오열하는 av배우 유머움짤이슈. | 품 박어 움짤로 유명한 여자 av도 찍었었네. |
| Jpg 러시아 코미 공화국 식팁카르 сыктывкар, syktyvk. | 해줄 작품은 남편만 몰라요, 왜 하필 남편만 모를가요ㅠㅠㅋㅋ 암튼 남편만 몰라요 라는 영화에 대해서 알아볼려고요 처음에 영화를 보고서는 전혀 알지 못했지만 나중에 시간이 흐르고선 알게된 사실이. |
발넓은 현아, 일본 av배우 하네다 아이와 트친.. Com › board › 397953일본 배우, 품번 검색 avdbs..
주말이지만 쉬지않고선 블로그에 글을 올리려고 왔네요ㅎㅎ 오늘 여러분들에게 소개를. 오랄할때 모자이크 되어있는 남자배우 성기도 가짜인데다 옷으로 대부분 가려져있어서 대충 봐도 어색함. 웹툰 작가인 ‘은혜’는 새로운 작품을 만들고 있다.
Com › actor › view류현아 유리 우리 씨네폭스 cinefox, 최근 온라인 커뮤니티 게시판에는 현아가 지난 7월 하네다와 주고받은 트위터 멘션이 공개됐다, 지난주 물밀듯이 밀려드러온 신작때문인지 아직까지는 조용한 하루입니다.
유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2024. 현아 스포츠서울 걸그룹 나인뮤지스 멤버 현아의 의외 인맥이 눈길을 끈다. 현아, 日 유명 av배우 하네다 아이와 트친신기하네, 사진하네다 아이왼쪽트위터, 현아 트위터오른쪽 뉴스핌장주연 인턴기자 나인뮤지스의 멤버 현아24가 일본의 av배우와 트친트위터 친구으로.
감독배우 류현아 김미연 정넘쳐 백세리 최정, 최혜리나 rinachoi@newsplus. 2ne1을 좋아하는 등 한국 아이돌 그룹의 열성적인 팬으로, 지난 2012년 온라인 커뮤니티 게시판에는 현아가 지난 7월 일본의 유명 av배우 하네다 아이 22와 주고 받은 멘션이 공개됐다.
2ne1을 좋아하는 등 한국 아이돌 그룹의 열성적인 팬으로. Com › board › yeobgi품 박어 움짤로 유명한 여자 av도 찍었었네. 조회 수 4240 존나 좋아했는데 말년 개망한 배우인데 아는 애들 있냐. 우연히 알아낸 그녀의집에 가지만 제작자인 로이리에 봉변당하는 그녀를 구해주지못함에 낙심하던중 대여점을 찾은 그녀와 다시 만나는데, 또 그는 2ne1을 좋아하는 등 한국 아이돌 그룹의 열성적인 팬.
Kim inae is a south korean av actress. 하네다 아이는 지난 2008년 그라비아 모델로 데뷔해 2010년 av 배우로 전향해 현재까지 업계에서 큰 인기를 얻고 있는 배우다. 품 박어 움짤로 유명한 여자 av도 찍었었네, 한때 av계의 아이유 현아로 불렸던 스타크래프트. Comview117997522 복사하기. 나인뮤지스 현아, 日 av배우 하네다 아이와 친분 과시 의외.
하네다 아이는 2008년 그라비아 모델로 연예계에 입성한 후 2010년 일본 av업계에 데뷔했다. 메이저 영화만의 보는맛이 있다면 또 마이너만의 보는맛이 있기때문에 오늘은 마이너 작품중에 간만에 현아 작품을 들고 왔습니다. 하네다 아이는 지난 2008년 그라비아 모델로 데뷔해 2010년 av 배우로 전향해 현재까지 업계에서 큰 인기를 얻고 있는 배우다.
korean slut 지인 최혜리나 rinachoi@newsplus. 한국인은 외국에서 av찍어도 불법이기 때문에 한국 에로물처럼 카메라 각도 조절해서 실제 하는 것처럼 조작하는거지 가짜다. 현아 무대보고 오열하는 av배우 유머움짤이슈. 박세민의 개그 클럽 8화에 나온 에로배우 현아. 2021년 출시작부터는 노란색의 헤어. ldm 博多
korea solo porno 현아는 트위터에 비가 좋다는 글을 게재. 2021년 출시작부터는 노란색의 헤어. 18일 나인뮤지스 소속사 스타제국 관계자는 한 매체에 현재 하네다 아이와 나인뮤지스 현아와의 트위터 글이 화제가 되고 있는데 2008년부터 서로 알던 사이였다고 밝혔다. 지난주 물밀듯이 밀려드러온 신작때문인지 아직까지는 조용한 하루입니다. 주말이지만 쉬지않고선 블로그에 글을 올리려고 왔네요ㅎㅎ 오늘 여러분들에게 소개를. kuzu_v0 68
korean bj ai 현아, 日 유명 av배우 하네다 아이와 트친신기하네. 한국인은 외국에서 av찍어도 불법이기 때문에 한국 에로물처럼 카메라 각도 조절해서 실제 하는 것처럼 조작하는거지 가짜다. 현아, 日 유명 av배우와 친분 과시의외 인맥. 지난주 물밀듯이 밀려드러온 신작때문인지 아직까지는 조용한 하루입니다. 지난주 물밀듯이 밀려드러온 신작때문인지 아직까지는 조용한 하루입니다. lengiiiii
kuzu_v0 39 배우소개 성인영화 경력이 10년 이상된 베테랑급 배우로 일본av에서도 활동한 적이 있다. 익명 윤재 20250806 073750 신고 엉덩이가 마음에 들어 카타르시스 연희 20250604 163406 신고 역시 한국av배우 는 연희님이 제일 짱이야 카리스마 있고 섹시하고 20개 더 보기. 2021년 출시작부터는 노란색의 헤어 염색과 오른쪽 가슴 위 십자가 문양의 타투를 하고 다른 이미지를 연출하고 있다. 53gb 套图编号:0403048 套图数量:528张套图大小:1. Jpg 러시아 코미 공화국 식팁카르 сыктывкар, syktyvk.
kuzu22 현아 무대보고 오열하는 av배우 유머움짤이슈. 지난주 물밀듯이 밀려드러온 신작때문인지 아직까지는 조용한 하루입니다. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2024. 한국영화 최장 에로 시리즈의 신화 의 2016년 화려한 귀환. Com › person › p000111414맥스무비.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 14, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 14, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 14, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 14, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
파일러시아 에로배우 이리나 그리가2., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.