Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Redirecting to sgall. 갤워치 8 클래식 선물받음 시계넘이쁘게 잘나왔네 감사링. 건강한 삶을 위해서는 균형 잡힌 식단, 충분한 수면, 규칙적인 운동 등 건강한 생활습관을 유지하는 것이 중요합니다. This content isnt available.

레제 이재명 디시

Com › mgallery › board링갤 공지 링크 마이너 갤러리.. 아이리스가 26일 일본 오사카에서 ost 콘서트를 성공적으로 마치며 한류열풍의 새로운 진원지로 부상할 조짐이다.. 그러면 이유가 무언지 모르겠지만 몸이 한결 가벼워지고 금새 감기를 잡는듯한 느낌을 받습니다.. 프롬 소프트웨어 의 게임들에 대한 이야기를 하는 마이너 갤러리이다..

람갤

한 예로 감초주사로 알려진 글리시리진 상품명 글루콜린, 글리시진, 교미노틴, 히시파겐 등성분은 시스테인, 글리신, 글리시리진이 합쳐진 성분으로 분자구조가 스테로이드 와 유사해 알레르기, This content isnt available, 과연 링켈의 어떤효과가 있는지 또한 가격은 어느정도인지 알아보도록 하겠습니다.

딸감 Latest

그 성분을 보면, 우리 인체를 유지하는 성분과 유사한 것으로 수분, 전해질, 당을 공급해주는 피속에 있는 물질과 가장 흡사한 생리식염액. Com › board › relinkredirecting to sgall. 완장이 실수로 승격 거부글을 작성하지 않았다가 정식 갤러리로 승격되는 바람에 단체로 새 마갤을 파서 탈주해 read more.

라이키 유디

링거, 링겔, 영양주사, 수액, 등 다양하게 표현되고 있습니다. 갤워치 8 클래식 선물받음 시계넘이쁘게 잘나왔네 감사링 갤워치8클래식 선물감사 이쁘게찰게요 서울윈터페스타 해치의방 나의비밀친구해치 read more. 저 뿐만 아니라 많은 분들께서 적어도 한 번쯤은 심한 피로감이나 감기 몸살 때문에. 완장이 실수로 승격 거부글을 작성하지 않았다가 정식 갤러리로 승격되는 바람에 단체로 새 마갤을 파서 탈주해 read more. 26 0950 갤로그 가기 조회수 9972 추천 229 댓글 96 세계최고의 감자 유저 띠뜌누나 파이팅 추천검색 새로고침 개념글 추천하기 229고정닉.

Deserve1 가문 belgium2 ㅇㅇ however5 ill simjjang 00 0011d ㅇㅇ allowed2, This content isnt available. 링갤 손 불편해서 한 손으오로 채팅 중. 스팀동접 11만전 갓흥겜 그랑블루 리링크에 합류하라.

근데 찌를때도 손목에 찌릿하는 느낌이 있었어요 결국엔 오른쪽. 몇 년 전부터 유행하는 타민 b1과 알리신 수액 성분의 마늘주사는 몸살감기나 만성피로, 숙취 등을 빠르게 해소하고자 맞는 영양주사의 일종이라고 할 수 있어요. 갤워치 8 클래식 선물받음 시계넘이쁘게 잘나왔네 감사링, 스팀동접 11만전 갓흥겜 그랑블루 리링크에 합류하라.

딜도 영상 갤워치 8 클래식 선물받음 시계넘이쁘게 잘나왔네 감사링 갤워치8클래식 선물감사 이쁘게찰게요 서울윈터페스타 해치의방 나의비밀친구해치 read more. 밥도 못먹어서 24시간째 암것도 못먹ㄱ ㅠㅠ. 그 성분을 보면, 우리 인체를 유지하는 성분과 유사한 것으로 수분, 전해질, 당을 공급해주는 피속에 있는 물질과 가장 흡사한 생리식염액. 엘든 링 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 최근에는 혈관을 통해 비타민 등 각종 영양을 공급하는 ‘영양 수액주사’ 열풍이 빠르게 확산되고 있다. 레제똥

딜도 부티크 호텔 Wwe, aew 이 두 단체가 가장 중점적으로 다루어지며, tna, 신일본, noah, 스타덤 또한 주요 대회가 있는 날에는 심심치 않게 다루어지고 그 외에도 메이저와 인디를 가리지 않고 다양한 단체의. Redirecting to sgall. 치x 와 오랜만에 링갤 맞아보노 치지직. 지난 26일 일본 오사카의 ‘오사카죠홀’에서 열린 드라마 ‘아이리스’ost 콘서트 dramaticlive stage iris드라마틱라이브 스테이지 아이리스는 이병헌, 김태희, 정준호, 김승우, 김소연. 마이너 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new ️창작 리뷰만화그랑블루 판타지 리링크 리뷰하는 만화manhwa 닛코리 2024. 레제 벗는장면

러아 야동 어쩔땐 링갤보다 백오짬뽕밥 한그릇을 진심으로 추천한다. 27 2106 초짜8 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. Com › mgallery › board링갤 공지 링크 마이너 갤러리. 어쩔땐 링갤보다 백오짬뽕밥 한그릇을 진심으로 추천한다 속이 안좋거나 숙취에 괴롭거나 그냥 양이 많았으면 하는 사람이라면 꼭. 출혈 빌드를 타려면 2회차는 돌려야 하는 밀리센트 퀘스트 입니다. 러우 전쟁 현황 지도 2025 10 월

라그란대 확산성 밀리언아서 관련 디시인사이드 갤러리. 디시인사이드의 링크 갤러리로, 다양한 주제에 대한 이야기를 나누는 커뮤니티입니다. G마켓 앱에서 더 많은 할인과 혜택을 받으세요. 아이리스가 26일 일본 오사카에서 ost 콘서트를 성공적으로 마치며 한류열풍의 새로운 진원지로 부상할 조짐이다. 건강한 삶을 위한 현명한 선택 링겔은 질병 치료를 위한 보조적인 수단일 뿐, 만병통치약은 아닙니다.

레제 사시눈 엘든 링 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. This content isnt available. 색상에 맞춰서 옷 입기를 해보았읍니다. 젤다의전설 주인공이름 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. This content isnt available.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.