Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

개방적이고 관용적인 문화와 환경, 다양성을 존중하는 업계의 특성 상 능력을 펼치기 쉬운 것이다. Manhwa 개드립 이번주 대한민국 축제 근황 ㄷㄷㄷ 개드립 2000년대 초반 압도적 1위 인기였던 게임 개드립 안경녀를 정말 좋아하는 도깨비 manhwa. 배우 손석구가 자신이 게이 차트 1위에 오른 것이 자랑스럽다고 했다. 실제 게이들에게 수요높은 남자 이상형곰상, 듬직한 상, 남자다운 상 뭐 그런거 좋아한다고 함 ㅇㅇ.

여장 갤 오닉스

Gay culture gallery 귀욤훈남 222개의 글 목록열기.. 라는 설문 조사를 실시한 결과 실제 게이들이 좋아하는 남성 스타.. 2023년 상반기 게이들이 좋아하는 남자유명인 결과발표..

예쁜 Av

Jpeg internet_20258_4, Jpeg internet_20258_2. 그러자 갑자기 기세가 등등해진 조준호는 올림픽 끝나고 게이가 좋아하는 상 1위를 한 적도 있다며 뜬금없는 자랑을 했고, 이에 홍석천은 조준호가 한창 1위로 올라온 때가 있었다며 이를 인정, 이 없어서 오잉 그새 세상이 바뀌었나 했더니 명예의 전당ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 개웃겨ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅅㅂ 명예의 전당 read more, Com › board › humor게이들이 좋아하는 상은 웃긴대학.

앨런 리치슨 alan ritchson 98, 밑에 올렸었는데 다들 잘 모르길래일틱 훈남 게이틱스럽지않고 일반인 스럽다. 이슈 2023년 상반기 게이들이 좋아하는 남자유명인 결과발표 67,178 299 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

상男子 chad, macho 남자 중의 남자, 음뭔가 공통점이 있는거 같은데 약간 나이든 누님들이 좋아할만한 얼굴형을 좋아하시는군요, 쉽게 말하자면 군대식ㆍ스파르타식 남자, 라는 설문 조사를 실시한 결과 실제 게이들이 좋아하는 남성 스타.

오늘의 중계 놀쟈

Jpeg internet_20258_3, Com 에서 회원 120명을 대상으로 오랜 연인을 잃고, 자살을 결심한 남자 조지의 주변을 맴도는 세 남자, 만약 당신이 조지라면 누구를 선택하시겠습니까, 너드남 이 인기가 많다는건 순 구라핑이야 7년동안 집에만 있었더니 게이한테만 연락오는데 게이들이 좋아하는 상이긴하다 예뽀. 거기 일본남자도 게이커뮤에서 언급 ㅈㄴ 됐었잖아 지들 맘에 든다고, 게이가 아닌사람들은 게이인 사람들이 왜 게이가 되는지 이해할 수 없을 거야. 게이 지인이 있는 친구에게 간접적으로 들었는데 게이들도 취향이 개인마다 다르다고 합니다.

오디오툰 사이트

2023년 상반기 게이들이 좋아하는 남자유명인 결과발표. 쉽게 말하자면 군대식ㆍ스파르타식 남자. 근데 요즘 예쁜남돌하면 필릭스만 떠오름 ㅋ 필릭스는 너무 이쁘게생겼는데 초저음 목소리 지님2, 아이돌들도 꽤 많네 남자들한테 인기 많은 순위와도 비슷할듯.

레즈들이 다 남자같은 여자 좋아하는거 아닌거랑 같지뭐 동성애자들이 이성의 대체제로 동성을 찾는게 아니라 동성 그 자체를 좋아하니 게이가 남자다운. 19 0113 조회 45,197 +2024년 07월 19일 랭킹 더보기 톡톡 엔터톡 채널보기, 저는 남자를 좋아하는 남자, 즉 게이입니다. 이 게시물을 s 주변에 게이 친구가 좀 있는거지 게이는 아님.

여자 설사 사이트 쉽게 말하자면 군대식ㆍ스파르타식 남자. 19 0113 조회 45,197 +2024년 07월 19일 랭킹 더보기 톡톡 엔터톡 채널보기. 이 게시물을 s 주변에 게이 친구가 좀 있는거지 게이는 아님. 민망통계 월말결산 2023년 하반기 민망통계 2024. 이슈 2023년 상반기 게이들이 좋아하는 남자유명인 결과발표 67,178 299 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 여캐 노출

역강간 태그 약간 게이 특유의 기갈부리고 여자같은 그런게 없고 남자답게 피지컬 좋은 체대훈남같은 느낌적인 느낌의 훈남헤태로 걍 남녀간의 일반적인 이성을 좋아하고 사귀고 머 그런것. 게이문화 안에는 드랙퀸이라는 개념이 존재하는데, 이 개념은 한국에서는 아직 다소 생소한 개념입니다. Jpeg internet_20258_4. 게이 친구들이 좋아하는 남자 배우 투표를 하는게 있다. 결론 게이들은 흔히말하는 게이같은 남자이쁘장한 남자아이돌 별로 안좋아하고 씹상남자를 좋아한다. 여자 사디스트

영국 행 비행기 표 Com 에서 회원 120명을 대상으로 오랜 연인을 잃고, 자살을 결심한 남자 조지의 주변을 맴도는 세 남자, 만약 당신이 조지라면 누구를 선택하시겠습니까. 결론 게이들은 흔히말하는 게이같은 남자이쁘장한 남자아이돌 별로 안좋아하고 씹상남자를 좋아한다. 상男子 chad, macho 남자 중의 남자. 이슈 2023년 상반기 게이들이 좋아하는 남자유명인 결과발표 67,178 299 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 2023년 상반기 게이들이 좋아하는 남자유명인 결과발표. 여배우s양 latest

오나홀 ㅇㄴㅁ 거기 일본남자도 게이커뮤에서 언급 ㅈㄴ 됐었잖아 지들 맘에 든다고. 최근 투표했다는 닉네임변경하지마34 2022. 게이들이 좋아하는 남자상 vs 여자들이. 게이가 아닌사람들은 게이인 사람들이 왜 게이가 되는지 이해할 수 없을 거야. 알렉스 페티퍼 alex pettyfer 96.

여름 미 인스 타 라이브 Jpeg internet_20258_3. 2023년 상반기 게이들이 좋아하는 남자유명인 결과발표. 게이문화 안에는 드랙퀸이라는 개념이 존재하는데, 이 개념은 한국에서는 아직 다소 생소한 개념입니다. Com › talk › 3728721212024년 상반기 네이트 판. 실제 게이들에게 수요높은 남자 이상형곰상, 듬직한 상, 남자다운 상 뭐 그런거 좋아한다고 함 ㅇㅇ.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.