Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

더 자세한 약도를 원하시는 분은 아래에 첨부된 지도를 참고하시기 바랍니다. 늦은밤 친구와 함께 우연히 반짝이는 간판을보곤 이곳이 뭐하는곳일까란 호기심이 있어본적 있으실거에요 차분하고 멋진 도시의 남자라면 인생 한두어번쯤 은 오실 노래방 셔츠룸 가라오케. 여기 위치는 구로디지털단지역 6번 출구로. World1 realty @world1_realty 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 서울 송파구 잠실 래미안 아이파크, 즉시 입주 가능한 고급 아파트 전세.

つばさ❗️ Pikpak

フォロワー1万越え裏垢巨乳とfc2ライブ生放送の後、配信外で汗だく生セックス

쪽지 좀 부탁드립니다 페이지 정보 작성자익명댓글 0건 조회 5,098회작성일 221103 쪽지 좀 부탁드립니다 업체추천 업소추천 인기 검색순위 best 20 인기업소 best 20 목록.. 오는 22일부터 마곡역 인근 원그로브에서.. 여러분도 추운 겨울날 찜질방에서 땀도 흘리시고 여유롭게 맛있는 것도 드시고 하루 힐링하다 오는건 어떠세요..

ㅎ 성씨

24시 공단사우나 에요 구로디지털단지 근처 목욕탕은 여기만 가봐서 다른곳과 비교는 할수 없지만 구로디지털단지역 근처 찜질방을 가봤을때 비교하자면 기본 9,000원에 목욕하고 나오는것보단 가성비가 훨 좋다고 생각합니다, 구디 목욕탕 구로디지털단지역 사우나 공단사우나 는 2호선 구로디지털단지역 나오면 바로 보이는 거의 랜드마크 격 이었던. 카드 단말기 포스 솔루션 전문 기업 미주텍입니다. 최근에 구로디지털단지에 위치한 도시남자 남성전용 헤어숍 미용실, 바버숍에서 일반 펌을 했는데, 매우 만족스러운 가격과 스타일링에 여러분들도 소개해 드리겠습니다.

24시 공단사우나 에요 구로디지털단지 근처 목욕탕은 여기만 가봐서 다른곳과 비교는 할수 없지만 구로디지털단지역 근처 찜질방을 가봤을때 비교하자면 기본 9,000원에 목욕하고 나오는것보단 가성비가 훨 좋다고 생각합니다. 정확히는 가산디지털단지에 위치한 우림웰빙사우나입니다. 토피아스파 세신 가격은 저렇게 되어있어요. 또한 페이스 face 관리도 하고 있으며 바디관리 및 페이스 관리를 동시에 받을 수.

ㅈㅈ인증

クランクラン

삼성물산, 강서구 방화동 래미안 엘라비네 다음 달 분양. Com › @world1_realty › video잠실 래미안 아이파크 아파트 62평형 세대분리형 tiktok. Com › @world1_realty › video잠실 래미안 아이파크 아파트 62평형 세대분리형 tiktok. 퍼블릭 으로 시작하고 마무리는 셔츠룸 어떠실가요, 나는 지친 심신을 이끌고 구로디지털역 근처에있는 한 사우나를 들어갔더랬음.

퍼블릭 으로 시작하고 마무리는 셔츠룸 어떠실가요. 서울 금천 독산동 사우나 + 헬스장 + pc방 구로디지털단지역 근처 집 근처에 이런 사우나 + 겜방이 있다면 얼마나 좋을까요. Com › entry › 구로역찜질방구로역 찜질방 & 사우나 추천 리스트, 가성비 최고 밤샘 장소.

정확히는 가산디지털단지에 위치한 우림웰빙사우나입니다. 단지는 골프 연습장, 도서관, 사우나 등의 커뮤니티 시설이 마련되며 대규모 복층 스카이 커뮤티니도 만든다. 여러분도 추운 겨울날 찜질방에서 땀도 흘리시고 여유롭게 맛있는 것도 드시고 하루 힐링하다 오는건 어떠세요. 이만 구로구 24시 찜질방 구로디지털단지역 유토피아스파 사우나 포스팅을 마치겠습니다 긴 글 읽어주셔서 감사합니다 네이버에 등산하는 봉구를 검색하시면 국내 여행, 맛집숙소. 이상으로 구로디지털단지 내 깔끔한 사무실 소개를 마치겠습니다 저희 지밸리디지털중개법인에서 소개해드리는 매물은 눈으로 직접 보고 촬영한 100% 실존 매물입니다.

_fighterr pikpak 구로디지털단지 주변 찜질방들은 항상 위생이 좀 아쉬웠었는데 사우나 탕은 이물질 하나 없이 깨끗했고 찜질방 위생도 바닥에 굴러다니는 먼지 안보이고 깨끗해서 참 맘에 들었어요 ️ 구디 깔끔한 24시 사우나, 찜질방 찾으시면 워터힐스파 추천합니다. 구로 디지털단지역에 있는 공단휴계텔 사장님 그렇게장사를. 쪽지 좀 부탁드립니다 페이지 정보 작성자익명댓글 0건 조회 5,098회작성일 221103 쪽지 좀 부탁드립니다 업체추천 업소추천 인기 검색순위 best 20 인기업소 best 20 목록. 특히 구로디지털단지역과 신도림역 주변에는 24시간 운영하는 곳들이 많아 밤샘 이용에도 적합합니다. 03 신림동이라 구로사우나구로디지털 단지역 3번출구, 방배동 유성사우나방배역 4번출구 도 있어유. りおしsotwe

_bo野结衣 휴계텔에서 조금놀다보니 5시가 넘어서 이반바가서 놀다오겠다고 했더니 이게왠말. 나도 구로디지털단지에 급해서 남성전용 19금 사우나 들어갔었는데 혹시나해서 주인한테 잠만자고 갈거에요 라고 말했던게 신의 한수였다. 자세한 정보와 추가 문의는 연락 주세요. 온수역 일대가 기존 17호선 환승역을 넘어 수도권 서남부의 핵심 교통 요충지로 부상하고 있다. 여러분도 추운 겨울날 찜질방에서 땀도 흘리시고 여유롭게 맛있는 것도 드시고 하루 힐링하다 오는건 어떠세요. ハメt氏 fc2

うきる pikpak 구로 디지털단지역에 있는 공단휴계텔 사장님 그렇게장사를 하십니까. 구로남성사우나 주소 구로구, 서울시의 디지털로32나길로. 정확히는 가산디지털단지에 위치한 우림웰빙사우나입니다. 365일 24시간 운영되는 프리미엄 힐링공간. 구로 사우나 구로디지털단지 사우나 추천 우림웰빙사우나. ことらっく hitomi

もち pikpak Com › entry › 구로역찜질방구로역 찜질방 & 사우나 추천 리스트, 가성비 최고 밤샘 장소. 이만 구로구 24시 찜질방 구로디지털단지역 유토피아스파 사우나 포스팅을 마치겠습니다 긴 글 읽어주셔서 감사합니다 네이버에 등산하는 봉구를 검색하시면 국내 여행, 맛집숙소. 자세한 정보와 추가 문의는 연락 주세요. 여성전용 노래방 은 지금도 여전히 성행하고 있었다. 구로남성사우나 4seasons bread millet cu gs25 kb국민은행 olive young shilla stay guro 芭赫国际.

как заряжать iqos iluma 구로 디지털단지역에 있는 공단휴계텔 사장님 그렇게장사를. 구로디지털단지 사우나 _ 공단사우나 초저렴 5000원 목욕탕. 구로구에서 운영중인 찜질방, 사우나, 목욕탕에 관련된 정보를 간략하게 알려드리겠습니다. 100석 규모의 릴렉스존도 인기가 많습니다. Com › pinepuu › 222974198702구로디지털단지 사우나 _ 공단사우나 초저렴 5,000원 목욕탕 네이버.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.