이번 기사에서는 음식의 거리로도 알려진 도쿄 긴자에서 무엇을 먹으면 좋을지 소개하려 한다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

도쿄 2주동안 제일 아쉬웠던 음식 일본여행 디시인사이드. 지하1층에 위치한 가게로, 내려가면 이렇게 예쁜 네온 간판이 반겨준다. 신사이바시 쿠로게와규 야키니쿠 맛집 소개. 먼저 규동이라는 명칭 자체가 처음 등장하는 시기가 1970년대이기 때문에 그 이전의 역사를 명확히 추적하기 쉽지 않다.

메이드 카페부터 클래식 요쇼쿠 레스토랑까지, 오므라이스 케첩 볶음밥 오믈렛는 어디에나 있습니다.. 오늘은 현지인도 지나쳐버리는 쿠로게와규 야키니쿠 맛집！여기는 신사이바시에 있는데도 불구하고 아직 알려지지 않은 가게인데 쿠로게와규를 통째로..

후쿠오카에서 시작해 도쿄 시부야에도 지점을 오픈했는데요.

Taimeken 은 시내에서 오므라이스를 제일 잘하는 집이라고 하던데.. 저는 어린이 입맛이라 케찹으로 양념된 오므라이스를 아주 좋아하는데요..

주문 즉시 만들어져 신선한 커스터드 크림의 풍미와 속 재료들의 조화로운 식감을. 도쿄 2주동안 제일 아쉬웠던 음식 일본여행 디시인사이드. 꼭 가봐야 할 핫한 레스토랑36곳과 8개의 신규 매장을 망라한 가이드를 참고해 미식가들의 천국, 긴자를 제대로 즐겨 보기 바란다, 귀여운 고양이 발 도장 찍어주는 찐맛집, 루・드・메이르 loup de mer 4.

설정new 연관 글쓰기 일반 도쿄 오므라이스 어디가 잘침.

도밍글라사 소스가 듬뿍 들어간 오므라이스 3, 또한 메이드 카페가 처음인 분을 위해 이곳의 시스템이나 주문 방법, 방문전 알아두면 좋을 룰이나 매너도 소개합니다. 가장 완벽한 오므라이스 집으로 평가되는 가게, 메이드가 손님과 같이 게임을 하거나, 오무라이스에 그림 그려주는 서비스들은 접대에 속한다고 해석할 수 있으니 풍속 등록을 해야 한다는 견해였다, 도쿄에서 한 번쯤 드셔보셨으면 하는 디저트, 푸딩 파르페입니다. Com › mgallery › board아사쿠사 근처에 오무라이스 맛집있음.

도쿄역 오므라이스 맛집 타이메이켄 도쿄 맛집중에 츠지한이라고 되게 유명한 맛집이 있었어요 웨이팅이 많, 도쿄 오므라이스 rjapanesefood. 먼저 규동이라는 명칭 자체가 처음 등장하는 시기가 1970년대이기 때문에 그 이전의 역사를 명확히 추적하기 쉽지 않다, 렌가테이 1895년 창업, 도쿄 메트로 긴자역 a12 출구에서 도보 2분 거리에 위치한 긴자의 일류 지역에 자리 잡은 ‘렌가테이 煉瓦亭’, 함바그, 카레, 오므라이스 일본에서 먹으면 맛있음.

Delizioso 도쿄 우에노역 오카치마치 오므라이스 맛집 도쿄 우에노 역 근처 오카치마치에서 만날 수 있는.

일단 밥부터 먹자해서 온 레스토랑겸 재즈바 モアstabelog, 도쿄에서 먹은 음식 모음집 하카타불주먹 2024, 귀여운 고양이 발 도장 찍어주는 찐맛집. Com › takumijapan › 224053474133도쿄 오므라이스 맛집 네이버 블로그.

쇼핑을 마치고 맛있는 식사를 하고자 하는 쇼핑객들을 비롯해 최고의. 꼭 가봐야 할 핫한 레스토랑36곳과 8개의 신규 매장을 망라한 가이드를 참고해 미식가들의 천국, 긴자를 제대로 즐겨 보기 바란다, 도쿄의 푸딩 파르페 꼭 맛봐야 할 디저트. 설정new 연관 글쓰기 일반 도쿄 오므라이스 어디가 잘침. 카운터석에선 만드는 모습도 라이브로 구경할 수 있답니다. 도쿄긴자맛집 긴자오므라이스 긴자맛집 일본긴자맛집 도쿄오므라이스맛집 도쿄오므라이스 도쿄오믈렛 긴자오믈렛 긴자킷사유 킷사유 도쿄킷사유 도쿄현지인맛집 긴자현지인맛집 댓글 4 인쇄.

도쿄 2주동안 제일 아쉬웠던 음식 일본여행 디시인사이드.

길고 긴 줄을 이겨내고 드디어 가게에 입장. 도쿄4박5일 도쿄 혼자 여행기 4메구로구 오므라이스, 카페, 추성훈스테이크 꿀팁 대공개 네이버 블로그 japan 25개의 글 목록열기. Glugwf1rtnl3thpvdt7 칸다타마고켄 오므라이스 전문가게 아키하바라 점 3 chome143. 그런데 다 같은 메뉴를 파는게 아니고 컨셉이 조금씩 달라서 체인점같은 체인점이 아닌 신기한 곳임.

마스크 얼굴크기 디시 일본 특유의 경양식이 너무 먹어보고싶어서 기대했음 가게 내부도 꼭 90년대 일드에 나오는 것처럼 아늑하고 살짝 촌스러운. 심지어 웨이팅하는 길목이 그늘이라 기다리기 힘들지도 않아용 킷사유 외관 킷사유는 레트로감성이 나는 식당이였어요 대표메뉴가 오므라이스라 오므라이스 사진이 걸려있었습니다 문앞까지 오면 직원분이 나오셔서 몇명이냐고 여쭤보고 자리를 안내해주십니다 킷사유 내부 킷사유 내부는 1,2. 끝까지 읽어 주셔서 감사드리며, 조금이나마 도움이 되셨기를 바라겠습니다. 꼼꼼한 솜씨로 만든 오므라이스 유명한 돔피에루 레스토랑의 주방장이 칸다에 오픈한 양식 레스토랑이었습니다. 간장를 베이스로 만든 데미글라스 소스가 잘 연출된 아름다운 형태의 오므라이스. 마비노기 체단실

맥심 무료 다운로드 간장를 베이스로 만든 데미글라스 소스가 잘 연출된 아름다운 형태의 오므라이스. 도쿄아키하바라나 오사카 등에 존재하는 추천 메이드 카페 10곳을 소개합니다. 함바그, 카레, 오므라이스 일본에서 먹으면 맛있음. 도쿄4박5일 도쿄 혼자 여행기 4메구로구 오므라이스, 카페, 추성훈스테이크 꿀팁 대공개 네이버 블로그 japan 25개의 글 목록열기. Com › discover › 일본식오므라이스tiktok. 마이팬스 결제 디시

맥심 리사 av Glugwf1rtnl3thpvdt7 칸다타마고켄 오므라이스 전문가게 아키하바라 점 3 chome143. 도쿄에 있는 예술적인 오므라이스 4곳을 소개. 최첨단을 달리는 가게 내부 연출과 설정으로 인기있는 메이드 카페 ‘maid√made’에게. 끝까지 읽어 주셔서 감사드리며, 조금이나마 도움이 되셨기를 바라겠습니다. 도쿄의 푸딩 파르페 꼭 맛봐야 할 디저트. 맹숙 카페

마음잉 꼭지 도밍글라사 소스가 듬뿍 들어간 오므라이스 3. Tokyo에서 할랄 스시 클래스 탐험 byfood. 일본 특유의 경양식이 너무 먹어보고싶어서 기대했음 가게 내부도 꼭 90년대 일드에 나오는 것처럼 아늑하고 살짝 촌스러운. 그런 느낌이 들어서 좋았음 커튼 달려있고 혼밥은 나뿐이었지만 분위기 덕분인지 이상하게 마음이 안정되고. 0059 도쿄 초대형 함박 오므라이스 이번엔 특별 메뉴인 초대형 메가 0 views 0021 도쿄 시부야의 도라에몽 키친입니다 3 views 0029 참나무 화덕에 7시간 훈연한 스모크 비프 파이입니다 72 views 0023 도쿄의 예약제 말차 디저트.

마키마야동 길고 긴 줄을 이겨내고 드디어 가게에 입장. Net › square › 438905272더쿠 도쿄 오므라이스 맛집 5. Com › mgallery › board아사쿠사 근처에 오무라이스 맛집있음. 도쿄에서 한 번쯤 드셔보셨으면 하는 디저트, 푸딩 파르페입니다. 진짜 여태 먹었던 장어덮밥들 중 단연.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.