Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

넥슨이 자체 ip를 유저들에게 개방해 2차 창작을 할 수 있도록 하는 넥슨 리플레이 베타서비스를 오픈했. 넥슨, 외부 2차 창작자에 ip 5종 개방 오픈라이선스. 넥슨otp의 시리얼번호를 변경하신 뒤 이용하실 수 있어요. 넥슨은 18일 자사 ip를 외부 창작자에게 개방해 자유로운 2차 창작을 지원하는 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 ‘리플레이’의 베타 홈페이지를 오픈했다고 밝혔다.

릴리아 야짤

루루 카 인스 타

Nexon 넥슨 otp 게임 로그인 시 발급되는 일회용 비밀번호를 넥슨플레이 어플리케이션 내에서 입력하여 계정을 안전하게 보호하세요, 아시아투데이 김윤희 기자 넥슨이 자사 지식재산권ip을 이용해 자유로운 2차 창작을 지원하는 ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 리플레이replay의 베타. 리플레이는 넥슨의 다양한 ip 자산을 기반으로 창작자에게 2차 창작 기회를 제공하는 오픈라이선스 프로젝트다, 넥슨코리아 마비노기 홈페이지 c1 리플레이 보상 상자 조회하기 c6 리플레이 보상 상자 조회하기 c7 리플레이 보상 상자 조회하기. 이번 리플레이 프로젝트로 인해, 2차 창작 기회가 열린 넥슨 ip는 총 9종이 됐다.

Welcome to the official channel of nexon korea.. 리플레이는 자사가 보유한 판권ip을 외부 창작자에게 개방해 2차 창작을 지원하는 것이다.. 넥슨은 18일 자사 ip를 외부 창작자에게 개방해 자유로운 2차 창작을 지원하는 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 ‘리플레이’의 베타 홈페이지를 오픈했다고 밝혔다..

넥슨코리아 마비노기 홈페이지 c1 리플레이 보상 상자 조회하기 c6 리플레이 보상 상자 조회하기 c7 리플레이 보상 상자 조회하기, 단순 재활용 아냐 오래된 게임의 잇단 부활. 넥슨은 자사 보유 지식재산권ip을 외부 창작자에게 개방해 2차 창작을 지원하는 ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 리플레이replay의 베타 홈페이지를 오픈하고 참가자 모집을 시작했다고 밝혔다. Welcome to the official channel of nexon korea. 기존 소수의 파트너사와 독점적 계약을 맺는 구조를 넘어, 누구나 넥슨 ip를 활용해 게임 및 콘텐츠를 제작할 수 있는 개방형 협업 생태계 구축을.

태동하는 클래식 게임시장 넥슨 프로젝트 리플레이, 넥슨, ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 가동외부 창작자에 ip 개방, 넥슨이 보유한 ip를 외부 창작자에게 개방해 자유로운 2차 창작을 지원하는 ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 리플레이의 베타 홈페이지를 개설하고, Com넥슨 게이머의 필수 앱, 넥슨플레이.

넥슨이 자체 ip를 유저들에게 개방해 2차 창작을 할 수 있도록 하는 넥슨 리플레이 베타서비스를 오픈했. 넥슨otp의 시리얼번호를 변경하신 뒤 이용하실 수 있어요. 프로그래밍 안종우, 조우진, 이용서 넥슨레드. 넥슨은 보유한 ip지식재산권를 외부 창작자에게 개방해 자유로운 2차 창작을 지원하는 ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 리플레이replay의 베타. Dnf duel 공식 홈페이지 공개, 대전 격투 게임으로 돌아온 던전앤파이터.

Project replay nexon. 서울뉴시스이주영 기자 넥슨이 자사가 보유한 지식재산권ip을 외부 창작자에게 개방해 자유로운 2차 창작을 지원하는 ip 오픈라이선스. A mass of dead 인디게임 스팀입성 성공기 그린라이트를 통한 스팀 입성기.

계정보안, 놓치기 쉬운 게임 소식, 다양한 포인트 혜택, 넥슨의 프로젝트 리플레이는 지난해 12월 깜짝 발표된 프로젝트로 어둠의전설, 일랜시아, 아스가르드, 택티컬 커맨더스, 에버플래닛 등 탄탄한 팬덤의. Kr › news › view넥슨, ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 ‘replay’ 베타 오픈, Project replay 넥슨의 ip로 창작의 새로운 문을 엽니다. 넥슨은 18일 자사가 보유한 ip를 외부 창작자에게 개방해 2차 창작을 지원하는 리플레이replay의 베타 홈페이지를 열고 참가자를 모집한다.

넥슨, 외부 창작자 대상 ip 개방리플레이 참가자 모집.. 프로젝트 리플레이란, 넥슨의 다양한 ip 자산을 팬이나 소규모 팀 등 창작자들에게 제공해, 2차 창작의 기회를 제공하는 오픈라이선스 프로젝트다..

로진 뜻 디시

Project replay 넥슨의 ip로 창작의 새로운 문을 엽니다. 넥슨은 지난 18일부터 ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 리플레이replay를 베타 오픈하고 참가자를 모집 중이다, 아시아투데이 김윤희 기자 넥슨이 자사 지식재산권ip을 이용해 자유로운 2차 창작을 지원하는 ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 리플레이replay의 베타. 넥슨, ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 replay 베타 오픈.

링콩이 꼭지 프로젝트 리플레이는 소수 기업과의 독점 계약이 아닌, 누구나 참여할 수 있는 개방형 구조를 갖고 있습니다. 16 가장 큰 차이점이라면 커스터마이징을 꼽을 수 있는데. 리플레이는 넥슨의 ip 자산을 활용해 2차 창작을 장려하는 프로젝트다. 이를 위해 넥슨은 베타 홈페이지를 열고 참가자를 모집하고 있다고 18일 밝혔다. 리플레이는 넥슨의 다양한 ip 자산을 기반으로 창작자에게 2차 창작 기회를 제공하고 이를 통해 ip의 새로운 활용 가능성을 모색하기 위해 기획된 오픈. 리정 겨

링크판 74 넥슨은 18일 자사가 보유한 ip를 외부 창작자에게 개방해 2차 창작을 지원하는 리플레이replay의 베타 홈페이지를 열고 참가자를 모집한다. 넥슨은 보유한 ip지식재산권를 외부 창작자에게 개방해 자유로운 2차 창작을 지원하는 ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 리플레이replay의 베타. Nexon 넥슨 otp 게임 로그인 시 발급되는 일회용 비밀번호를 넥슨플레이 어플리케이션 내에서 입력하여 계정을 안전하게 보호하세요. 서울뉴스1 김민재 기자 넥슨이 자사 지식재산권ip 2차 창작을 지원하는 ip 오픈 라이선스 프로젝트 리플레이replay 베타 홈페이지를 개설하고 참가자를 모집한다고 18일 밝혔다. 단순 재활용 아냐 오래된 게임의 잇단 부활. 룰34

링크랭킹 넥슨, 외부 2차 창작자에 ip 5종 개방 오픈라이선스. Replay는 넥슨의 ip 자산을 기반으로 창작자에게 2차 창작 기회를 제공해 새로운 가능성을 모색하기 위해. 태동하는 클래식 게임시장 넥슨 프로젝트 리플레이. Essential apps nexon gamers play nexon introducing the allnew nexon play. 넥슨은 지난 18일부터 ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 리플레이replay를 베타 오픈하고 참가자를 모집 중이다. 루루 카 루루 0820

르나 여장 해당 이슈는 추후 업데이트를 통해 수정될 예정이며 현재 버전에서는 디바이스 설정에서 설정 시 해결. 기존 소수의 파트너와 독점적 계약을 맺는 구조를 넘어. 리플레이 는 넥슨이 보유한 ip를 기반으로 하여 창작자들에게 2차 창작 기회를 제공하고, ip의 새로운 가능성을 모색하기 위한 오픈라이선스 프로젝트입니다. Kr › view › akr20251218113300017넥슨, ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 가동외부 창작자에 ip 개방. 넥슨이 보유한 ip를 외부 창작자에게 개방해 자유로운 2차 창작을 지원하는 ip 오픈라이선스 프로젝트 리플레이의 베타 홈페이지를 개설하고.

릴리나 리플레이는 넥슨의 ip 자산을 활용해 2차 창작을 장려하는 프로젝트다. 프로그래밍 안종우, 조우진, 이용서 넥슨레드. 넥슨코리아 마비노기 홈페이지 c1 리플레이 보상 상자 조회하기 c6 리플레이 보상 상자 조회하기 c7 리플레이 보상 상자 조회하기. Com › view › 1919168넥슨, ip 오픈 라이선스 프로젝트 리플레이 베타 오픈. 기존 소수의 파트너사와 독점적 계약을 맺는 구조를 넘어, 누구나 넥슨 ip를 활용해 게임 및 콘텐츠를 제작할 수 있는 개방형 협업 생태계 구축을.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.